Melrose Housing Authority
July 2, 2015 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“We did not identify any significant deficiencies in those areas.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Melrose Housing Authority covering January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.
“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, and conclusions for the audit period, January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.”
The State Auditor reviewed selected parts of the housing authority’s finances, tenant processes, maintenance, procurement, contracts, and related-party transactions.
“In performing this audit, we reviewed and assessed selected financial and management activities of the Authority, such as financial operations, tenant eligibility, rent determinations, site inspections and maintenance services, cost allocations, compliance with the Department of Housing and Community Development’s reporting requirements, procurement of goods and services, contracting and leasing, and related-party transactions.”
The authority manages public housing and federal housing vouchers, so its controls affect housing services for elderly tenants, low-income families, special-needs tenants, and voucher users.
“The Authority manages and oversees 305 units of state housing for elderly tenants, 17 units of state scattered-site housing for low-income families, and one eight-bedroom home for special-needs tenants.”
If you live in Melrose or care about public housing oversight, the report says the authority’s reviewed operations were working adequately, but it also flags that a related nonprofit needed to fix an affordability restriction issue.
“The Authority should monitor MAHC’s progress in complying with the deed restrictions required by Chapter 130 and require a refund of the invested proceeds if the affordability restrictions are not followed.”
The auditor’s main conclusion was positive: the housing authority had adequate controls and practices in the areas tested.
“Based on our audit, we have concluded that the Melrose Housing Authority has established adequate management controls and practices in the areas reviewed that were related to our audit objectives.”
The housing authority said it would work with the Melrose Affordable Housing Corporation to bring the matter into compliance with the law.
“The MHA will work with MAHC to take appropriate steps that will bring it into compliance with Chapter 130.”
The important concern is that MAHC used sale proceeds connected to public housing property, but did not file the required affordability restriction under the 2012 law.
“MAHC did not file an affordability restriction in compliance with Chapter 130 but rather relied on the restriction required by NSC.”
MAHC means the Melrose Affordable Housing Corporation, a nonprofit connected to affordable housing work in Melrose.
“MAHC is a nonprofit corporation organized under Chapter 180 of the Massachusetts General Laws to provide affordable housing in Melrose.”
3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Complied Did the Authority have adequate controls over financial operations in the following areas: administrative expenditures, subsidy calculations, accounts receivable and rent collections, cash management, and development and modernization funds?
- Complied Did the Authority determine tenant eligibility, placement, and monthly rent in accordance with the Department of Housing and Community Development’s (DHCD’s) regulations?
- Complied Were the Authority’s procedures, such as site inspections and maintenance/repairs, adequate to ensure that housing units met safety and sanitation requirements and that units were filled in accordance with DHCD guidelines?
- Complied Did the Authority allocate shared costs under a plan that reflected an equitable distribution between state and federal programs?
- Complied Did the Authority comply with DHCD’s financial reporting and data collection requirements?
- Complied Did the Authority have adequate controls over procurement of goods and services?
- Complied Did the Authority have adequate controls over contracting and leasing?
- Partially Did transactions with related parties comply with applicable laws, rules, and regulations?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: The restriction allowed one market-rate unit and expired after fixed terms, creating a risk that MAHC would have to repay invested sale proceeds to the Authority.
Standard: Section 4(b) of Chapter 130 of the Acts of 2012 ( Section 4(b) of Chapter 130 of the Acts of 2012 )
1 recommendation
- The Authority should monitor MAHC’s progress in complying with the deed restrictions required by Chapter 130 and require a refund of the invested proceeds if the affordability restrictions are not followed.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The MHA will work with MAHC to take appropriate steps that will bring it into compliance with Chapter 130."