Disabled Persons Protection Commission
July 9, 2015 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗
source
“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Disabled Persons Protection Commission, the Massachusetts agency that investigates and helps address abuse of adults with disabilities.
“The Disabled Persons Protection Commission (DPPC) was created under Chapter 19C of the Massachusetts General Laws and is responsible for the investigation and remediation of abuse of people with disabilities.”
The State Auditor reviewed whether DPPC was doing investigations on time and following the rules that apply to those investigations.
“We reviewed these activities to evaluate DPPC’s ability to perform its investigative functions in a timely manner and in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.”
Late investigations can slow down protective action for abuse victims, and missing documentation makes it harder to know whether DPPC followed required steps.
“Delayed investigations could prevent DPPC from promptly implementing remedial action plans to protect abuse victims, and the lack of documented reasons may prevent it from demonstrating its attempts at compliance and from identifying recurring causes for delays.”
For Massachusetts residents, this matters because DPPC handles abuse reports involving adults with disabilities, including people who may be in state care or private settings.
“DPPC’s website also states that its jurisdiction includes adults with disabilities between the ages of 18 and 59 who are “in state care or in a private setting and who suffer serious physical and/or emotional injury through the act and/or omission of their caregivers.””
The audit concluded that DPPC did not fully meet investigative standards and did not always investigate complaints within required timelines.
“Did DPPC investigate all abuse complaints in a timely manner in accordance with established laws, rules, and regulations?”
The auditor recommended that DPPC improve its procedures, keep documentation when deadlines are missed, and work with partner agencies to finish investigations on time.
“DPPC should establish and implement the necessary policies, procedures, and related internal controls to ensure that when required filing deadlines are not met, evidence of the reasons for the delay is documented and retained in case files.”
The key public concern is whether reports of abuse against people with disabilities are handled quickly enough to prevent further harm.
“Timely completion of investigations is critical so that DPPC can intervene quickly if abuse is still occurring.”
An Initial Response is the early part of an abuse investigation, and an Investigation Report is the fuller report that follows.
“Each report is composed of two distinct parts: the Initial Response and the Investigation Report.”
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Did DPPC properly adhere to established investigative standards?
- Did not comply Did DPPC investigate all abuse complaints in a timely manner in accordance with established laws, rules, and regulations?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Without documentation, there is inadequate assurance that alleged abusers knew and understood their rights and legal obligations during investigations.
Standard: 118 Code of Massachusetts Regulations 5.02 ( 118 Code of Massachusetts Regulations 5.02 )
2 recommendations
- DPPC should retain signed Rights of Abuser Forms in alleged abuse victims' case files as evidence of compliance with 118 CMR 5.02.
- DPPC should work to amend its regulations to require all alleged abusers to read and sign the form.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DPPC respectfully disagrees with the Audit’s characterization of the purpose and importance of the M.G.L. c. 19C Interview Advisory Form (“Advisory Form”)."
Auditor: "We acknowledge that DPPC regulations do not specifically require that alleged abusers sign a Rights of Abuser form acknowledging that they have been advised of their rights."
Why it matters: Delayed investigations could delay remedial action plans to protect abuse victims, and missing documentation makes it harder to justify extensions or identify recurring causes of delay.
Standard: 118 Code of Massachusetts Regulations 5.02
2 recommendations
- DPPC should continue to work with DDS, DMH, and MRC to complete emergency investigations within 24 hours, Initial Responses within 10 days, and Investigation Reports within 30 days.
- DPPC should establish and implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to ensure reasons for missed filing deadlines are documented and retained in case files.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Regarding Finding Two, that the DPPC does not always meet its required deadlines to complete investigations and does not always document the reason for delays, the DPPC accepts and supports this finding."
Auditor: "We concur with DPPC’s position that the safety of alleged victims should be its highest priority."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Disabled Persons Protection Commission .
- Audit of the Disabled Persons Protection Commission (June 30, 2025)Authority / Commission · June 30, 2025
- Audit of the Disabled Persons Protection Commission (DPPC)Authority / Commission · June 16, 2021
- Disabled Persons Protection CommissionAuthority / Commission · July 9, 2015