Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund

June 13, 2017 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published June 13, 2017 Audit covers July 1, 2012 – June 30, 2015 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the fund helped families with major child medical costs, but it had serious problems: slow application processing, missing paperwork, no full sliding fee scale, missed federal reimbursement money, missing annual reports, and payments that did not always follow its own rules.
source
“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund, covering July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015.

“I am pleased to provide this performance audit of the Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund.”
Why was it audited?

The Auditor reviewed whether the fund helped families that applied, paid only eligible people for eligible medical costs, and tried to get federal matching money when allowed.

“The objective of this audit was to determine whether CICRF met the needs of families that applied for financial assistance, whether it disbursed funds only to eligible applicants and only for qualified medical expenses, and whether it sought federal matching funds (also called federal financial participation) in accordance with state regulations for all eligible medical expenses.”
Why it matters

The fund is meant to reduce crushing medical costs for Massachusetts families with children who have catastrophic illnesses, so delays or weak controls can directly affect families under financial stress.

“CICRF’s mission is to provide financial assistance to families with non-covered medical expenses related to their children’s catastrophic illnesses.”
What's in it for me?

If you are a Massachusetts resident with a child facing very high uncovered medical costs, this program may reimburse some costs, but the audit says the process was often slow and needed better oversight.

“CICRF reimburses families for medical expenses that health insurers do not cover or for which they have denied payment.”
What happens next

The Auditor recommended that the fund create a proper sliding fee scale, reduce delays, seek federal matching funds, collect required documentation, file annual reports, and update policies if it changes how eligibility periods work.

“CICRF should perform a staffing and workflow analysis to establish strategies to mitigate the delays it is experiencing and should work toward creating attainable, time-based goals for processing applications to reduce the time that applications remain unassigned and idle.”
Why it's significant

The audit found problems involving millions of dollars in reimbursements, long average wait times, and missed federal money, meaning the issues were not just paperwork concerns.

“In total, CICRF reimbursed families $2,241,029 without using a sliding fee scale during the audit period.”
Jargon, unpacked

CICRF is the Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund. DPH is the Department of Public Health. A sliding fee scale means payment amounts should account for a family’s ability to pay, including income, family size, assets, and medical expenses. Federal matching funds are federal Medicaid-related reimbursements the state may be able to claim for eligible medical costs.

“Establish the amount of reimbursement for the medical expenses of each child using a sliding fee scale based on a family's ability to pay for medical expenses, which takes into account family size, family income and assets and family medical expenses.”

4 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor found

CICRF did not use a sliding fee scale for $2.2 million in reimbursements.
internal controls

Why it matters: There was inadequate assurance that all reimbursement amounts were accurate.

Standard: Section 5(d) of Chapter 111K of the Massachusetts General Laws requires CICRF to establish reimbursement amounts using a sliding fee scale based on family ability to pay. ( Section 5(d) of Chapter 111K of the Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • CICRF should develop a sliding fee scale, applicable to all expense categories, that gives consideration to family income, size, and assets.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "CICRF acknowledges that it did not use a sliding fee scale for all reimbursements."
CICRF did not begin processing financial-assistance applications in a timely manner.
reporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: Delays may have caused financial hardship and may have prevented CICRF from using available funds to help more families.

1 recommendation
  • CICRF should perform a staffing and workflow analysis to establish strategies to mitigate delays and create attainable, time-based goals for processing applications.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "CICRF staff agrees that the backlog in applications is of great concern."
Auditor: "Thus, had CICRF been more efficient in processing applications, it could have processed more payments and used more of the $4.4 million in funding available to it during this time."
CICRF did not pursue federal matching funds for $60,643 of qualified medical services.
grants managementinternal controls

Why it matters: The Commonwealth lost an opportunity to receive federal matching funds.

Standard: Section 10 of Chapter 111K of the General Laws requires DPH, in consultation with the Division of Medical Assistance, to maximize and coordinate federal financial participation. ( Section 10 of Chapter 111K of the General Laws; Title XIX of the Social Security Act )

1 recommendation
  • DPH should review all CICRF reimbursements to determine whether any qualify for federal matching funds and coordinate with DMA to seek federal matching funds for all eligible expenditures.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DPH and CICRF will continue to coordinate with MassHealth going forward to pursue federal matching funds of qualified medical services moving forward."
CICRF reimbursed families without obtaining required documentation.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsfraud/theft

Why it matters: CICRF may have improperly reimbursed families that were not eligible to receive benefits.

Standard: CICRF’s procedure manual requires each case file to contain a physician’s letter and, if applicable, a certificate of vehicle registration. ( CICRF procedure manual, Required Documentation for All Applicants section )

2 recommendations
  • CICRF should amend its policy to require supporting documentation, including physician letters and vehicle certificates of registration.agency: partially agreed
  • CICRF should ensure required information is obtained, evaluated, and retained before reimbursements are provided.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "CICRF is extremely committed to obtaining all required documentation prior to approving any reimbursements to a family."
Auditor: "CICRF’s procedures regarding this activity establish the minimum documentation that is necessary to substantiate that an applicant meets all of the program’s eligibility requirements and is entitled to the requested reimbursements; therefore, it is essential that CICRF ensure that its staff consistently follows the procedures."
CICRF did not file required annual reports.
reporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: The Governor and legislative committees lacked information needed to monitor CICRF’s activities.

Standard: Section 11 of Chapter 111K of the General Laws requires CICRF to file annual financial and performance reports. ( Section 11 of Chapter 111K of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • CICRF should file its required annual report.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "CICRF concurs that annual reports were not filed for FY11, FY12 and FY13."
CICRF reimbursed expenses beyond established eligibility periods without following its policies.
eligibility determinationinternal controls

Why it matters: CICRF may not have ensured applicants met eligibility requirements and may have delayed processing of backlogged applications.

Standard: CICRF’s Eligibility Determination Policy requires recipients to reapply after their eligibility period ends to request additional funding. ( CICRF Eligibility Determination Policy )

1 recommendation
  • If CICRF wants to create more than one eligibility period per application, it should amend its policies, define when and how long eligibility periods may be extended, and ensure continued eligibility before additional reimbursements.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "CICRF disagrees with the finding that it provided reimbursement without following its established policies."
Auditor: "We do not agree that CICRF followed its policies for establishing eligibility periods and determining income; the case described in the finding indicates otherwise."

Verified dollar findings

Other identified $18,800 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$18,800 - reimbursements without required information

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →