Massachusetts Department of Veterans' Services
September 20, 2017 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“DVS provided $26,909 in reimbursements to cities and towns for benefits to veterans and/or their dependents after their deaths.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Department of Veterans’ Services, covering July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2016.
“In this performance audit, we examined DVS activities related to the administration of veteran benefits, veteran community outreach, and compliance with certification and education requirements for veterans’ services officers (VSOs).”
Auditors looked at whether DVS was properly handling veterans’ benefits and whether local veterans’ services officers were trained and certified as required.
“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer, the conclusion we reached regarding each objective, and where each objective is discussed in the audit findings.”
The issues matter because veterans and their families depend on these benefits, and weak controls can lead to wrong payments or veterans not knowing whether they are getting the right benefits.
“Although we did not identify any instances where veterans who were deemed eligible did not receive benefits, those who do not receive NODs may not know whether they are receiving the correct level of benefits or whether they began receiving their benefits on the appropriate start date and therefore would not know that this information should be corrected.”
If you are a veteran or family member in Massachusetts, this audit is about whether the state and local offices are doing enough to help you understand and receive benefits you may qualify for.
“In partnership with VSOs, DVS helps veterans and their families navigate available federal, state, and local programs, benefits, and other resources.”
The auditor found that DVS needed better checks: to stop payments after death, to make sure veterans get written benefit notices, and to ensure local officers complete required training and exams.
“DVS does not ensure that veterans receive an explanation of their benefits.”
DVS said it would recover the improper reimbursements, start checking death data monthly, require signed benefit notices, and offer more regional training options.
“DVS is notifying them that the overpayments will be deducted from their next reimbursement scheduled for September 30, 2017.”
The audit suggests DVS could use available data better to reach veterans who may qualify for help, including thousands of MassHealth recipients who identified as veterans and might qualify based on income.
“Our analysis of this information found, of the remaining 12,219 veterans, an additional 7,938 who might qualify for Chapter 115 veteran benefits based on their income levels and are not currently served by DVS.”
A VSO is a local veterans’ services officer who helps veterans apply for and understand benefits; an NOD is the written notice explaining a benefit decision; Chapter 115 benefits are needs-based help for living costs and medical assistance.
“VSOs are appointed by the mayors or boards of selectmen in cities and towns to accept applications from veterans or their dependents, determine their eligibility for benefits, and file requests for federal benefits.”
1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Is the DVS eligibility determination process effective in its administration of benefits and the issuance of Notices of Determination (NODs) to veterans?
- Did not comply Have all veterans’ services officers (VSOs) completed the mandatory annual training provided by DVS, and are they currently certified to assist veterans in accessing benefits and services, as required by Chapter 115 of the General Laws?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Municipalities received reimbursements to which they were not entitled, resulting in improper state payments.
Standard: Section 13.02(1) of Title 108 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations requires DVS to allow and endorse only amounts properly paid by a municipality. ( Section 13.02(1) of Title 108 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations )
2 recommendations
- DVS should collaborate with cities and towns to have them repay the $26,909 of improper reimbursements they received.agency: agreed
- DVS should develop a procedure to compare databases containing lists of benefit recipients with the DMF to identify recipients who have died and ensure that benefits are not paid after death.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DVS identified the cities and towns that received the improper reimbursements."
Why it matters: Veterans may not know whether they are receiving the correct benefit amount or whether benefits began on the correct start date.
Standard: 108 CMR 5.01(3) requires VSOs to provide written notification to veterans on initial application and each recertification explaining benefit determinations. ( 108 CMR 5.01(3) )
1 recommendation
- DVS should develop monitoring controls to ensure that veterans receive NODs so they have an opportunity to review their benefit eligibility decisions.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DVS is in the process of notifying all Veteran Service Officers (“VSO”), in writing, that effective August 1, 2017, new applicants must sign and be provided with a copy of the NOD."
Why it matters: These VSOs may not provide the intended level of service to veterans seeking benefits and services.
Standard: Section 3B(b) of Chapter 115 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires each VSO to attend mandatory annual training and pass the test once every three years. ( Section 3B(b) of Chapter 115 of the Massachusetts General Laws )
2 recommendations
- DVS should explore the possibility of developing alternative training opportunities for VSOs who find it difficult to participate in the annual onsite or online training.agency: agreed
- DVS should continue to notify the communities whose VSOs have not met the training and certification requirements and ask them to work with the VSOs on addressing this issue as soon as possible.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DVS recognizes that some geographic locations within Massachusetts are unable to participate in online training offered by DVS due to lack of internet bandwidth."