Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

State 911 Department

August 31, 2016 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published August 31, 2016 Audit covers July 1, 2013 – December 31, 2014 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the State 911 Department generally followed grant rules, but it was slow to reimburse 911 centers and missed some required oversight duties.
source
“Did the State 911 Department administer grants in accordance with Section 18B(i) of Chapter 6A of the General Laws?”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a performance audit of Massachusetts’ State 911 Department, covering selected activities from July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of certain activities of the State 911 Department for the period July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors reviewed how the department handled six reimbursable grant programs and the fund that pays for enhanced 911 services.

“In this performance audit, we examined certain activities of the State 911 Department related to the administration of its six reimbursable grants and to the Enhanced 911 Fund.”
Why it matters

Late reimbursements can put financial pressure on local 911 centers, especially when the money is used for payroll.

“Not having timely fulfillment of reimbursement requests, which ranged up to $742,186 within our audit sample and are most commonly used to cover payroll, results in a strain on some PSAPs’ budgets.”
What's in it for me?

If you pay for phone service in Massachusetts, you help fund the 911 system through a monthly surcharge, so the department’s spending and oversight affect public emergency services you may rely on.

“The surcharge was 75 cents per month during our audit period3 and is imposed on each subscriber or end user whose communication services are capable of accessing and using an enhanced 911 system, in accordance with Section 18H(a) of Chapter 6A of the General Laws.”
The bottom line

The main problems were delayed reimbursements, missing annual reports, and the lack of a required policy advisory committee.

“The State 911 Department has not filed a required annual report since fiscal year 2010.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended more staffing controls for reimbursements, better training for local 911 centers that submit bad paperwork, annual report controls, and appointments to the advisory committee.

“The State 911 Department should continue to monitor the number of reimbursement requests received, determine what resources it will need to meet its grant-processing guidelines, and ensure that there are enough staff members assigned to do so.”
Why it's significant

Beyond the audit findings, the report points to a larger policy issue: Massachusetts had many separate 911 call centers, and regionalizing them could improve service and reduce long-term costs.

“If the State 911 Department wants to facilitate the regionalization of PSAPs more effectively, it should consider taking other measures, such as creating better incentives for communities to regionalize or seeking to enact legislation that would mandate regionalization of PSAPs.”
Jargon, unpacked

A PSAP is the local or regional place that answers 911 calls and either sends emergency help directly or transfers the call to the right agency.

“[Facilities] assigned the responsibility of receiving 911 calls and, as appropriate, directly dispatching emergency response services or transferring or relaying emergency 911 calls to other public or private safety agencies or other PSAPs.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The State 911 Department did not process grant reimbursement requests on time.
grants managementreporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: Delayed reimbursements strained some PSAP budgets and discouraged some PSAPs from applying for grants.

Standard: Fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2015 State 911 Department grant guidelines required staff to use best efforts to review reimbursement requests and act within specified business-day timeframes. ( Fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2015 State 911 Department grant guidelines )

2 recommendations
  • The State 911 Department should continue to monitor the number of reimbursement requests received, determine what resources it will need to meet its grant-processing guidelines, and ensure that there are enough staff members assigned to do so.agency: partially agreed
  • The State 911 Department should provide specific feedback and training to the PSAPs that consistently submit inaccurate supporting documentation for their grant reimbursement requests.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "While the Department acknowledges the backlog that existed during this audit period, it should be noted that the timelines are not statutorily required, and that the Grant Guidelines specifically permit flexibility in these timeframes."
Auditor: "Based on its response, the State 911 Department is taking measures to address the concerns we identified regarding processing reimbursement requests."
The State 911 Department had not filed a required annual report since fiscal year 2010.
reporting timelinessinternal controlsgrants management

Why it matters: The Governor and Legislature lacked information needed to monitor grant activities and statutory and regulatory compliance.

Standard: Section 18B(j) of Chapter 6A of the Massachusetts General Laws requires the department to file a written annual report. ( Section 18B(j) of Chapter 6A of the Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • The State 911 Department should establish the necessary controls, including delegating clear responsibilities, to ensure that its annual report is filed.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "As noted in the Post-Audit Action section of the Report . . . the annual report has since been filed."
Auditor: "We acknowledge that the department filed its annual report for calendar year 2014, but we again recommend that it establish controls and delegate clear responsibility to ensure that the annual report continues to be filed as required."
The State 911 Department and State 911 Commission did not have an established policy advisory committee.
internal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: The department and commission were not benefiting from the required committee’s knowledge and advice on enhanced 911 services, systems, and network features.

Standard: Section 18B(c) of Chapter 6A of the General Laws requires a policy advisory committee. ( Section 18B(c) of Chapter 6A of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • The State 911 Department, the State 911 Commission, and the Secretary of EOPSS should ask the Governor to appoint the necessary members of the policy advisory committee.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Department is working with the Governor's Office to appoint members of this committee."
Auditor: "In its response, the department states that it is working with the Office of the Governor to appoint members to the committee, which we believe is appropriate and responsive to our concerns."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on State 911 Department .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →