Norfolk County Division of the Probate and Family Court Department
April 4, 2014 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“Based on our audit, we have concluded that for the period July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2012, NCPFC improved its bank-reconciliation procedures; complied with applicable laws and regulations over granting civil fee waivers; sufficiently secured case files; and adequately processed, deposited, and accounted for cash received.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a State Auditor performance audit of the Norfolk County Probate and Family Court covering July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2012.
“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2012.”
Auditors checked whether the court was properly handling money, records, fee waivers, internal controls, accounts owed, old audit issues, and custodial accounts held for other people.
“The objectives of our audit were to determine (1) whether custodial account assets are current or should be transferred to the Office of the State Treasurer (OST) in accordance with state law and Trial Court policies; (2) whether NCPFC is complying with laws and regulations pertaining to the waiver of fees as well as to the type and number of cases involving waived fees; (3) whether NCPFC is complying with Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989, An Act Relative to Improving the Internal Controls within State Agencies; (4) whether NCPFC’s case records are adequately secured and protected; (5) whether NCPFC has adequate internal controls over financial and fund management activities related to the collection, accounting, and depositing of all fees and assessments; (6) whether the court is managing accounts receivable in accordance with established guidelines; and (7) the status of the issues identified in our prior audit of NCPFC (No. 2005-1224-3O) and any other internal audits affecting the current audit objectives.”
The problems matter because poorly tracked funds can be lost, misused, stolen, or not returned to the people who are entitled to them.
“Because of the improper account maintenance, the funds contained in these accounts are at risk of fraud, theft, and abuse; potential beneficiaries cannot be properly notified about funds that they may be owed; and even when funds are returned to claimants, they may not represent the full amount to which claimants are entitled.”
For ordinary citizens, the most direct issue is whether court-held money, fee decisions, and public-facing court services are handled accurately, fairly, and with accountability.
“The Norfolk County Division of the Probate and Family Court Department (NCPFC) presides over probate and family matters falling within its territorial jurisdiction of Norfolk County.”
The court needed to do a better job tracking custodial accounts, collecting and reconciling amounts owed, limiting who handles cash, updating its internal controls, reporting shortages, and putting vendor arrangements under proper contracts.
“However, NCPFC needs to improve its controls over monitoring and reconciling accounts receivable; recording custodial accounts and disposing of old escrow accounts in accordance with the statutes; complying with Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989 as it relates to conducting periodic risk assessments and reporting of any variances to the Office of the State Auditor; and following Trial Court protocol over public use vending machine contracts.”
The report recommends that the court review old accounts, transfer unclaimed property when required, get guidance from the Trial Court, strengthen cash and internal control procedures, report shortages, and fix vendor contracting.
“NCPFC should review the ages of all the accounts in its custody to determine which accounts should be transferred to OST as unclaimed property; it should make this review a priority.”
The dollar amounts were not trivial: auditors found more than half a million dollars in custodial accounts that were not properly maintained, including more than $436,000 that might have qualified as abandoned property.
“Custodial accounts totaling $545,256 were not being properly maintained, including $436,582 for cases that could have been eligible to be forwarded to OST as abandoned property.”
Custodial accounts are money the court holds for someone else, often because the person is a minor or cannot be found when a probate matter is settled.
“These accounts are considered assets held in trust by NCPFC and are kept in the custody of the Register of Probate.”
10 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Whether custodial account assets are current or should be transferred to the Office of the State Treasurer in accordance with state law and Trial Court policies.
- Complied Whether NCPFC is complying with laws and regulations pertaining to the waiver of fees as well as to the type and number of cases involving waived fees.
- Did not comply Whether NCPFC is complying with Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989, An Act Relative to Improving the Internal Controls within State Agencies.
- Complied Whether NCPFC’s case records are adequately secured and protected.
- Partially Whether NCPFC has adequate internal controls over financial and fund management activities related to the collection, accounting, and depositing of all fees and assessments.
- Did not comply Whether the court is managing accounts receivable in accordance with established guidelines.
- Partially The status of the issues identified in our prior audit of NCPFC and any other internal audits affecting the current audit objectives.
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Funds were at risk of fraud, theft, and abuse, and beneficiaries might not be notified or receive the full amount owed.
