Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Melrose Housing Authority

July 2, 2015 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published July 2, 2015 Audit covers January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the Melrose Housing Authority generally had proper controls in the areas reviewed, with no significant deficiencies found.
source
“We did not identify any significant deficiencies in those areas.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Melrose Housing Authority covering January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, and conclusions for the audit period, January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.”
Why was it audited?

The State Auditor reviewed selected parts of the housing authority’s finances, tenant processes, maintenance, procurement, contracts, and related-party transactions.

“In performing this audit, we reviewed and assessed selected financial and management activities of the Authority, such as financial operations, tenant eligibility, rent determinations, site inspections and maintenance services, cost allocations, compliance with the Department of Housing and Community Development’s reporting requirements, procurement of goods and services, contracting and leasing, and related-party transactions.”
Why it matters

The authority manages public housing and federal housing vouchers, so its controls affect housing services for elderly tenants, low-income families, special-needs tenants, and voucher users.

“The Authority manages and oversees 305 units of state housing for elderly tenants, 17 units of state scattered-site housing for low-income families, and one eight-bedroom home for special-needs tenants.”
What's in it for me?

If you live in Melrose or care about public housing oversight, the report says the authority’s reviewed operations were working adequately, but it also flags that a related nonprofit needed to fix an affordability restriction issue.

“The Authority should monitor MAHC’s progress in complying with the deed restrictions required by Chapter 130 and require a refund of the invested proceeds if the affordability restrictions are not followed.”
The bottom line

The auditor’s main conclusion was positive: the housing authority had adequate controls and practices in the areas tested.

“Based on our audit, we have concluded that the Melrose Housing Authority has established adequate management controls and practices in the areas reviewed that were related to our audit objectives.”
What happens next

The housing authority said it would work with the Melrose Affordable Housing Corporation to bring the matter into compliance with the law.

“The MHA will work with MAHC to take appropriate steps that will bring it into compliance with Chapter 130.”
Why it's significant

The important concern is that MAHC used sale proceeds connected to public housing property, but did not file the required affordability restriction under the 2012 law.

“MAHC did not file an affordability restriction in compliance with Chapter 130 but rather relied on the restriction required by NSC.”
Jargon, unpacked

MAHC means the Melrose Affordable Housing Corporation, a nonprofit connected to affordable housing work in Melrose.

“MAHC is a nonprofit corporation organized under Chapter 180 of the Massachusetts General Laws to provide affordable housing in Melrose.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

MAHC did not file the perpetual affordability restriction required by Chapter 130.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The restriction allowed one market-rate unit and expired after fixed terms, creating a risk that MAHC would have to repay invested sale proceeds to the Authority.

Standard: Section 4(b) of Chapter 130 of the Acts of 2012 ( Section 4(b) of Chapter 130 of the Acts of 2012 )

1 recommendation
  • The Authority should monitor MAHC’s progress in complying with the deed restrictions required by Chapter 130 and require a refund of the invested proceeds if the affordability restrictions are not followed.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The MHA will work with MAHC to take appropriate steps that will bring it into compliance with Chapter 130."