Municipal Police Training Committee
October 17, 2016 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Municipal Police Training Committee, covering July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015.
“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015.”
The auditor reviewed selected parts of MPTC’s work, including police training applications, training exemptions and waivers, training records, refunds, and inventory safeguards.
“In this performance audit, we examined certain MPTC activities related to the application process; permanent exemptions and temporary waivers from basic training academy; maintenance of basic training records; the process to refund fees to people who pay for, but do not receive, training; and the safeguarding of inventory.”
MPTC helps set and deliver training for municipal police officers across Massachusetts, so weaknesses in its operations can affect police training oversight and accountability.
“Each year, MPTC administers and delivers training programs to the Commonwealth’s more than 20,000 police officers.”
For residents, the key issue is whether police officers are properly trained and whether public equipment and reporting are being managed responsibly.
“Without the training, these police officers may not be aware of the General Laws, and they cannot enforce laws they are unaware of.”
The auditor found that MPTC met some requirements, but failed in four areas: involving nonvoting board members, filing a required report, ensuring timely orientation training, and maintaining inventory controls.
“MPTC has still not resolved deficiencies in its inventory process.”
The report recommends that MPTC improve its policies, reporting, staff training, and inventory procedures; MPTC’s responses say it planned or had begun corrective steps.
“MPTC should ensure that its departments conduct annual physical inventory counts, tag all inventory items, notify the MPTC procurement officer when items are moved or discarded, and update the inventory list as necessary.”
The audit points to a larger gap: MPTC did not have full authority to certify or decertify officers, and it could not fully track all officers or their complete training histories.
“Unlike state POST Commissions, MPTC does not have the ability to set minimum hiring standards or the authority to certify or decertify police officers.”
MPTC is the state body responsible for developing and enforcing training standards for many police officers in Massachusetts. POST Commission status would mean broader authority over police hiring standards and officer certification.
“POST Commissions are typically state agencies with authority to regulate standards for the hiring, retention, and training of police officers and to certify, or license, officers.”
1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Complied Does MPTC accept full-time police-officer candidates to MPTC-operated academies in accordance with Section 3.06 of Title 550 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR)?
- Did not comply Does MPTC process exemptions to, and waivers of, training requirements in compliance with 550 CMR 3.03?
- Complied Does MPTC maintain adequate records to ensure that part-time and full-time student officers receive the required basic training in accordance with 550 CMR before graduation?
- Complied Does MPTC follow authoritative guidance on refunds to student officers who withdraw?
- Did not comply Does MPTC have adequate internal controls over inventory?
- Did not comply Does MPTC submit the required annual status report of recruit training to the Massachusetts House and Senate Committees on Ways and Means?
- Did not comply Has MPTC implemented measures to ensure active participation of its board members, both voting and nonvoting, in accordance with Section 116 of Chapter 6 of the General Laws?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: MPTC was not benefiting from the unique knowledge, skills, and expertise of its nonvoting members in developing and administering its training programs.
Standard: Section 117 of Chapter 6 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires MPTC to meet regularly and inform nonvoting advisory members of meeting dates and times. ( Section 117 of Chapter 6 of the Massachusetts General Laws )
2 recommendations
- MPTC should establish formal policies and procedures to ensure that its nonvoting members are properly identified and notified of all meetings. It should seek to create and maintain a culture of expecting all board members to participate.agency: agreed
- MPTC should work with Executive Office of Public Safety and Security and the Governor to revisit the legislated number and titles of committee members, if necessary.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "I concur that full participation can lead to broader discussions and more informed decisions."
Why it matters: The committees did not have report information, such as cost per recruit or per class, that could justify budgetary requests.
Standard: Chapter 38 of the Acts of 2013 and Chapter 165 of the Acts of 2014 required MPTC to submit an annual status report. ( Chapter 38 of the Acts of 2013 and Chapter 165 of the Acts of 2014 )
1 recommendation
- MPTC should develop policies and procedures to ensure the proper filing of this report.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The MPTC is in the process of hiring a fulltime budget director, and this will not only be included in their job duties, it will also be included in their performance plan and evaluation."
Why it matters: There was a higher-than-acceptable risk of undetected loss, theft, or misuse of equipment, and MPTC’s inventory valuation may not have been accurate.
Standard: MPTC’s internal control plan required qualifying equipment to be tagged, recorded, maintained, updated, and annually inventoried. ( MPTC internal control plan )
1 recommendation
- MPTC should ensure that its departments conduct annual physical inventory counts, tag all inventory items, notify the MPTC procurement officer when items are moved or discarded, and update the inventory list as necessary.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The executive director assumes full responsibility for this deficiency, especially in light of it being identified as an issue in the previous audit."
Prior findings revisited
"In our prior audit of MPTC (No. 2011-0053-3S), we found that the committee lacked adequate internal controls over its inventory of property and equipment."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Municipal Police Training Committee , including the prior audits referenced above.
- Audit of the Municipal Police Training Committee (December 26, 2024)Other · December 26, 2024