Massachusetts Convention Center Authority
MARCH 31, 1999 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“Our follow-up review noted that the MCCA had resolved these issues, as follows.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority, the public body that runs the Hynes Convention Center, Boston Common Parking Garage, and helps oversee convention center projects in Massachusetts.
“The Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (MCCA) was established by Chapter 190 of the Acts of 1982 and Chapter 152 of the Acts of 1997 to acquire and operate the John B. Hynes Veterans Memorial Convention Center and the Boston Common Parking Garage, as well as to oversee the construction and financing of additional convention and exhibition centers in the Commonwealth.”
Auditors reviewed whether the authority was operating efficiently, had proper controls over money, contracts, inventory, rentals, costs, and employee costs, and whether it fixed problems from an earlier audit.
“The objectives of this performance audit were to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the MCCA’s operations over cash management systems, inventory control, contract management systems, rental of the convention center facilities, operations costs, and employee costs, and to follow-up on prior audit results.”
The authority handles major public facilities and public money, including large convention center projects, so weak controls can affect taxpayers, public services, and confidence in state oversight.
“The Acts of 1997 appropriated $609,400,000 for the Commonwealth’s share of the planning, financing, development, and construction of the South Boston Convention Center Project and $48,500,000 for the expansion, renovation, and construction of a civic and convention center located on the site of the present Springfield Civic Center.”
For residents, the main concern is whether public agencies follow fair bidding rules, avoid unnecessary costs, and protect public assets from loss or misuse.
“As a result, the MCCA was unable to ensure the validity of its perpetual inventory records or to ensure that its fixed-asset inventory was safeguarded against loss, theft, or misuse.”
The auditors said the authority should follow its own bidding and vacation policies, and improve how it tracks its fixed assets.
“The MCCA should improve its fixed-asset inventory controls by performing annual physical inventory inspections to verify the existence of its fixed assets, and by implementing a computerized system for tracking fixed assets and updating inventory records.”
The authority said it had completed a new food-service bidding process, would formalize vacation carryover approvals, and was continuing work on inventory controls.
“Since the completion of your field work, we have conducted and completed the bidding process for a new food services contract.”
The report shows mixed progress: old issues involving free event space, marketing spending, and retained earnings were resolved, but inventory controls remained unresolved and new problems were found in bidding and vacation buybacks.
“Our follow-up review revealed that the MCCA’s controls over its fixed-asset inventory were still deficient.”
“Perpetual inventory records” means the authority’s ongoing list of property it owns; the audit found that this list was not reliable enough because physical checks had not been done properly.
“MCCA officials stated that, with the exception of convention floor tables and chairs, the MCCA did not conduct periodic physical inspections of fixed assets to verify its perpetual inventory records.”
6 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Partially Determine the efficiency and effectiveness of MCCA operations, review and analyze selected financial and management controls, and update the status of prior audit results.
- Partially Determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the MCCA’s operations over cash management systems, inventory control, contract management systems, rental of the convention center facilities, operations costs, and employee costs, and follow up on prior audit results.
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: There was inadequate assurance that MCCA received the highest quality services at the lowest cost or generated the most revenue from the most qualified bidder.
Standard: MCCA competitive bidding policies require all professional service contracts greater than $10,000 to be publicly advertised for competitive bid. ( MCCA competitive bidding policies )
1 recommendation
- Competitively bid the concessionaire food service contract at the earliest possible date and competitively bid legal services in the future.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Since the completion of your field work, we have conducted and completed the bidding process for a new food services contract."
Auditor: "We recognize the MCCA’s concerns but the MCCA should comply with its own policies and procedures to competitively bid for legal services in the future as it relates to other matters and after the ongoing issues are disposed of."
Why it matters: The program created unsupported and excessive vacation buyback payments and undermined personnel policy controls.
Standard: MCCA Personnel Policies Manual and MCCA vacation buyback form requirements for written approval of excess vacation carryover and a maximum two-week annual buyback. ( MCCA Personnel Policies Manual; MCCA vacation buyback form )
1 recommendation
- Require approval to carry over accumulated vacation time in excess of one year and limit vacation buyback to two weeks per fiscal year.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Authority will insure that the approval process for the carry over of vacation time is formalized."
Auditor: "The MCCA should comply with its personnel policies in the future and should have voted to approve these exceptions to its policy."
Why it matters: The MCCA could not ensure the validity of its perpetual inventory records or safeguard fixed assets against loss, theft, or misuse.
Standard: Annual physical property inventory inspections and updated perpetual inventory records for additions and deletions of fixed assets.
1 recommendation
- Perform annual physical inventory inspections and implement a computerized fixed-asset tracking and inventory update system.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "As noted, all items have been tagged and we have begun using the Concentrics software for inventory."
Prior findings revisited
"Our follow-up review noted that the MCCA resolved these issues, as follows."
"It therefore appears that the MCCA has responded to our prior recommendation."
"Our follow-up review, using a judgmental sample of expenditures over $100 for fiscal year 1997, revealed no instances of questionable expenditures."
"After further review, we agree with the MCCA that funds in the retained earnings account are not revenue within the definition of Section 7 and thus do not have to be returned to the Commonwealth."
"Our follow-up review revealed that the MCCA’s controls over its fixed-asset inventory were still deficient."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Convention Center Authority , including the prior audits referenced above.
- Massachusetts Convention Center AuthorityAuthority / Commission · January 20, 2012
- Audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (MCCA)Authority / Commission · February 16, 2021
- Audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (August 19, 2024)Authority / Commission · August 19, 2024