Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Old Colony Elder Services, Inc.

September 30, 2015 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published September 30, 2015 Audit covers July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The auditor checked Old Colony Elder Services’ board oversight and found no major problems in the areas reviewed.
source
“Our audit revealed no significant instances of noncompliance that must be reported under generally accepted government auditing standards.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of Old Colony Elder Services for July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, and conclusion for the audit period, July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014.”
Why was it audited?

The audit looked at whether the organization’s board was set up properly and carried out key oversight duties under applicable rules and contract requirements.

“The purpose of this audit was to assess whether OCES’s board of directors was constituted, and performed various oversight functions, in a manner consistent with applicable regulations, contractual terms and conditions, and other guidance.”
Why it matters

The group receives significant public funding, so the state checked whether oversight of that money and leadership was being handled properly.

“OCES’s total revenue for fiscal year 2014 was $34,232,943, of which $19,815,946 was from state contracts, primarily with the Executive Office of Elder Affairs.”
What's in it for me?

If you are an older adult, a person with disabilities, a caregiver, or a taxpayer, this audit gives some assurance that the reviewed governance controls at this service provider did not show major issues.

“Old Colony Elder Services, Inc. (OCES) is a not-for-profit corporation that provides care and social services to the elderly and people with disabilities.”
The bottom line

For the specific areas the auditor reviewed, no significant deficiencies were found.

“For the areas reviewed that were related to our audit objectives, we did not identify any significant deficiencies warranting attention by those responsible for governance and state oversight agencies.”
What happens next

The report does not list corrective actions; it says the auditor discussed the report with the organization and considered its comments before issuing it.

“My audit staff discussed the contents of this report with management of the organization, whose comments we considered in drafting this report.”
Why it's significant

This matters beyond one organization because Massachusetts spends billions on services from private human-service organizations governed by boards.

“Each fiscal year, state agencies purchase more than $2.5 billion in services from private human-service organizations that are governed by boards of directors.”
Jargon, unpacked

In plain terms, the audit checked board independence, executive review and pay approval, and whether extra compensation followed state rules.

“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer and the conclusion we reached regarding each objective.”

What the Auditor checked