Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Controls over Parking-Lot Revenue

October 8, 2015 · Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗ · official site ↗

Published October 8, 2015 Audit covers January 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the MBTA did not have strong enough controls over parking cash in 2013, especially keys to cash areas and records needed to check whether all parking money was collected.
source
“The objective of our audit was to determine whether the MBTA was properly safeguarding and accounting for all parking-lot revenue and was efficiently and effectively administering its parking-management contract.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a State Auditor performance audit of MBTA parking-lot revenue controls for January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors looked at whether the MBTA was properly protecting and accounting for parking money and overseeing its parking contractor.

“The objective of our audit was to determine whether the MBTA was properly safeguarding and accounting for all parking-lot revenue and was efficiently and effectively administering its parking-management contract.”
Why it matters

Parking brought in tens of millions of dollars, so weak controls could mean public money was not fully protected or verifiable.

“During fiscal year 2013, LAZ reported collecting $42.3 million in parking revenue.”
What's in it for me?

If you use or fund the MBTA, this matters because parking revenue supports the transit system and should be protected from loss or poor tracking.

“The MBTA serves 175 communities, providing transit alternatives to almost 4.8 million people over an area of 3,200 square miles.”
The bottom line

The MBTA had weaknesses in how it controlled parking-cash keys and how it checked daily cash from Honor Box lots against actual parking use.

“The MBTA lacked the necessary controls to reconcile daily parking revenue at Honor Box parking lots.”
What happens next

The MBTA had already ended the Honor Box cash system and said it was adding stronger key controls and considering ways to check parking-lot counts against revenue.

“Effective July 6, 2015, the MBTA replaced the Honor Box system with a system of pay-by-phone parking and monthly permits to eliminate the need to pay for parking with cash.”
Why it's significant

The most serious concern was that weak key controls affected access to more than $22 million in cash collected at parking facilities.

“The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority did not properly safeguard keys that permitted access to more than $22 million in cash collected at its parking facilities.”
Jargon, unpacked

An Honor Box was a cash box where drivers put money into a numbered slot matching their parking space; reconciliation means comparing cars parked with money collected.

“These Honor Boxes contained numbered slots that corresponded to the numbered parking spaces in each lot.”

2 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The MBTA did not properly safeguard keys that allowed access to parking revenue cash.
cash handlinginternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: The MBTA could not be certain that cash parking revenue was protected against theft or that all revenue earned was recorded.

Standard: National Parking Association recommended best practices for written controls over revenue keys and locks, including inventory, chain of custody, securing keys, and routine audits. ( National Parking Association’s recommended best practices )

Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The MBTA is in agreement that LAZ’ process dealing with damaged or lost keys needs improvement."
Auditor: "Based on its response, it appears that the MBTA is taking measures to address our concerns about its internal controls over revenue collected in its garages."
The MBTA lacked controls to reconcile daily parking revenue at Honor Box lots.
cash handlingrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The MBTA could not verify that revenue collected equaled the amount owed by users and may not have received all parking-lot revenue.

Standard: National Parking Association industry standards for parking-lot use and revenue controls, including mechanical and electronic controls to reconcile vehicle counts to actual revenue collected. ( National Parking Association industry standards )

1 recommendation
  • The MBTA should ensure that its revenue controls include a system that allows it to accurately reconcile the number of vehicles entering and exiting each lot to the actual revenue collected daily.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The MBTA is proposing a reasonable solution to satisfy [the recommendation on this issue]."
Auditor: "We believe that it is prudent for the MBTA to implement a system that ensures the accurate reconciliation of all vehicles entering and exiting these lots to the actual revenue collected daily."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority .

See this entity's page with all 11 audits →