Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Executive Office of Elder Affairs' Use of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds

November 1, 2012 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published November 1, 2012 Audit covers July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2011 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the Executive Office of Elder Affairs generally handled federal stimulus money properly, but still needed to finish improving its internal controls and fraud-prevention work.
source
“Based on our audit we have concluded that, except for the issue addressed in the Audit Findings section of this report, for the period July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2011, the EOEA maintained adequate internal controls and complied with applicable laws, rules, and regulations for the areas tested.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor review of how the Executive Office of Elder Affairs received, spent, tracked, and reported federal ARRA stimulus funds.

“This audit was conducted as part of the Office of the State Auditor’s ongoing efforts to audit the receipt, administration, and disbursement of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) funds by state entities.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the money was spent for its intended purposes, followed rules, and was properly reported, including job reporting.

“The objectives of our audit were to obtain and review a listing of the type and amount of all American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) funds that the EOEA has applied for, plans to receive, or has received and expended; to review and evaluate the EOEA’s internal controls over ARRA expenditures and determine whether ARRA funds are being expended for the intended purposes and in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; to determine whether the EOEA is complying with ARRA accounting and reporting requirements as well as other grant requirements; and to ensure that the EOEA has identified and reported the number of jobs created/retained with ARRA funds.”
Why it matters

The agency used federal stimulus grants for programs serving older residents, including meals, employment help, and chronic disease self-management.

“During our audit period, the EOEA was awarded four separate grants totaling $3,753,352 by two federal agencies through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).”
What's in it for me?

For ordinary residents, this matters because the programs supported meals, caregiver support, employment training, and health-related services for older people and their families.

“This network reaches out to elders in need of such services as home care and caregiver support, ombudsman programs, nutrition programs, protective services, health and wellness services, housing options, and counseling services for elders with limited English proficiency.”
The bottom line

No major misuse of funds was reported in the areas tested, but the agency still had unfinished work on controls and fraud, waste, and abuse prevention.

“Our follow-up audit indicated that the EOEA had taken steps to address these issues but some remained partially resolved, as discussed below:”
What happens next

The auditor told the agency to finish its internal control plan and keep building a system to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse.

“The EOEA should continue to improve its program to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse.”
Why it's significant

The audit covered millions of dollars in federal aid and found the agency had spent most of the awarded amount by June 30, 2011.

“As of June 30, 2011, the EOEA had expended $3,158,259 of this amount, as indicated below.”
Jargon, unpacked

ARRA means the federal stimulus law passed during the recession; in this report, it funded extra elder-service programs such as meals and employment support.

“The ARRA grant supplemented other funds annually appropriated by the federal government (Title III) and the Commonwealth that support the EOEA’s Elderly Nutrition Program.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

EOEA had not fully completed its internal control plan or fraud, waste, and abuse prevention program.
internal controlsfraud/theftgrants management

Why it matters: Incomplete internal control planning and fraud prevention procedures increase the risk that ARRA funds could be misused or that control weaknesses would not be detected promptly.

Standard: Office of the State Comptroller internal control plan requirements and Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989 ( Chapter 647 of the Acts of 1989 )

2 recommendations
  • Complete its ICP in accordance with the OSC’s requirements.agency: no response
  • Continue to prepare a program to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse.agency: no response

Prior findings revisited

Fixed
"Our follow-up audit work in these areas indicated that EOEA had taken steps to address these issues, as discussed below:"
Being worked on
"Our follow-up audit indicated that the EOEA had taken steps to address these issues but some remained partially resolved, as discussed below:"