Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Worcester Division of the Juvenile Court Department

February 26, 2013 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published February 26, 2013 Audit covers July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found Worcester Juvenile Court was generally handling money, records, payroll, bail, community service, and controls properly, but it still had problems keeping complete inventory records for court property.
source
“Based on our audit, we determined that, except for the issues noted in the Audit Findings section of this report, for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, WJC maintained adequate internal controls, accurate and complete records, and complied with applicable laws, rules, and regulations for the areas tested.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor report on the Worcester Division of the Juvenile Court Department, covering court operations from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011.

“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor conducted an audit of the Worcester Division of the Juvenile Court Department (WJC).”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the court had proper controls and records for money collected, bail, community service instead of fees, employee time reporting, and inventory, and whether prior audit problems had been fixed.

“Our audit objectives were to (1) assess the adequacy of WJC’s internal controls over the collection and processing of revenues, community service in lieu of payment of fees, bail funds, payroll time and attendance reporting, and inventory; (2) determine whether court records in support of revenue, bails, community service, payroll time and attendance, and inventory are complete, accurate, up to date and in compliance with applicable state laws, rules, and regulations and the Administrative Office of the Trial Court’s and the Juvenile Court Department’s policies and procedures; and (3) follow up on the issues identified in our prior audit of WJC (No. 2006-1246-3O).”
Why it matters

The court handled public money and bail funds, so accurate records and controls matter for accountability and public trust.

“During our audit period, July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, WJC collected revenues of $56,858 which it transferred to the Commonwealth.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, the audit gives some assurance that the court’s tested financial and administrative practices were mostly in order, while identifying one area that still needed cleanup.

“Our review encompassed the activities and operations of WJC’s Judge’s Lobby, Clerk-Magistrate’s Office, and Probation Office.”
The bottom line

The main unresolved issue was incomplete inventory records: many newer items were missing required information such as purchase date or cost, which made the listed value of court property too low.

“As a result, the value of WJC’s inventory, listed at $556,264 as of June 30, 2011, was understated by the cost of these 36 items.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that the court keep working with the Trial Court administration to fill in missing inventory dates and costs and check for missing information during future inventory reconciliations.

“WJC staff should continue to work with AOTC to update its current inventory list with the missing data, historical cost, and acquisition dates.”
Why it's significant

This was not a finding of missing property or major financial wrongdoing; it was mainly a repeat paperwork and asset-tracking problem after earlier issues with controls had been fixed.

“Our follow–up audit found that WJC implemented our prior audit recommendations.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Inventory records were missing required acquisition dates and item costs for fixed assets.
asset/inventory controlrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The value of WJC’s fixed asset inventory was understated and inventory records were incomplete.

Standard: Administrative Office of the Trial Court required inventory information for fixed assets, including date acquired and item cost. ( AOTC’s “Fiscal Year 2009 – Memo #8 on Equipment Inventory – Updated Procedures,” dated October 3, 2008 )

2 recommendations
  • WJC staff should continue to work with AOTC to update its current inventory list with the missing data, historical cost, and acquisition dates.agency: disagreed
  • When WJC reconciles the annual physical inventory to its perpetual inventory records, it should verify that all required information is listed for its fixed assets and update all listings with missing information.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The first justice disagrees that the inventory issues cited in the previous audit remain unresolved."
Auditor: "The fact that this type of omission continued to occur after our previous audit suggests that this is an ongoing problem that still needs to be resolved."

Prior findings revisited

Fixed
"Our follow–up audit found that WJC implemented our prior audit recommendations."
Still a problem
"Our follow-up audit found that WJC continues to perform an annual physical inventory of its fixed assets and reconciles it to the court’s perpetual inventory records."