Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Greenfield Housing Authority

October 2, 2012 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published October 2, 2012 Audit covers April 1, 2009 – March 31, 2011 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The auditor found Greenfield Housing Authority had fixed several past problems, but still needed to improve its written maintenance plan and clarify how a related nonprofit was shown in financial statements.
source
“Our current audit indicated that all of these deficiencies have been adequately addressed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of certain Greenfield Housing Authority activities from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011.

“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted an audit of certain activities of the Greenfield Housing Authority for the period April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011.”
Why was it audited?

The audit checked whether the housing authority followed rules, had adequate controls, and fixed problems found in an earlier audit.

“In addition, we reviewed the Authority’s progress in addressing the deficiencies noted in our prior audit report of the Authority (No. 2006-0669-3A).”
Why it matters

The audit matters because public housing units need to be kept safe, decent, and sanitary for residents.

“The goal of good property maintenance at a public housing authority is to serve the residents by assuring that the homes in which they live are decent, safe and sanitary . . . .”
What's in it for me?

For residents and taxpayers, the report says earlier sanitary-code problems were fixed and the authority received funding for maintenance and modernization work.

“During our current audit, we re-inspected each of the six units and found that the Authority’s maintenance staff had corrected each of the 11 deficiencies previously noted.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended adding annual unit inspections to the maintenance plan and having the independent auditor recheck how GHAI is treated in the financial statements.

“The Authority should amend its preventive maintenance plan to require annual inspections of the Authority’s dwelling units and upon each vacancy to ensure compliance with the minimum standards set forth in Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code.”
Why it's significant

The report is significant because it shows progress since the prior audit, but also flags two remaining accountability issues: required inspection language and accurate financial reporting.

“The Authority has made progress in addressing our prior audit results by correcting all instances of noncompliance with Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code, applying for and receiving additional funding for its maintenance projects, resolving discrepancies within its operating subsidy records, and identifying buildable lots to expand its housing capacity.”
Jargon, unpacked

A “component unit” means a legally separate organization that is closely enough tied to the authority that it may belong in the authority’s financial statements; the auditor said GHAI did not meet that test.

“Based on this, the OSA determined that the Authority and GHAI do not have the organizational and financial interrelationship that must exist to characterize GHAI as a component unit.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Prior audit deficiencies in sanitary code compliance, modernization funding, subsidy records, and land availability were resolved.
licensing/inspectionsgrants managementrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The Authority addressed previously identified issues affecting safe housing, modernization needs, subsidy records, and potential affordable housing development.

Standard: Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code; DHCD Property Maintenance Guide, Chapter 3(F); contract for financial assistance between the Authority and DHCD. ( Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code; DHCD Property Maintenance Guide, Chapter 3(F) )

Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Authority’s written comments indicate that it is in full agreement with the issues raised in our report and that it has updated some of its key operational policies as a result."
The Authority’s written property maintenance plan did not require annual unit inspections.
licensing/inspectionsrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: This limits the Authority’s ability to ensure that its units are consistently in compliance with the State Sanitary Code and could lead to untimely unit inspections and potential unit deterioration.

Standard: DHCD Property Maintenance Guide, Chapter 3(F); Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code. ( DHCD Property Maintenance Guide, Chapter 3(F); Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code )

1 recommendation
  • Add a provision to the property maintenance plan requiring annual and vacancy inspections of all dwelling units.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Authority’s written comments indicate that it is in full agreement with the issues raised in our report and that it has updated some of its key operational policies as a result."
Greenfield Housing Associates, Inc. was erroneously characterized as a component unit of the Authority in fiscal year 2009 financial statements.
reporting timelinessinternal controlsprocurement/contracts

Why it matters: The Authority’s financial statements may have misrepresented the organizational and financial relationship between the Authority and Greenfield Housing Associates, Inc.

Standard: Section 2100 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s Codification of Government Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards. ( Section 2100 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s Codification of Government Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards; M.G.L. c. 149, §§ 44A-J )

1 recommendation
  • The independent auditor should re-evaluate GHAI’s status to determine whether the Authority’s financial statements need revision.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Note 2 of the Notes to the Financial Statements for 2009 did state that GHAI was a component unit of the Authority, but we now believe that statement was erroneous."

Verified dollar findings

Other identified $3,123,350 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$926,500 - state modernization funds
$1,572,600 - extraordinary maintenance costs
$624,250 - ARRA funds

Prior findings revisited

Fixed
"Our current audit indicated that all of these deficiencies have been adequately addressed."
Being worked on
"Our current audit revealed that this issue has been partially resolved."