State Ethics Commission-Examination of Annual Internal Control Questionnaire
April 21, 2016 · State Ethics Commission · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“Some of the information that the State Ethics Commission (SEC) reported on its Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) to the Office of the State Comptroller (OSC) for fiscal year 2015 was inaccurate or not supported by documentation.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a limited audit by the Massachusetts State Auditor checking whether certain answers the State Ethics Commission gave about its internal controls were accurate for fiscal year 2015.
“The objective of our audit was to determine whether certain responses that SEC provided to OSC in its fiscal year 2015 ICQ were accurate.”
The Auditor reviewed the commission because state agencies must report on internal controls, and the Auditor wanted to verify whether selected answers were backed up by evidence.
“The overall objective of our audit was to determine whether SEC accurately reported certain information about its overall internal control system to OSC on its 2015 ICQ.”
Internal controls help make sure an agency follows the rules, protects public property, and reports reliable information. Bad or unsupported answers make oversight harder.
“Further, inaccurate information on the ICQ prevents OSC from effectively assessing the adequacy of SEC’s internal control system for the purpose of financial reporting.”
For an ordinary taxpayer, this matters because state agencies are expected to safeguard public assets and keep accurate records. The audit says weak inventory practices can increase the risk of loss, theft, or misuse.
“In addition, without performing and documenting an annual physical inventory and establishing procedures encompassing all phases of the inventory process, SEC is not ensuring that its capital assets are properly safeguarded against loss, theft, and misuse and that its inventory records are complete and accurate.”
The commission’s questionnaire said it was meeting certain requirements, but auditors found that several answers did not match the evidence.
“Specifically, although SEC indicated that it was complying with OSC guidelines in all the areas we reviewed, its internal control plan (ICP) was not based on guidelines issued by OSC; its organization-wide risk assessment did not include the risk of fraud; it could not document that it performed an annual physical inventory of its capital assets; and it did not have procedures encompassing all phases of the inventory process.”
The Auditor recommended that the commission fix the problems, follow Comptroller requirements, and ask the Comptroller for help if needed.
“SEC should take the measures necessary to address the issues we identified during our audit and should ensure that it adheres to all of OSC’s requirements for developing an ICP and accurately reporting information about its ICP, risk assessment, and capital-asset inventory on its ICQ.”
The audit was limited in scope, but it still found real weaknesses in how the commission documented and reported key controls. The commission said it would revise its plan and improve documentation.
“Based on its response, we believe that SEC is taking appropriate measures to address the concerns we identified.”
An Internal Control Questionnaire is the yearly form state departments use to tell the Comptroller how well their systems protect money, property, records, and operations.
“The ICQ is a document designed by OSC that is sent to departments each year requesting information and department representations on their internal controls over 12 areas: management oversight, accounting system controls, budget controls, revenue, procurement and contract management, invoices and payments, payroll and personnel, investments held by the Commonwealth, material and supply inventory, capital-asset inventory, federal funds, and information-technology security and personal data.”
3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply On its 2015 ICQ, did SEC give accurate responses in the area of its internal control plan?
- Did not comply On its 2015 ICQ, did SEC give accurate responses in the area of capital-asset inventory, for both generally accepted accounting principles and non-GAAP assets?
- Complied On its 2015 ICQ, did SEC give accurate responses in the area of personally identifiable information?
- Complied On its 2015 ICQ, did SEC give accurate responses in the area of audits and findings?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Inaccurate ICQ information impairs OSC’s ability to assess SEC’s internal controls, and weak inventory documentation increases the risk that assets may not be safeguarded against loss, theft, or misuse.
Standard: OSC internal control guidelines, COSO enterprise risk management guidance, OSC Internal Control Guide, and OSC Accounting and Management Policy and Fixed Assets—Acquisition Policy. ( Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws; OSC’s Accounting and Management Policy and Fixed Assets—Acquisition Policy; OSC’s Internal Control Guide )
2 recommendations
- SEC should take the measures necessary to address the issues identified and ensure it follows OSC requirements for developing an internal control plan and accurately reporting information about its internal control plan, risk assessment, and capital-asset inventory on its ICQ.
- SEC should request guidance from OSC if necessary.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Going forward, we will revise our ICP to conform with the 2015 Internal Control Guide, which provides much clearer guidance as to what the ICP should cover, including the various factors that should be addressed in each of the eight components of the ERM."
Auditor: "Based on its response, we believe that SEC is taking appropriate measures to address the concerns we identified."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on State Ethics Commission .
- Audit of the State Ethics Commission (SEC)Authority / Commission · May 22, 2020
- Audit of the State Ethics Commission (December 24, 2025)Authority / Commission · December 24, 2025