Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project - Selected Aspects of Wrap-up Insurance Program

JUNE 14, 2000 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published JUNE 14, 2000 Audit covers November 1, 1992 – October 31, 1999 Under A. Joseph DeNucci · 1987–2011

In plain English
The Big Dig insurance program had more money set aside than needed for some workers' compensation premiums, and the project planned to use $172 million of those reserves instead of borrowing more, potentially saving Massachusetts about $64 million.
source
“By using the $100 million and $72 million, or a total of $172 million, from the trust to offset workers’ compensation premiums due for policy years 1999/00 through 2005, related state borrowing costs of an estimated $64 million could be saved.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of the Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project's wrap-up insurance program, especially workers' compensation and general liability insurance, covering November 1, 1992 through October 31, 1999.

“This interim report deals with MTA’s wrap-up insurance program and, in particular, certain aspects of its workers’ compensation and general liability coverage.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors looked at whether the project was managing key parts of its insurance program effectively, including premium payments, reserves, and insurance risks.

“The objective of our review, which covered the period November 1, 1992 to October 31, 1999, was to determine the effectiveness of certain aspects of the management of the workers’ compensation and general liability portions of the wrap-up insurance program.”
Why it matters

The project was already facing major cost growth, so unused insurance money and possible uninsured risks mattered to taxpayers, bondholders, and state financial reporting.

“The significant amount of this potential risk exposure and its possible concern to bondholders and other interested readers of the Commonwealth’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report require us to furnish this information to the cognizant audit group responsible for conducting the state’s annual financial audit under the Single Audit Act of the United States.”
What's in it for me?

For an ordinary Massachusetts resident, the practical point is that using already available insurance reserves could reduce borrowing costs and leave less of the project's cost burden to the public.

“This would further reduce state borrowing costs by another $27 million.”
The bottom line

The auditors said the project accepted the recommendation to use excess insurance reserves, but they also warned that the project still had large possible uninsured or underinsured risks to disclose and manage.

“The actions planned by the project are consistent with the recommendation in our September 1998 report to use excess insurance reserve funds for current project purposes.”
What happens next

The auditors wanted the project to actually follow through on using the $172 million and to make sure state finance officials knew about the potential insurance risks so disclosures could be handled properly.

“Because CA/T has not always used the amount of excess premium payments it has planned to use to offset future premium payments, we reiterate our recommendation that CA/T adhere to its present plan and use the $172 million to offset workers’ compensation premiums.”
Why it's significant

This report is significant because it identified a way to use existing reserve funds for current project costs while also flagging possible insurance exposure ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.

“The study reported that the estimated range of potential risk, excluding workers’ compensation and general liability exposures, was from a low of $513 million to a high of $3.7 billion.”
Jargon, unpacked

A 'wrap-up' insurance program means the project bought one broad insurance package for contractors instead of having each contractor buy separate coverage.

“While design and construction contractors generally purchase their own insurance coverage and recover costs through their contracts, the CA/T Project purchased "wrap-up" insurance that provides contractors working at the CA/T Project with coverage for a variety of risks.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

CA/T had excess insurance reserve funds that should be used to offset workers’ compensation premiums.
internal controlscash handling

Why it matters: Using the excess reserve funds would reduce state borrowing costs by an estimated $64 million.

Standard: Prior Office of the State Auditor recommendation to use excess insurance premiums for current project needs. ( Existing regulations )

1 recommendation
  • CA/T should use $172 million from the trust to offset workers’ compensation premiums.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: ". . . the Project plans to cease making new Worker’s Compensation premium payments into the Trust for the policy year’s 99/00 and 00/01, for an estimated pay-in reduction of $100 million."
Auditor: "In connection with the first point, the actions planned by the Project are consistent with our past and current report recommendations relative to this matter."
CA/T faced potentially uninsured or underinsured insurance risks.
internal controlsreporting timeliness

Why it matters: The risk exposure could concern bondholders and readers of the Commonwealth’s financial statements and may require disclosure.

Standard: Disclosure principles required of independent auditors and financial review under the Single Audit Act of the United States. ( Single Audit Act of the United States )

Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Regarding the notification of appropriate state agencies of the Project’s recently identified uninsured and underinsured project insurance risk, the acting Project Director advised us that he agrees with our recommendation."
Auditor: "We commend the Project’s positive acceptance of the third point and will monitor the implementation of our recommendation to notify appropriate state agencies of the unmet financial insurance risk facing the Project."

Verified dollar findings

Projected / estimated $4,277,000,000 not in headline

Estimated or sample-projected amounts - shown separately because they are not a hard-identified dollar figure.

$64 million - estimated state borrowing cost savings
$513 million - low estimate of potential risk
$3.7 billion - high estimate of potential risk
Other identified $172,000,000 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$172 million - excess insurance reserve funds to offset premiums

Prior findings revisited

Fixed
"This use of the excess premiums is consistent with our recommendation and could reduce related state borrowing costs by approximately $37 million."