Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Trial Court-Administration and Oversight of Probation Supervision Fee Assessments

January 13, 2016 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published January 13, 2016 Audit covers July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that Massachusetts Trial Court locations were not consistently following the rules for charging, waiving, or replacing probation supervision fees with community service.
source
“The Trial Court does not ensure that courts follow the required process when they waive assessments of probation supervision fees (PSFs) and that they assess PSFs in the correct amounts and only for probation cases.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a State Auditor review of how the Trial Court handled monthly probation supervision fees during part of 2012 and 2013.

“The Office of the State Auditor undertook this audit to review the Trial Court’s administration and oversight of probation supervision fee (PSF) assessments.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors wanted to see whether courts had a good process for assessing, waiving, collecting, and monitoring these probation fees.

“Does the Trial Court have an adequate process in place to document the assessment, waiver, and collection of PSFs?”
Why it matters

If courts do not follow the rules, some people may avoid required payments or community service, and the state and public-service organizations may lose out.

“As a result, courts may be allowing some offenders not to fulfill the terms and conditions of their probation; PSF assessments may go uncollected, meaning that the Commonwealth loses revenue it depends on; and nonprofit/public agencies that depend on this community service may not be receiving it.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, this is about fairness, public money, and whether community service ordered by courts is actually tracked and completed.

“As a result, court locations cannot readily determine how many community-service hours are owed, what community service amounts to in dollars, and whether probationers will be able to fulfill the requirements of court orders on schedule.”
The bottom line

The Auditor concluded that the Trial Court had system-wide problems with enforcing fee rules and tracking community service, but the Trial Court began taking steps to fix some of them.

“Overall, however, we believe that the actions taken by the Trial Court were responsive to our concerns and should help address this matter.”
Why it's significant

The audit covered 16 court locations that represented a meaningful share of probationers and fee collections, including $7.5 million in collections during the audit period.

“As part of our audit, we also conducted on-site audit testing at 16 Trial Court locations that together accounted for 12,470 (16%) of Trial Court probationers as of December 31, 2013, and $7.5 million (23%) of the $32.8 million in PSF collections transferred to the Office of the State Treasurer during the audit period.”
Jargon, unpacked

A probation supervision fee is a monthly charge that many people on probation must pay unless the court properly waives it, often requiring community service instead.

“A PSF is a monthly fee that judges are statutorily required to assess for a criminal offender placed on probation, to be paid for the length of his/her probation term.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Trial Court did not properly enforce required probation supervision fee assessment and waiver procedures.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationcash handling

Why it matters: Courts may allow probationers not to fulfill probation terms, probation supervision fee revenue may go uncollected, and nonprofit or public agencies may not receive required community service.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws; Office of the Commissioner of Probation’s 1989 Supervision Standards; Trial Court Fiscal Systems Manual ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws; Section 2:00 of OCP’s 1989 Supervision Standards; Section 6 of Chapter 280 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

3 recommendations
  • The Trial Court should ensure that judges comply with the requirements of Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the General Laws for the imposition and waiving of PSFs and the restitution made for nonpayment.agency: already implemented
  • The Trial Court should instruct judges to cease ordering one-time PSF assessments that contradict the statute.agency: already implemented
  • The Trial Court should reiterate its process of requiring a judicial order before a penalty can be changed from a payment to community service.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "These practices have now ceased and have been specifically addressed by Chief Justice Dawley in his recent Transmittal to the District Court."
Auditor: "Overall, however, we believe that the actions taken by the Trial Court were responsive to our concerns and should help address this matter."
The Trial Court did not uniformly implement or adequately track community service performed in lieu of probation supervision fees.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsreporting timeliness

Why it matters: Court locations cannot readily determine community-service hours owed, dollar equivalents, or whether probationers are fulfilling court orders on schedule.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws and best business practices for centralized tracking and timely recording ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

3 recommendations
  • The Trial Court should work with OCC to develop a reconciliation process to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the process used to track community service.
  • The Trial Court should develop a system to require OCC to record community service in accordance with the type of fee the service is intended to pay.
  • The Trial Court’s community-service program should be managed by OCC statewide, for all geographic locations, to ensure that probationers are receiving adequate job training and appropriate monitoring.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Community Service Program does not have adequate resources to provide supervised work crews to be picked up at every court location statewide."
Auditor: "We believe that the actions taken by the Trial Court (developing the capacity in its case-management system to allow real-time reporting of community service worked) were responsive to some of our concerns and will help address this matter."

Verified dollar findings

Projected / estimated $14,600,000 not in headline

Estimated or sample-projected amounts - shown separately because they are not a hard-identified dollar figure.

$13.2 million - estimated potential collections
$1.4 million - estimated value of community service if replaced with probation supervision fees