Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Northampton Housing Authority

January 23, 2014 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published January 23, 2014 Audit covers July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2012 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that Northampton Housing Authority generally followed the rules, but it bought some services without getting required competitive quotes or bids.
source
“The Authority procured goods and services from three vendors without following competitive bidding guidelines, contrary to Chapters 30B and Chapter 149 of the General Laws.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Northampton Housing Authority covering July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2012.

“I am pleased to provide this performance audit of the Northampton Housing Authority.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the Authority had proper controls over buying goods and services and whether it followed state housing procurement rules.

“The objectives of our audit were to review and analyze the Authority’s internal controls over its procurement of goods and services and to determine whether its procurement activities were efficient and in compliance with the Department of Housing and Community Development’s (DHCD’s) procurement guidelines and laws, rules, and regulations applicable to state-aided housing programs.”
Why it matters

Competitive bidding helps protect public money by showing whether taxpayers got a fair price and good value.

“As a result, the Commonwealth cannot be certain that it received the best value for these services.”
What's in it for me?

If you live in or help fund public housing, this matters because procurement rules are meant to make sure housing agencies spend public money carefully.

“The Authority manages both federal and state-aided units within the city of Northampton, including the city’s Florence section.”
The bottom line

Aside from the bidding problems, auditors said the Authority’s tested controls and purchasing were generally adequate and compliant.

“Based on our audit, we have concluded that, except for the issue addressed in the Detailed Audit Results and Findings section of this report, for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2012, the Authority maintained adequate internal controls in the areas tested and conducted its procurements in an efficient manner in compliance with DHCD guidelines and laws, rules, and regulations applicable to state-aided housing programs.”
What happens next

The Authority should strengthen its controls so it uses competitive purchasing when total yearly spending for the same vendor and service reaches state limits.

“The Authority should establish internal controls that ensure that it complies with all applicable laws and regulations when procuring goods and services, including using competitive procurement practices when it can reasonably determine that the total purchases from a single vendor for the same services within a single year will meet or exceed the procurement limits established by state law.”
Why it's significant

The audit covered more than just one small purchase: the Authority’s response says the review looked at over 25 contracts and $978,000 in spending over two fiscal years.

“The Northampton Housing Authority (NHA) appreciates the thorough work of the State Auditor’s Office (SAO) in reviewing the Northampton Housing Authority’s compliance with the bidding and administration of more than 25 Personal Services, Goods and Services, and Construction contracts representing $978,000 dollars in spending over the two fiscal years audited.”
Jargon, unpacked

“Procurement” means how the Authority buys goods and services; here, the issue was not getting quotes or bids when the law required them.

“Chapter 30B of the General Laws, the Uniform Procurement Act, requires the use of competitive bidding in obtaining goods and services.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Authority bought services from vendors without using required competitive procurement practices.
procurement/contractsinternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: The Commonwealth cannot be certain that it received the best value for these services.

Standard: Chapters 30B and 149 of the Massachusetts General Laws ( Chapter 30B of the General Laws; Chapter 149, Section 44(A)(2)(B), of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • The Authority should establish internal controls to ensure compliance with applicable procurement laws and regulations, including competitive procurement when annual purchases from one vendor for the same services will meet or exceed statutory thresholds.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The NHA has and will continue to attempt to properly comply with Procurement law and policy in all areas of procurement."