Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Roxbury Community College (RCC) Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center

April 9, 2014 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published April 9, 2014 Audit covers July 1, 2010 – March 31, 2012 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Auditors found weak oversight at the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center: missed or poorly tracked revenue, improper charges to public high-school track leagues, purchasing problems, payroll paperwork issues, and missing background checks.
source
“The Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center (the Center) is an indoor track facility located at 1350 Tremont Street, Boston, owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and governed by Roxbury Community College (RCC).”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of Roxbury Community College’s management of the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center from July 1, 2010 through March 31, 2012.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2010 through March 31, 2012.”
Why was it audited?

The auditor reviewed whether RCC kept accurate financial records, properly handled money coming in and going out, used revenue for the Center’s operations and capital needs, and followed applicable rules.

“Our audit objectives were to review and assess RCC’s internal controls over certain operations and activities at the Center and determine whether (1) the Center’s financial records were accurate and were being properly maintained; (2) receipts and expenditures were accurately accounted for; (3) revenues were collected and expended for operations and capital needs, as required by the Center’s appropriation; and (4) RCC complied with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies and procedures related to the operation of the Center in the areas reviewed.”
Why it matters

The Center is a public facility, so poor controls can mean lost public revenue, improper fees, weak safeguards over spending, and avoidable risk to people using the facility.

“As a result, there is inadequate assurance that all of the goods that RCC paid for were received in good condition, if they were received at all, and properly safeguarded against theft or misuse.”
What's in it for me?

If you are a taxpayer, student, athlete, parent, or community member, the report matters because it concerns whether a public sports facility is collecting money fairly, spending carefully, and protecting users.

“As a result, RCC cannot effectively ensure the safety of its students and staff as well as children, the disabled, and the elderly who have access to the RCC and/or the Center.”
The bottom line

The Center needed stronger management, clearer policies, better financial controls, and closer RCC board oversight.

“The board of trustees at RCC should immediately address issues pertaining to RCC’s overall management and operation of the Center.”
What happens next

The audit recommended that RCC’s board strengthen oversight, set and enforce fee policies, improve contracts and cash handling, stop charging public high-school track leagues, fix purchasing and payroll controls, and complete required background checks.

“The Roxbury Community College Board of Trustees and the administration will review, modify and implement all policies, procedures, and practices, as well as appropriate staff responsibilities, to ensure accountability and compliance with all governing rule and regulations.”
Jargon, unpacked

A retained-revenue account means the Center could keep and spend certain money it collected, up to an approved limit, to run the facility and address capital needs.

“The Center’s appropriation, known as a retained-revenue account, allows the Center to collect and expend revenue up to a predetermined amount to operate the facility.”

5 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Center lacked adequate management and oversight controls over rental and admission revenue.
cash handlinginternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: The Center failed to collect needed revenue, lost thousands of dollars, and could not account for some admission fees.

Standard: Chapter 15A, Section 22A(d), of the Massachusetts General Laws requires market-rate fees for nonpublic use of the Center. ( Chapter 15A, Section 22A(d), of the Massachusetts General Laws; Chapter 15A, Section 22A(b), of the Massachusetts General Laws )

4 recommendations
  • Increase oversight of the management and operation of the Center, including establishing fees and policies for public, nonpublic, and charitable use.agency: agreed
  • Establish formal management reporting lines between the Center director and RCC president.agency: agreed
  • Execute written agreements with nonpublic entities renting the facility.agency: agreed
  • Ensure admission fees are collected, accounted for, safeguarded, and deposited.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The College accepts the findings and recommendations."
Auditor: "Based on its response, we believe that RCC is taking appropriate measures to address the problems we identified."
The Center improperly charged public high-school track leagues rental fees.
cash handlinginternal controls

Why it matters: Public high-school leagues unnecessarily paid fees for use of a facility that state law required be available to them free of charge.

Standard: Chapter 15A, Section 22A(d), states that the Center should be available free of charge to public high-school track programs. ( Chapter 15A, Section 22A(d), of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • Stop charging public high-school track leagues for use of the facility.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The College will not charge public high schools for track activities as required by law."
Auditor: "Based on its response, we believe that RCC is taking appropriate measures to address our concerns on this issue."
The Center did not follow RCC purchasing, receiving, and payment procedures.
procurement/contractsrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsasset/inventory control

Why it matters: RCC lacked assurance that goods paid for were received in good condition and safeguarded against theft or misuse.

Standard: RCC Office of Business and Finance Guide for Purchase of Goods and/or Services requirements for delivery, receiving verification, receipt signatures, and documentation. ( RCC Office of Business and Finance Guide for Purchase of Goods and/or Services )

2 recommendations
  • Require the Center to comply with RCC purchasing guide requirements and put oversight and monitoring controls in place.agency: agreed
  • Update the purchasing guide to include Center-specific delivery and receiving procedures when goods must be delivered directly to the Center.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The College’s Business Office will ensure that Center staff members follow established procedures for the purchase, receipt and payment of goods and services."
Auditor: "Based on its response, we believe that RCC is taking appropriate measures to address concerns we identified."
RCC did not ensure the Center followed personnel, payroll, and background-check procedures.
payroll/timerecordkeeping/documentationinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: The Center risked worker misclassification penalties, contract disputes, invalid payroll expenditures, overpayments, and reduced safety assurance for students, staff, children, disabled people, and elderly people.

Standard: Commonwealth contractor classification rules, OSC contract requirements, RCC payroll practices, and RCC CORI/SORI policy. ( Commonwealth policy, Individual Contractors: Contract Employees vs. Independent Contractor; OSC Expenditure Classification Handbook; Chapter 6, Section 178C, of the General Laws )

5 recommendations
  • Complete and retain Employment Status Forms for all contract employees.agency: agreed
  • Renew, sign, and retain contract employee contracts on time.agency: agreed
  • Ensure contract employee hours and compensation comply with contract terms.agency: agreed
  • Establish payroll and timesheet administration policies for the Center.agency: agreed
  • Perform SORI background checks at both the college and the Center and implement related procedures.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The College’s Human Resources Office will ensure that Center staff complete all required forms."
Auditor: "Based on its response, we believe that RCC is taking appropriate measures to address concerns we identified."

Verified dollar findings

Projected / estimated $3,500 not in headline

Estimated or sample-projected amounts - shown separately because they are not a hard-identified dollar figure.

$3,500 - estimated unaccounted-for gate collections
Other identified $15,520 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$15,520 - lost revenue