Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Department of Public Health's Licensing and Monitoring of the Newcare Health Corporation (Newcare)

NOVEMBER 16, 2000 · Department of Public Health · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published NOVEMBER 16, 2000 Audit covers not stated – not stated Under A. Joseph DeNucci · 1987–2011

In plain English
The auditor found that the Department of Public Health did not adequately monitor a $500,000 reserve account NewCare was required to keep while running four Massachusetts nursing homes.
source
“Our audit revealed that the Department of Public Health (DPH) may not have taken all of the measures possible to ensure that the NewCare Health Corporation (NewCare) complied with all the terms and conditions of its provisional licensure agreement.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of how Massachusetts DPH licensed and monitored NewCare’s operation of four long-term care facilities in western Massachusetts.

“The scope of our audit was to examine certain aspects of DPH’s licensing and monitoring of NewCare.”
Why was it audited?

The audit looked at DPH’s legal duties, how it approved NewCare’s conditional license, and whether DPH’s licensing administration could be improved.

“Our specific audit objectives were to: (1) determine DPH’s responsibilities pertaining to the licensure and monitoring of LTCFs; (2) assess DPH’s process in granting a conditional license to NewCare, Inc.; and (3) determine whether DPH’s administrative activities relative to its licensure of LTCFs could be improved.”
Why it matters

The reserve account was supposed to help keep the nursing homes operating, but the full amount was withdrawn without DPH knowing or approving it.

“As a result, two days after DPH was notified by NewCare’s attorney that the escrow account was established and funded, NewCare withdrew the entire $500,000 without DPH’s knowledge or consent and did not replenish the balance, jeopardizing DPH’s ability to ensure the continued operation of the four nursing homes being managed by NewCare.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, families, workers, and taxpayers, the issue is whether the state had enough safeguards when a financially concerning company was allowed to run nursing homes.

“This condition was developed to ensure that sufficient funds would be available to operate the facilities being managed by NewCare in Massachusetts.”
The bottom line

The auditor concluded DPH should have done more to protect the public interest, especially because DPH already had serious concerns about NewCare.

“In our opinion, given the serious concerns DPH had relative to NewCare, it would have been more prudent of DPH to be more proactive in its administration of this matter.”
What happens next

The report recommended stronger controls, better legal review of agreements, and possible legislation giving DPH control of escrow funds for provisional licenses.

“In addition, DPH should work with the Legislature to draft legislation that would require DPH to hold and control any escrow for any entity granted a provisional license.”
Why it's significant

The case exposed a gap in state oversight: DPH relied on agreements and outside parties, but did not have direct control or enough monitoring to know the reserve fund was gone.

“Such measures would have helped to ensure that the interests of DPH, its clients, and the Commonwealth are adequately protected.”
Jargon, unpacked

A long-term care facility means a place like a nursing home; a conditional or probationary license means DPH allowed NewCare to operate only if it met special conditions; an escrow account means money set aside for a specific purpose.

“The Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Division of Health Care Quality (DPH), is mandated to license and monitor long-term care facilities (LTCF), including nursing homes, in the Commonwealth.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

DPH did not adequately monitor NewCare’s escrow account required by its conditional license.
licensing/inspectionsinternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: NewCare withdrew the escrow funds without DPH’s knowledge or consent, which jeopardized DPH’s ability to ensure continued operation of four nursing homes.

Standard: Conditional Suitability Agreement Condition 4 required NewCare to establish, maintain, and replenish a $500,000 escrow account and notify DPH if it fell below $150,000. ( Chapter 111, Section 71, of the General Laws; 105 Code of Massachusetts Regulations )

3 recommendations
  • DPH should establish adequate controls to monitor and assess compliance with conditional licenses.agency: partially agreed
  • DPH legal counsel should review each agreement to ensure it protects DPH and the Commonwealth and make DPH a party when necessary.
  • DPH should work with the Legislature on legislation requiring DPH to hold and control escrow funds for entities granted provisional licenses.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "It is DPH’s position that we took reasonable measures to protect our interests given our assumption that the Regional Manager would act in a responsible and professional manner and that NewCare’s attorneys would act in accordance with the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct…."
Auditor: "Our report clearly identifies the measures taken by DPH to protect its interests relative to this issue."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Public Health .

See this entity's page with all 4 audits →