Worcester Sheriff's Office
March 14, 2012 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“Our follow-up review indicated that these issues had not been fully resolved, as discussed below.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a transition audit of the Worcester Sheriff’s Office after a new sheriff took office, focused on finances, accounts, operations, and internal controls.
“The purpose of our review was to inform the new Sheriff of the status of fiscal and administrative operations as of the date he assumed office, to enhance the transition from the prior administration to the new administration, and to identify systems and internal accounting and administrative controls needing corrective action and improvement.”
The State Auditor reviewed the office because a new sheriff had been elected and the state wanted to give the incoming administration a clear picture of the office’s financial and administrative condition.
“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the General Laws, and in consideration of the election of a new Sheriff, the Office of the State Auditor conducted a transition audit of the status of financial activities, accounts, and functions and the related systems and control environment of the WSO as of the transition date of January 5, 2011, including reviews of fiscal year 2011 transactions prior and subsequent to the transition date.”
The sheriff’s office runs a large jail and house of correction, manages public money, and serves legal papers, so weak controls can affect public funds, compliance with law, and accountability.
“The WSO was appropriated $40,341,283 for fiscal year 2011 for the operation of the jail, house of correction, and any other statutorily authorized facilities and functions.”
For a resident, this report is about whether the sheriff’s office is handling taxpayer funds and fee revenue properly while operating safely and legally.
“The WSO ensures protection of the community by providing a safe and secure environment as well as correctional and educational services at its facilities.”
The office appeared to have enough money to finish fiscal year 2011, but the auditor said several financial and control problems still needed fixing.
“We have concluded that the WSO should have sufficient funds necessary to meet its fiscal obligations through the remainder of fiscal year 2011.”
The auditor recommended that the sheriff’s office and a special commission clarify rules, improve reporting, update controls, and transfer old unclaimed checks as required.
“The WSO should establish policies and procedures to ensure that outstanding checks are timely identified and that any outstanding unclaimed checks over one year old from the date of issuance are promptly remitted to the OST, as required.”
The report is significant because it shows which old problems were fixed, which remained unresolved, and where state law or policy needed clearer rules for sheriff’s offices.
“Chapter 61, Section 22, of the Acts of 2009 establishes a special commission to investigate and study the Sheriff’s Offices throughout the Commonwealth and make recommendations for the reorganization and consolidation of their operation, administration, regulation, governance, and finances, including recommending legislation.”
An internal control plan is the office’s written system for identifying risks and explaining the policies and procedures used to prevent errors, loss, misuse, or illegal activity.
“An internal control plan is a description of how a department expects to meet its various goals and objectives by using policies and procedures to minimize risk.”
4 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Partially Review and examine WSO fiscal operations to determine the status of accounts, activities, and records.
- Complied Review and examine fiscal year 2011 spending from July 1, 2010 through the date of transition and perform a comparison of budget to actual expenditures to determine the sufficiency of funds to meet the WSO’s obligations for the remainder of the fiscal year.
- Complied Review inventory controls over supplies and equipment and vehicle usage policies to determine their adequacy.
- Partially Follow-up on the issues contained in our prior audit of the WSO (No. 2009-1432-3S).
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: The lack of clarification creates inconsistent handling of inmate telephone commissions among Sheriff's Offices and uncertainty about whether funds belong in the Commonwealth's General Fund or the WSO account.
Standard: Chapter 29, Sections 1 and 2, Chapter 127, Section 3 of the General Laws, and Chapter 61, Section 12 of the Acts of 2009 ( Chapter 29, Section 2, of the General Laws; Chapter 29, Section 1, of the General Laws; Chapter 127, Section 3, of the General Laws; Chapter 61, Section 12, of the Acts of 2009 )
1 recommendation
- The special commission should consider inconsistencies in laws regarding telephone commissions and recommend legislation for consistent disposition.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "We await the results of this Commission to establish a recommended or uniform reporting requirement for monies derived from the inmate phone system."
Why it matters: Civil process revenues were not recorded in MMARS or deposited into a Commonwealth fund, reducing statewide accountability over public revenues and surpluses.
Standard: Chapter 37, Section 11; Chapter 262, Section 8; and Chapter 29, Sections 1 and 2 of the General Laws ( Chapter 37, Section 11, of the General Laws; Chapter 262, Section 8, of the General Laws; Chapter 29, Section 1, of the General Laws; Chapter 29, Section 2, of the General Laws )
1 recommendation
- The WSO and special commission should review civil processing fee accounting, consult with OSC, and file legislation to record fees in MMARS or another compliant mechanism.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The [WSO] awaits guidance from the same Commission (via Section 22) [of Chapter 61 of the Acts of 2009] on operational reporting requirements as well as policies and procedures for our Civil Process Division."
Why it matters: The WSO incurred unnecessary meal costs that could otherwise be used for other institutional expenses.
Standard: Chapter 7, Section 3B, of the General Laws ( Chapter 7, Section 3B, of the General Laws; Chapter 34B, Section 15, of the General Laws )
1 recommendation
- The WSO should review its meal policy, laws, and costs and consider charging at least the Commonwealth's cost, in conjunction with collective bargaining and special commission review.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "As stated in your report, there is conflicting state law that prohibits elimination of this employee benefit."
Why it matters: The WSO's financial reporting did not include all locally held assets and liabilities required by OSC guidance.
Standard: OSC's GAAP Instructions and generally accepted accounting principles
1 recommendation
- The WSO should develop policies and procedures to ensure future GAAP reports include all required locally held assets and liabilities, including civil processing data.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The requirements to provide bank account balances, via the Commonwealth’s GAAP process, for Civil Process monies generated will be another item resolved with the Commission’s [Chapter 61, Section 22 of the Acts of 2009] findings/recommendations."
Why it matters: Outstanding checks were not remitted to the Unpaid Check Fund as required, weakening cash management controls over locally held funds.
Standard: Chapter 29, Section 32, of the General Laws ( Chapter 29, Section 32, of the General Laws )
1 recommendation
- The WSO should establish policies and procedures to identify outstanding checks and promptly remit unclaimed checks over one year old to the Office of the State Treasurer.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Civil Process Division will begin returning unclaimed checks within the past fiscal year to the Office of the State Treasurer."
Prior findings revisited
"Our follow-up review revealed that these prior issues had been adequately resolved, as discussed below."
"Our follow-up review indicated that these issues had not been fully resolved, as discussed below."