Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Wareham Division of the District Court Department-Review of Probation Supervision Fees: Transactions and Monitoring of Fulfillment by Probationers

February 19, 2016 · Wareham Division of the District Court Department · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published February 19, 2016 Audit covers July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Auditors found that Wareham District Court sometimes let probation officers decide whether people on probation should pay monthly fees or do community service, and the court did not have an efficient central way to track that community service.
source
“The court does not always waive monthly probation supervision fees as required or effectively track community service.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor report about how the Wareham District Court handled probation supervision fees and community service during an 18-month period.

“This report presents the results of our audit testing at WDC specifically.”
Why was it audited?

The auditor was checking whether courts were properly recording, monitoring, and enforcing monthly probation supervision fees.

“Our overall audit of the Trial Court’s administration of PSFs (Report No. 2014-5160-3J) included audit testing at 16 district-court locations, including WDC, to assess the process the Trial Court has established for PSFs, determine whether PSF-related transactions were properly documented in court records, and determine whether probationers were adequately monitored to ensure that they were fulfilling the PSF requirement.”
Why it matters

If fees are waived without the required process, the state may lose money that some probationers could have paid.

“As a result, the Commonwealth may be forgoing PSFs that probationers would have been able to pay.”
What's in it for me?

For citizens, the issue is whether the court follows the law fairly and keeps clear records when deciding if someone must pay a fee or do community service instead.

“Specifically, it should make sure that it documents whether, based on court order, a probationer will pay a monthly PSF or whether a finding of fact has been held to allow the fee to be waived and community service performed instead.”
The bottom line

The audit found two main problems: fee waivers were not always handled as the law requires, and community service was not tracked efficiently enough.

“The Probation Office does not have a centralized method to effectively track hours of community service performed.”
What happens next

The report recommends that the court follow the legal process for fees and waivers, create central tracking for community service, and report community service hours regularly in MassCourts.

“WDC should establish a centralized method of tracking community service performed.”
Why it's significant

This report points to a fairness and accountability problem: without clear records, the court cannot easily know who owes community service, how much it is worth, or whether people are on track to complete it.

“As a result, WDC cannot readily determine how many community-service hours are owed, what community service amounts to in dollars, and whether offenders will be able to fulfill the requirements of court orders on schedule.”
Jargon, unpacked

A probation supervision fee is a monthly charge that people on probation normally have to pay; if the court properly waives it because payment would be too hard, the person must do unpaid community service instead.

“A PSF is a monthly fee that judges are statutorily required to assess for a criminal offender placed on probation (a probationer), to be paid for the length of his or her probation term.”

2 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Some judges allowed probation officers to decide whether probationers should pay probation supervision fees or perform community service.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: The Commonwealth may forgo probation supervision fees that probationers would have been able to pay.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires imposition of a probation supervision fee unless the court waives it after a finding of fact establishing inability to pay, in which case community service must be performed. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • WDC should comply with the requirements of Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the General Laws for the imposition and waiving of PSFs and the restitution made for nonpayment.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "However, I intend forthwith to remind all judges assigned to the Wareham District Court, that regardless of circumstance, they must document a finding of fact hearing and waiver by diligently using the existing Administrative Office of the District Court form on the Assessment or Waiver of Moneys in Criminal Case."
Auditor: "We believe that the actions taken by the First Justice (reiterating to all judges assigned to WDC the Trial Court’s process of holding and documenting findings of fact on PSF waivers) were responsive to our concerns and should help address this matter."
The Probation Office did not centrally track all community service hours effectively.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: WDC could not readily determine community-service hours owed, their dollar value, or whether offenders would complete court-ordered requirements on schedule.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires monitoring of community service, and best business practices require centralized tracking and accurate records. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • WDC should establish a centralized method of tracking community service performed.agency: disagreed
  • The Probation Office should promptly report all hours of community service performed by each probationer, regularly throughout the probation term, to the Clerk-Magistrate’s Office for recording in MassCourts so that both offices can readily determine the status of probationers’ accounts.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Probation Office in the Wareham District Court has a centralized method of effectively tracking all hours of community service assigned, performed and owed."
Auditor: "We do not dispute that the court may be able to determine a probationer’s progress toward fulfilling the community-service obligation."