Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission
May 12, 2011 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state audit of the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, covering July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010.
“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor conducted an audit of the MRC for the period July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010.”
The State Auditor reviewed whether MRC had proper controls, followed federal and state rules, and fixed issues from a prior audit.
“Specifically, our objectives were to:”
The agency handles major public funds and programs for people with disabilities, so weak controls can mean payroll or grant money is not properly checked.
“Without supervisory approval signatures, management lacks an appropriate level of assurance that payroll expenditures are valid and accurate, that programs are being charged only for the time an employee works on the program, and that payroll transactions are being approved in accordance with prescribed procedures.”
For residents, this matters because MRC’s work affects people with disabilities who need help living independently, getting jobs, or qualifying for disability benefits.
“Chapter 6, Section 74, of the Massachusetts General Laws established the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission (MRC), whose primary mission is to help permanently disabled individuals live as independently as possible.”
MRC improved on eligibility decisions, but the audit still questioned costs tied to missing approvals and incorrect cost allocations.
“As a result, our audit disclosed $16,170 in questioned costs due to the incorrect allocation of central supportive services to the VR grant.”
The report says MRC should keep improving controls, train staff, document procedures, and make sure costs and reports are handled correctly.
“The MRC must continue to improve and strengthen its internal controls to ensure the accuracy of VR program accounting and reporting and compliance with federal requirements.”
The report is significant because MRC received about $97.1 million in fiscal year 2010, mostly federal money, so mistakes could affect federal compliance and public trust.
“For fiscal year 2010, the MRC received approximately $97.1 million in appropriations, approximately $78.8 million of which consisted of federal funds, including approximately $1.4 million in VR American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding.”
In plain terms, “internal controls” are the checks that make sure records are reviewed, costs are charged correctly, and reports are accurate before money is spent or reported.
“Additionally, all reports should be reviewed by management for accuracy, completeness, support for reported financial and statistical information, and overall reasonableness.”
6 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Without supervisory approvals, management lacked assurance that payroll expenditures were valid, accurate, properly charged, and approved according to procedures.
Standard: OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8(h)(1); Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division Time and Attendance Policy. ( Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8(h)(1); Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division’s Time and Attendance Policy )
1 recommendation
- Continue to improve and strengthen internal controls so payroll transactions are approved according to prescribed procedures, including periodic monitoring reviews of area offices and related training.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MRC admits that the time sheets in question did not have the proper approvals."
Why it matters: The MRC risked submitting inaccurate, incomplete, or untimely financial reports, which could lead to federal enforcement action and possible recovery of Title I VR funds.
Standard: 34 Code of Federal Regulations 80.20 and 34 Code of Federal Regulations 361.12. ( 34 Code of Federal Regulations 80.20; 34 CFR 361.12 )
1 recommendation
- Improve internal controls over VR program accounting and reporting, establish policies and procedures for required reports, streamline RSA-2 documentation, cross-train staff, and require documented management review of reports.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MRC concurs with the recommendation and continues to document and implement policies and procedures to ensure that reports are submitted completely and accurately."
Why it matters: Costs that benefited other programs were charged to the federal VR grant, creating questioned costs and risk of noncompliance with federal cost allocation rules.
Standard: OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C(3); 34 CFR 361.63. ( OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C(3); 34 CFR 361.63 )
1 recommendation
- Document policies and procedures, implement controls so chargebacks are allocated according to relative benefits received, verify proper use of VR program income with RSA, and allocate remaining residual costs correctly.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MRC’s allocation plan for EOHHS chargebacks is based upon information at the beginning of the federal fiscal year; however, MRC concurs that $2,647 was incorrectly overcharged to the VR program as the questioned cost."
Verified dollar findings
Costs the audit could not support as allowable, pending the entity's response.
Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.
Prior findings revisited
"Our follow-up review disclosed that the MRC has taken the necessary corrective action to resolve this issue."
"Our follow-up review disclosed that the MRC has implemented internal controls designed to ensure that all employee timesheets are reviewed and approved by the employee’s supervisor."
"Our follow-up review disclosed that although the MRC is making progress in documenting support to back up financial and statistical data reported on its annual RSA-2 report, additional work remains to be done."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission , including the prior audits referenced above.
- Single Audit of the Commonwealth - Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission (MRC)Authority / Commission · May 17, 2012
- Audit of the Massachusetts Rehabilitation CommissionAuthority / Commission · July 3, 2018
- Audit of the Massachusetts Rehabilitation CommissionAuthority / Commission · January 6, 2023