Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Office of Medicaid (MassHealth)-Review of MassHealth's Progress to Implement Alternative Payment Methodologies

February 18, 2016 · Office of Medicaid (MassHealth) · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗ · official site ↗

Published February 18, 2016 Audit covers August 6, 2012 – June 30, 2015 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
MassHealth was supposed to move many members away from traditional fee-for-service payments and toward newer payment models, but it missed the 2014 target even though it made some progress.
source
“Although MassHealth has made progress, it has not reached the APM adoption rate required by Chapter 224.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of MassHealth’s progress in changing how it pays for healthcare services.

“The purpose of this audit was to assess MassHealth’s progress in reaching the benchmarks established by Chapter 224 for transitioning to APMs.”
Why was it audited?

The audit was done because a 2012 Massachusetts law required MassHealth to shift eligible members into alternative payment methods and required the State Auditor to review the effects of that law.

“The Office of the State Auditor (OSA) is required by Chapter 224 of the Acts of 2012 (An Act Improving the Quality of Health Care and Reducing Costs through Increased Transparency, Efficiency and Innovation) to review financial and programmatic effects of this legislation and present findings and recommendations to the Legislature by March 31, 2017.”
Why it matters

This matters because Medicaid is a very large part of the state budget, and payment reform was intended to help improve care while controlling costs.

“Medicaid expenditures represent approximately 38% of the Commonwealth’s total annual budget.”
The bottom line

MassHealth beat the first target but fell far short of the second: 30% adoption in 2013, then 29% in 2014 when the law called for 50%.

“MassHealth’s reported alternative payment methodology (APM) adoption rate as of July 1, 2013 was 30%, which exceeded the 25% benchmark established by Chapter 224.”
What happens next

The auditor said MassHealth should keep working toward the legal benchmarks, improve how it calculates adoption rates, and check the data it gets from managed-care organizations.

“MassHealth, in collaboration with its contractors, should continue its efforts to achieve the APM benchmarks established by Chapter 224.”
Why it's significant

The audit found that missing the benchmark meant MassHealth was not fully meeting the Legislature’s mandate to improve care quality and control program costs.

“By missing the mandated July 1, 2014 APM benchmark, MassHealth is not achieving its mandate from the Legislature to improve the quality of healthcare services and effectively rein in the program’s costs.”
Jargon, unpacked

An alternative payment methodology means a payment approach that is not just fee-for-service; examples include shared savings, bundled payments, and global payments.

“Alternative payment methodologies (APMs) are alternatives to the more common method of paying for healthcare, the fee-for-service (FFS) method.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

MassHealth did not fully reach the required adoption rate for alternative payment methodologies.
internal controlsreporting timelinessvendor oversight

Why it matters: MassHealth was not achieving the Legislature's mandate to improve healthcare quality and control program costs.

Standard: Section 261 of Chapter 224 of the Acts of 2012 required MassHealth to pay for healthcare using alternative payment methodologies for specified percentages of eligible members by July 1, 2013 and July 1, 2014. ( Section 261 of Chapter 224 of the Acts of 2012; Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

3 recommendations
  • MassHealth, in collaboration with its contractors, should continue its efforts to achieve the APM benchmarks established by Chapter 224.agency: agreed
  • MassHealth should develop a method for accurately calculating its APM adoption rate from year to year.agency: agreed
  • MassHealth should verify the accuracy of MCO-solicited data that it plans to use to measure its APM adoption rates.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MassHealth is committed to achieving the ultimate APM benchmark in Chapter 224 of covering 80% of the eligible MassHealth population, and MassHealth’s current administration has made APM development and implementation a central strategic priority as part of a broader effort to improve the sustainability of the MassHealth program."
Auditor: "In its response, MassHealth states that it agrees with our audit finding and recommendations but is concerned about our discussion of obstacles to APM implementation."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Office of Medicaid (MassHealth) .

See this entity's page with all 71 audits →