Standard: Chapter 200A of the General Laws; Chapter 206, Section 25 of the General Laws; Section 10.15 of the Trial Court’s Fiscal Systems Manual. ( Chapter 206, Section 25, of the General Laws; Chapter 200A, Section 6, of the General Laws; Section 10.15 of the Fiscal Systems Manual )
2 recommendations
- NCPFC should review the ages of all the accounts in its custody to determine which accounts should be transferred to OST as unclaimed property; it should make this review a priority.
- NCPFC should seek direction from the Trial Court on how to enter old cases with limited information or missing case docket information into MassCourts and should make the posting of interest to custodial accounts a priority.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "NCPFC acknowledges that some of its custodial accounts would be more appropriately addressed by forwarding said accounts to OST and will do so upon receipt of sufficient instruction by appropriate authorized personnel."
Auditor: "We reiterate our recommendation to update all accounts annually, at a minimum."
Why it matters: The court could not ensure its accounts receivable balance was accurate, leaving accounts vulnerable to loss and misuse and reducing its ability to collect money owed.
Standard: Section 5 of the Trial Court’s Fiscal Systems Manual and the Trial Court’s Fiscal Integrity Protocols. ( Section 5 (Case Management) of the Fiscal Systems Manual; Trial Court Fiscal Integrity Protocols )
2 recommendations
- NCPFC should ensure that it reconciles the COOR with the MassCourts amounts in accordance with Trial Court requirements.
- NCPFC should request guidance from the Trial Court on how to enter the 55 bad-check accounts in MassCourts.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Proper maintenance of the COOR report, is time consuming and staffing levels do not allow for a thorough weekly review of said report."
Auditor: "We reiterate our recommendation that the court work with the Trial Court to address the reconciliation of the COOR to MassCourts, including updating the records to reflect the old bad checks in the court’s possession."
Why it matters: Cash was at risk of fraud, theft, or loss, and the lack of an audit trail prevented the court from confirming that collections were properly deposited.
Standard: Section 1 of the Trial Court’s Fiscal Systems Manual. ( Section 1 of the Fiscal Systems Manual )
3 recommendations
- Emphasize to staff the importance of segregation of duties by limiting the cashiering function to primary and backup cashiers designated by the court’s management.agency: already implemented
- Train additional court employees to properly perform the responsibilities of designated cashiers.agency: already implemented
- Train the appropriate employees on the correct procedures for entering manual cash receipts in the corresponding case dockets maintained in MassCourts.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "NCPFC has doubled the number of staff trained as cashiers from two (2) employees to four (4)."
Why it matters: The court lacked adequate documented controls over key operations and did not report shortages as required.
Standard: Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989 and Trial Court Internal Control Guidelines. ( Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989 )
2 recommendations
- The Register’s Office should ensure that its internal control plan addresses the risks and internal control requirements specific to all fiscal, administrative, and, if applicable, program operations.
- NCPFC should report all unaccounted-for variances, losses, shortages, or thefts of funds or property to OSA as required by Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Register Patrick W. McDermott has drafted an Internal Control Plan (dated October 2013), and will continue to address a risk assessment of our fiscal operations to be included in this year’s revised Internal Control Manual."
Auditor: "We reiterate our recommendation that the court follow the established criteria and immediately notify OSA upon occurrence of such issues."
Why it matters: Vendors operated in the court without contracts, and the court and Commonwealth received no benefit from the arrangements.
Standard: Trial Court procurement policies for vending-machine contracts.
2 recommendations
- NCPFC should review its procurement policies for vendor contracts to ensure that they benefit the court and the Commonwealth and prevent vendors from operating in the court without contracts.agency: partially agreed
- In addition, NCPFC should amend its existing vending-machine arrangements to solicit bids, compare the value of commission revenue against other benefits in return for permitting vendors to operate in the court, and procure the most advantageous vendor contracts.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "NCPFC acknowledges that its copier and soda machines are currently not covered under any active contracts."
Auditor: "We commend the Register for initiating a bidding process for the public copy machines, and we reiterate our recommendation to solicit bids, compare the value of commission revenue against other benefits of permitting vendors to operate in the court, and procure the most advantageous vendor and to do the same for the soda/snack vendor."
Verified dollar findings
Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.
Prior findings revisited
"Our current audit revealed that NCPFC still has not adequately updated its internal control plan or conducted a risk assessment and did not report two cash shortages to OSA."
"We consider this matter resolved."