Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Department of the State Police's Use of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds

September 30, 2011 · Department of the State Police · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published September 30, 2011 Audit covers May 1, 2009 – November 30, 2010 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found the State Police mostly followed the rules for federal stimulus money, but needed better written risk planning for those grants.
source
“Based on our review we have concluded that, except for the issue addressed in the Audit Results section of this report, for the period May 1, 2009 through November 30, 2010, DSP maintained adequate management controls and complied with applicable laws, rules, and regulations for the areas tested.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of how the Massachusetts State Police used federal Recovery Act grant money from May 2009 through November 2010.

“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the Massachusetts General Laws, we have conducted an audit of certain activities of DSP for the period May 1, 2009 through November 30, 2010.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked what federal stimulus money the State Police received, how it was spent, whether rules were followed, and whether jobs funded by the money were reported.

“The objectives of our audit were to obtain and review a listing of the type and amount of all ARRA funds the DSP has applied for, plans to receive, or has received and expended; to review and evaluate DSP’s internal controls over ARRA expenditures and determine whether ARRA funds are being expended for the intended purposes and in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; to determine whether the DSP is complying with ARRA accounting and reporting requirements as well as other grant requirements; and to ensure that DSP has identified and reported the number of jobs created/retained with ARRA funds.”
Why it matters

Good risk planning helps prevent public money from being mishandled or spent without enough safeguards.

“Without the additional risk assessments, DSP and the Commonwealth cannot be assured that all potential risks have been considered and controls to minimize potential risks have been fully developed and implemented.”
What's in it for me?

The money supported things residents may notice indirectly, including fuel for police vehicles, patrol boats, and work related to internet crimes against children.

“State Fiscal Stabilization Funds were utilized to pay for vehicle fuel costs.”
The bottom line

The main problem was not misuse of funds; it was that the State Police had not fully documented the specific risks tied to managing ARRA money.

“Although DSP has updated this ICP to include additional control and monitoring activities for ARRA as required by the OSC, it has not fully identified and documented the specific risks associated with managing ARRA funds.”
What happens next

The auditors told the State Police to update its internal control plan with ARRA-related risk assessments and controls.

“We recommend that DSP update its ICP to include risk assessments associated with ARRA grants and ensure that proper controls are in place to eliminate or reduce those identified risks.”
Why it's significant

The State Police received more than $5.3 million in federal stimulus grants, so even a documentation issue mattered because the amount of public money was substantial.

“During our audit period, DSP was awarded four separate grants through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) totaling $5,368,142.”
Jargon, unpacked

A risk assessment means looking for things that could keep an agency from meeting its goals, then planning controls to reduce those risks.

“One of the components in developing an ICP is a risk assessment, which is a process to identify and analyze factors that may affect the achievement of a goal.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

DSP did not document ARRA-specific risk assessments in its Internal Control Plan.
internal controlsgrants managementrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: DSP and the Commonwealth could not be assured that all potential ARRA risks had been considered or that controls to minimize those risks had been fully developed and implemented.

Standard: Office of the State Comptroller guidelines require each department to update its Internal Control Plan and ARRA Internal Control Guidance requires each component of the internal control system to include coverage of ARRA funds. ( Chapter 11, Section 12, of the Massachusetts General Laws; Office of the State Comptroller’s Guidelines issued in September of 2007; ARRA Internal Control Guidance )

1 recommendation
  • DSP should update its Internal Control Plan to include ARRA grant risk assessments and ensure controls are in place to eliminate or reduce identified risks.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "I am pleased to report that the single audit finding concerning the Agency’s failure to update its Internal Control Plan’s risk assessment by including coverage of ARRA funds has been reconciled."