East Brookfield Division of the District Court Department-Review of Probation Supervision Fees: Transactions and Monitoring of Fulfillment by Probationers
February 22, 2016 · East Brookfield Division of the District Court Department · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“The court does not always waive monthly probation supervision fees as required or effectively track community service.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state audit report about how the East Brookfield District Court handled monthly probation supervision fees and community service for people on probation from July 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013.
“This report presents the results of our audit testing at EBDC specifically.”
The Auditor reviewed this court as part of a broader audit of whether Trial Court locations were properly assessing, recording, and monitoring probation supervision fees.
“Our overall audit of the Trial Court’s administration of PSFs (Report No. 2014-5160-3J) included audit testing at 16 district-court locations, including EBDC, to assess the process the Trial Court has established for PSFs, determine whether PSF-related transactions were properly documented in court records, and determine whether probationers were adequately monitored to ensure that they were fulfilling the PSF requirement.”
The issue matters because the law requires judges to charge probation fees unless they formally find that payment would be too hard for the probationer, in which case community service must be required instead.
“The PSF can be waived (in which case community service must be performed) upon order of the court after a finding of fact establishing that the probationer cannot pay the fee.”
For residents, this audit is about whether the court followed the rules for collecting public money or requiring community service, and whether the Commonwealth may have missed fee revenue that should have been paid.
“As a result, the Commonwealth may be forgoing PSFs that probationers would have been able to pay.”
The Auditor found two main problems: judges sometimes let probation officers choose between fees and community service without the required hardship finding, and the court did not track community service hours well enough in one central place.
“Some judges at the East Brookfield Division of the District Court Department (EBDC) allow a person’s probation officer to choose whether s/he should pay a monthly probation supervision fee (PSF) or perform community service, a procedure that is contrary to Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws.”
The Auditor recommended that the court document fee decisions properly, create a central way to track community service, and regularly report completed hours into MassCourts.
“EBDC should establish a centralized method of tracking community service performed.”
The audit found that the court transmitted $402,468 in probation supervision fees during the audit period, but that was about 77% of the estimated potential revenue after accounting for community service.
“Taking into account the number of individuals required to perform community service, EBDC’s actual transmittals were approximately 77% of the estimated potential PSF revenue.”
A probation supervision fee is a monthly charge for someone placed on probation; the report says it was $50 for administrative probation or $65 for supervised probation.
“When an individual is placed on probation, Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires courts to assess the individual a $50 (administrative) or $65 (supervised) monthly probation supervision fee (PSF).”
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Are PSFs assessed in the correct amounts, and when a PSF is waived, does the court record include a written finding that the fee would constitute an undue hardship that requires monthly community service instead?
- Complied Are PSF assessments properly recorded by the Clerk-Magistrate’s Office?
- Complied Are probation officers enforcing the requirement that probationers pay PSFs?
- Did not comply Is the performance of community service, when allowed by the court in lieu of monthly PSF payments, adequately tracked, promptly reported, and accurately recorded?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: The Commonwealth may forgo probation supervision fees that probationers would have been able to pay, and required hearings for nonpayment may be bypassed.
Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires a court-ordered waiver after a finding of fact establishing that the probationer cannot pay the fee. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )
1 recommendation
- EBDC should comply with the requirements of Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the General Laws for the imposition and waiving of PSFs and the restitution made for nonpayment.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "However, since my appointment as First Justice in December of 2013, I have asked that all of the judges assigned to sit in the East Brookfield District Court document a finding of fact hearing and where applicable a waiver by diligently using the existing Administrative Office of the District Court form on the Assessment or Waiver of Moneys in Criminal Case."
Why it matters: EBDC cannot readily determine how many community-service hours are owed, their dollar value, or whether offenders will satisfy court orders on schedule.
Standard: Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws requires monitoring of community service; best business practices require a centralized tracking system. ( Section 87A of Chapter 276 of the Massachusetts General Laws )
2 recommendations
- EBDC should establish a centralized method of tracking community service performed.
- The Probation Office should promptly report all hours of community service performed by each probationer, regularly throughout the probation term, to the Clerk-Magistrate’s Office for recording in MassCourts so that both offices can readily determine the status of probationers’ accounts.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Probation Office in the East Brookfield District Court has a centralized method of effectively tracking all hours of community service assigned, performed and owed."
Auditor: "However, the court lacks an efficient means to do this, because the spreadsheet referred to in EBDC’s response does not specify the balance owed for each type of fee or the dates when community service was performed."