Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Southern Berkshire Division of the District Court Department-Review of Probation Supervision Fees: Transactions and Monitoring of Fulfillment by Probationers

February 3, 2016 · Southern Berkshire Division of the District Court Department · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published February 3, 2016 Audit covers July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Auditors found that this court did not always follow the rules for probation supervision fees and did not track community service well enough.
source
“The court does not always waive monthly probation supervision fees as required or effectively track community service.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of how the Southern Berkshire District Court handled probation supervision fees from July 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.

“This report presents the results of our audit testing at SBDC specifically.”
Why was it audited?

The auditor checked whether the court properly recorded, monitored, and enforced probation fee requirements.

“The objective of our work at each court location was limited to determining the extent to which the court was complying with the responsibilities established by Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the General Laws, as well as guidance issued by the Trial Court; the Office of the Commissioner of Probation (OCP); and the court location itself, if it had issued any.”
Why it matters

These fees are required by law, and if they are waived, the court must properly document why and require community service instead.

“The PSF can be waived (in which case community service must be performed) upon order of the court after a finding of fact establishing that the probationer cannot pay the fee.”
What's in it for me?

For the public, this matters because the court may have missed fee revenue and may not have tracked community service clearly.

“As a result, the Commonwealth may be forgoing PSFs that probationers would have been able to pay.”
The bottom line

The audit found two main problems: fee waivers were not always handled correctly, and some fees were charged in the wrong way or to the wrong people.

“Some judges assess PSFs in incorrect amounts or against non-probationers.”
What happens next

The court said judges would be told to stop the practices the auditor questioned, including one-time probation fee charges and fees for people not on probation.

“Once again, I have now asked all judges assigned to the Southern Berkshire District Court to discontinue this practice.”
Why it's significant

The audit was significant because it showed the court needed clearer records and better compliance with state law for probation fees and community service.

“The Probation Office should promptly report all hours of community service performed by each probationer, regularly throughout the probation term, to the Clerk-Magistrate’s Office for recording in MassCourts so that both offices can readily determine the status of probationers’ accounts.”
Jargon, unpacked

A probation supervision fee is a monthly charge people usually have to pay while they are on probation; the amount depends on the type of probation.

“When an individual is placed on probation, Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires courts to assess the individual a $50 (administrative) or $65 (supervised) monthly probation supervision fee (PSF).”

2 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Some judges let probation officers decide whether probationers should pay supervision fees or perform community service.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: The Commonwealth may forgo probation supervision fees that probationers were able to pay, and required hearings for nonpayment may be bypassed.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires probation supervision fees and permits waiver only after a court finding of fact that the probationer cannot pay. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • SBDC should document whether probationers must pay a monthly probation supervision fee or whether a finding of fact supports waiving the fee and requiring community service instead.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "However, I intend forthwith to remind all judges assigned to the Southern Berkshire District Court, that regardless of circumstance, they must document a finding of fact hearing and waiver by diligently using the existing Administrative Office of the District Court form on the Assessment or Waiver of Moneys in Criminal Case."
Auditor: "We believe that the actions taken by the First Justice (reiterating to all judges assigned to SBDC the Trial Court’s process of holding and documenting findings of fact on PSF waivers) were responsive to our concerns and should help address this matter."
The court did not centrally track community service hours performed by probationers.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The court could not readily determine how many community-service hours were owed, their dollar value, or whether probationers would meet court-ordered requirements on time.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires adequate monitoring of community service, and best business practices require centralized tracking. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • SBDC should establish a centralized method of tracking community service performed.
  • The Probation Office should promptly report community service hours to the Clerk-Magistrate’s Office for MassCourts recording throughout the probation term.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Probation Office in the Southern Berkshire District Court has a centralized method of effectively tracking all hours of community service assigned, performed and owed."
Auditor: "However, the court lacks an efficient means to do this, because the spreadsheet referred to in SBDC’s response does not specify the balance owed for each type of fee or the dates when community service was performed."
Some judges assessed probation supervision fees as one-time fees or charged them to people who were not on probation.
internal controls

Why it matters: The court collected fees in amounts or from people not authorized by the probation supervision fee statute.

Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires monthly probation supervision fees from probationers; Chapter 6 of Chapter 280 of the General Laws allows court costs to be assessed to offenders. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws; Chapter 6 of Chapter 280 of the General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • Judges should stop ordering one-time probation supervision fee assessments that contradict the statute and should use other allowable fines or fees for non-probationers.
  • Judges should assess other allowable court fines or fees to non-probationers when appropriate.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Once again, I have now asked all judges assigned to the Southern Berkshire District Court to discontinue this practice."
Auditor: "We believe that the actions taken by the First Justice (asking all judges assigned to SBDC to cease ordering PSFs for non-probationers and assessing one-time PSFs) were responsive to our concerns and should help address this matter."