Middlesex Human Service Agency
MAY 31, 2010 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“We found, however, that during fiscal years 2007 and 2008, MHSA billed and received payments against this contract totaling $37,949 for the payroll costs associated with two employees who we determined did not work in this program.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
The audit checked whether the agency had proper controls and whether the costs it charged to the state were allowed, documented, approved, and recorded correctly.
“Reviewing the expenses that MHSA billed against its state contracts funding these two shelter programs and determining if these expenses were reasonable; allowable; properly allocated; properly authorized and recorded; and in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.”
Public money was supposed to reimburse only real shelter-program costs, but the audit found costs charged to the state that were not supported and should be paid back.
“This $37,949 in expenses represents nonreimbursable costs against these contracts and MHSA should return these funds to the Commonwealth.”
If you are a Massachusetts resident, this report is about whether taxpayer-funded shelter services were billed properly and whether the state had enough records to monitor services.
“However, this attendance information is used by the DTA to monitor program information including the overall demand for shelter program services.”
The agency admitted the accounting mistake, said it hired a CPA to help with accounting, and agreed to pay back the $37,949 when asked.
“MHSA also agrees to submit the payment of $37,949, to the State when requested to do so.”
The auditor recommended repayment and stronger controls, and the agency said it changed procedures for keeping daily bed lists for seven years.
“Based on their recommendations on September 13, 2010, we have implemented a new Policy and Procedure for the daily bed lists at both shelters.”
The audit is significant because it found both a specific dollar amount that should be returned and a recordkeeping problem that affected the state’s ability to verify shelter attendance.
“Specifically, it could not provide us with documentation to support the number of consumers it reported it served in its Bristol Lodge Men’s Shelter program during our audit period.”
“Nonreimbursable costs” means costs the state should not pay back because they were not properly documented or did not belong to the program.
“Costs which are not adequately documented in the light of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants statements on auditing standards for evidential matters.”
3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Partially Determining whether MHSA had implemented effective internal controls over the areas reviewed.
- Did not comply Reviewing whether expenses billed against state contracts for the two shelter programs were reasonable, allowable, properly allocated, properly authorized and recorded, and in compliance with laws, rules, and regulations.
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: The Commonwealth paid $37,949 in nonreimbursable costs that should be returned.
Standard: 808 Code of Massachusetts Regulations 1.05(26), which makes inadequately documented costs non-reimbursable under state contracts. ( 808 Code of Massachusetts Regulations 1.05(26) )
1 recommendation
- MHSA should remit $37,949 to DTA and ensure that it only charges allowable costs to state contracts in the future.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MHSA admits to accounting errors for this amount."
Why it matters: Without intake records or bed lists, MHSA could not substantiate all reported shelter attendance information used by the state to monitor demand for shelter services.
Standard: Commonwealth Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services, section seven, requiring records to be retained for at least seven years. ( Commonwealth Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services, section seven )
1 recommendation
- MHSA should implement policies and procedures to obtain intake information for all shelter consumers and retain intake information for at least seven years.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In response to this finding, MHSA concurs."
Auditor: "We believe the actions taken by MHSA relative to this matter were appropriate and responsive to our concerns."