Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission

May 12, 2011 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published May 12, 2011 Audit covers July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, covering July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010.

“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor conducted an audit of the MRC for the period July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010.”
Why was it audited?

The State Auditor reviewed whether MRC had proper controls, followed federal and state rules, and fixed issues from a prior audit.

“Specifically, our objectives were to:”
Why it matters

The agency handles major public funds and programs for people with disabilities, so weak controls can mean payroll or grant money is not properly checked.

“Without supervisory approval signatures, management lacks an appropriate level of assurance that payroll expenditures are valid and accurate, that programs are being charged only for the time an employee works on the program, and that payroll transactions are being approved in accordance with prescribed procedures.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, this matters because MRC’s work affects people with disabilities who need help living independently, getting jobs, or qualifying for disability benefits.

“Chapter 6, Section 74, of the Massachusetts General Laws established the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission (MRC), whose primary mission is to help permanently disabled individuals live as independently as possible.”
The bottom line

MRC improved on eligibility decisions, but the audit still questioned costs tied to missing approvals and incorrect cost allocations.

“As a result, our audit disclosed $16,170 in questioned costs due to the incorrect allocation of central supportive services to the VR grant.”
What happens next

The report says MRC should keep improving controls, train staff, document procedures, and make sure costs and reports are handled correctly.

“The MRC must continue to improve and strengthen its internal controls to ensure the accuracy of VR program accounting and reporting and compliance with federal requirements.”
Why it's significant

The report is significant because MRC received about $97.1 million in fiscal year 2010, mostly federal money, so mistakes could affect federal compliance and public trust.

“For fiscal year 2010, the MRC received approximately $97.1 million in appropriations, approximately $78.8 million of which consisted of federal funds, including approximately $1.4 million in VR American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding.”
Jargon, unpacked

In plain terms, “internal controls” are the checks that make sure records are reviewed, costs are charged correctly, and reports are accurate before money is spent or reported.

“Additionally, all reports should be reviewed by management for accuracy, completeness, support for reported financial and statistical information, and overall reasonableness.”
Identified in this audit - source-verified
$137,255

6 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor found

Employee timesheets and payroll documents were not always reviewed and approved by supervisors.
payroll/timeinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: Without supervisory approvals, management lacked assurance that payroll expenditures were valid, accurate, properly charged, and approved according to procedures.

Standard: OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8(h)(1); Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division Time and Attendance Policy. ( Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B, Section 8(h)(1); Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division’s Time and Attendance Policy )

1 recommendation
  • Continue to improve and strengthen internal controls so payroll transactions are approved according to prescribed procedures, including periodic monitoring reviews of area offices and related training.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MRC admits that the time sheets in question did not have the proper approvals."
Financial reporting controls and documentation were inadequate for federal vocational rehabilitation reports.
grants managementreporting timelinessrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The MRC risked submitting inaccurate, incomplete, or untimely financial reports, which could lead to federal enforcement action and possible recovery of Title I VR funds.

Standard: 34 Code of Federal Regulations 80.20 and 34 Code of Federal Regulations 361.12. ( 34 Code of Federal Regulations 80.20; 34 CFR 361.12 )

1 recommendation
  • Improve internal controls over VR program accounting and reporting, establish policies and procedures for required reports, streamline RSA-2 documentation, cross-train staff, and require documented management review of reports.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MRC concurs with the recommendation and continues to document and implement policies and procedures to ensure that reports are submitted completely and accurately."
Central supportive service chargebacks were incorrectly allocated to the federal Vocational Rehabilitation grant.
grants managementinternal controlsprocurement/contracts

Why it matters: Costs that benefited other programs were charged to the federal VR grant, creating questioned costs and risk of noncompliance with federal cost allocation rules.

Standard: OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C(3); 34 CFR 361.63. ( OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C; OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A, Section C(3); 34 CFR 361.63 )

1 recommendation
  • Document policies and procedures, implement controls so chargebacks are allocated according to relative benefits received, verify proper use of VR program income with RSA, and allocate remaining residual costs correctly.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MRC’s allocation plan for EOHHS chargebacks is based upon information at the beginning of the federal fiscal year; however, MRC concurs that $2,647 was incorrectly overcharged to the VR program as the questioned cost."

Verified dollar findings

Questioned costs $137,255

Costs the audit could not support as allowable, pending the entity's response.

$121,085 - questioned costs
$16,170 - questioned costs
Other identified $21,633,342 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$12,129,549 - expenditure reporting deficiencies
$9,503,793 - unreported federal unliquidated obligations

Prior findings revisited

Fixed
"Our follow-up review disclosed that the MRC has taken the necessary corrective action to resolve this issue."
Still a problem
"Our follow-up review disclosed that the MRC has implemented internal controls designed to ensure that all employee timesheets are reviewed and approved by the employee’s supervisor."
Being worked on
"Our follow-up review disclosed that although the MRC is making progress in documenting support to back up financial and statistical data reported on its annual RSA-2 report, additional work remains to be done."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission , including the prior audits referenced above.

See this entity's page with all 4 audits →