Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Residential Support Services, Inc.

September 24, 2015 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published September 24, 2015 Audit covers July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The State Auditor reviewed Residential Support Services, Inc. and did not find significant problems in the areas checked.
source
“Our audit revealed no significant instances of noncompliance that must be reported under generally accepted government auditing standards.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of Residential Support Services, Inc., a nonprofit that provides assisted and supported living services for elderly people.

“Residential Support Services, Inc. (RSSI) is a not-for-profit organization that provides assisted- and supported-living services to the elderly.”
Why was it audited?

The audit looked at whether the organization’s board was set up properly and carried out oversight duties required by rules, contracts, and guidance.

“The purpose of this audit was to assess whether RSSI’s board of directors was constituted, and performed various oversight functions, in a manner consistent with applicable regulations, contractual terms and conditions, and other guidance.”
Why it matters

The state spends large amounts of public money on private human-service providers, so boards need to make sure those providers are run responsibly.

“Each fiscal year, state agencies purchase more than $2 billion in services from private human-service organizations that are governed by boards of directors.”
What's in it for me?

For taxpayers and residents, the report says this provider’s board oversight passed the specific checks the auditor performed.

“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer and the conclusion we reached regarding each objective.”
The bottom line

The auditor did not identify significant deficiencies requiring attention from the board or state oversight agencies.

“For the areas reviewed that were related to our audit objectives, we did not identify any significant deficiencies warranting attention by those responsible for governance and state oversight agencies.”
What happens next

The report does not list corrective actions, because the auditor did not report significant problems in the reviewed areas.

“Our audit revealed no significant instances of noncompliance that must be reported under generally accepted government auditing standards.”
Why it's significant

The audit supports accountability in state human-service contracting and found RSSI met the specific board oversight requirements reviewed.

“This audit was conducted as part of OSA’s ongoing efforts to audit human-service contract activity by state agencies and to promote accountability, transparency, and cost effectiveness in state contracting.”
Jargon, unpacked

The board’s role is to oversee the organization, set policies, evaluate the top executive, and make sure laws, rules, policies, and contracts are followed.

“Board members perform a variety of key fiduciary functions for organizations, including overseeing overall operation; setting policies and procedures to ensure that objectives are met; hiring and evaluating the top executive; and ensuring compliance with established laws, regulations, policies and procedures, and contractual obligations.”

What the Auditor checked