Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

North Cottage Program, Inc.

October 30, 2015 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published October 30, 2015 Audit covers July 1, 2012 – June 30, 2014 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found North Cottage’s finances and billing were generally supported, but its board did not meet required governance rules: it had too few members, too many managers serving on it, and had not formally reviewed the executive director.
source
“Contrary to its contract conditions, North Cottage’s board did not review the executive director’s performance.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of North Cottage Program, Inc., a Norton nonprofit that provides drug and alcohol rehabilitation services for adult men.

“North Cottage is a human-service agency located in Norton, Massachusetts, that provides drug and alcohol rehabilitation services to men aged 18 and over who are in various stages of recovery.”
Why was it audited?

The Auditor reviewed North Cottage to see whether it followed rules tied to its state-funded programs.

“The purpose of our audit was to determine whether North Cottage complied with certain laws, regulations, and other requirements pertinent to the operation of its state-funded programs.”
Why it matters

Board oversight matters because the board is supposed to guide the organization, keep it accountable, and make sure leadership is properly supervised.

“Since the board is responsible for establishing overall guidance for the organization and providing oversight, a lack of sufficiently independent board members affects the internal control environment and the board’s ability to operate effectively and in the best interest of the organization.”
What's in it for me?

If you are a taxpayer, client, family member, or community member, this audit is about whether public money going to treatment services is being overseen properly.

“This audit was conducted as part of OSA’s ongoing efforts to audit human-service contracting activity by state agencies and to promote accountability, transparency, and cost effectiveness in state contracting.”
The bottom line

The Auditor’s main concern was governance: North Cottage’s board did not match contract and bylaw requirements, and it had not done the required executive director review.

“North Cottage’s board of directors did not have the correct number or composition of members, nor did it evaluate the executive director’s performance.”
What happens next

The Auditor recommended that North Cottage fix the board makeup and formally review the executive director each year, including documenting the review and tying compensation changes to performance.

“North Cottage’s board of directors should review and document the executive director’s performance each year and should base any change in his/her compensation on this performance review.”
Why it's significant

The audit found no problems with the sampled billing and expense questions, but it did find noncompliance in board governance.

“Did North Cottage’s board of directors comply with the requirements of its state contracts and corporate bylaws regarding board composition and the evaluation of the organization’s executive director?”
Jargon, unpacked

A “performance audit” means auditors checked whether selected activities met rules and standards, not just whether the math added up.

“We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

North Cottage’s board did not have the required number of members and had too many management employees.
internal controls

Why it matters: Insufficiently independent board membership weakened the internal control environment and reduced the board’s ability to operate effectively in the organization’s best interest.

Standard: Section 11(a) of the Commonwealth’s Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services and Article IV, Section 2, of North Cottage’s bylaws ( Section 11(a) of the Commonwealth’s Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services; Article IV, Section 2, of North Cottage’s bylaws )

1 recommendation
  • North Cottage should ensure that its board of directors has seven members comprising no more than 30% management employees.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "However; with the addition of a new board member . . . we have brought ourselves into full compliance."
North Cottage’s board did not review the executive director’s performance.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: There was inadequate assurance that the board properly oversaw the executive director and based compensation on performance.

Standard: Section 11(a) of the Commonwealth’s Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services ( Section 11(a) of the Commonwealth’s Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services )

1 recommendation
  • North Cottage’s board of directors should review and document the executive director’s performance each year and should base any change in his/her compensation on this performance review.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "As of April 15th, a performance evaluation was indeed conducted and has been included in the documentation."