Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Cape Ann Transportation Authority

December 15, 2011 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗ · official site ↗

Published December 15, 2011 Audit covers March 31, 2009 – April 20, 2011 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that Cape Ann Transportation Authority generally handled its federal stimulus money properly, but it was late in spending one payment and missed or submitted inaccurate required reports.
source
“Based on our review, we have concluded that, except for the matters discussed in the Audit Results section of this report, during the period March 31, 2009 through April 20, 2011, CATA maintained adequate management controls and complied with applicable laws, rules, and regulations for the areas tested.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor report on how Cape Ann Transportation Authority used federal Recovery Act transportation money between March 31, 2009 and April 20, 2011.

“In accordance with Chapter 11, Section 12, of the General Laws, we have conducted an audit of CATA’s use of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds for the period March 31, 2009 through April 20, 2011.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether CATA had proper controls over the federal money, monitored it, and spent it for the purposes allowed by the grants.

“The objectives of our audit were to review CATA’s controls over and monitoring of ARRA funds received and expended.”
Why it matters

The money came from federal stimulus funds and totaled $743,765, so the public needed assurance that it was tracked, reported, and used correctly.

“During the audit period, CATA received and expended ARRA funds totaling $743,765.”
What's in it for me?

For riders and taxpayers, the money supported local bus service by paying for two replacement buses and operating assistance.

“These grants were authorized to be used for the purchase of two replacement 30-foot buses and operating assistance.”
The bottom line

CATA spent all of the federal funds, but the audit found two main problems: one payment sat too long before being spent, and required Recovery Act reports were missing, late, or inaccurate.

“As of April 20, 2011, CATA received and expended all its ARRA funds as detailed in the table below.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that CATA tighten its controls so future federal funds are spent promptly and reports are filed on time with complete and accurate information.

“At a minimum, these controls should ensure that reports are filed on time and that data quality and completeness are validated before submission.”
Why it's significant

The reporting problems mattered because serious or repeated failures could put federal funding at risk.

“This action can result in the termination of Federal funding.”
Jargon, unpacked

A cash drawdown means CATA requested federal money from the government; federal rules said CATA should spend that money within three days instead of holding it.

“Specifically, we determined that CATA submitted and received a request for payment (cash drawdown) totaling $67,615 that was held for six days before the funds were disbursed.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

CATA held a federal cash drawdown longer than allowed before disbursing it.
cash handlinginternal controlsgrants management

Why it matters: The FTA could revoke or temporarily suspend CATA’s access to the ECHO-Web system, and excess funds may need to be returned with interest.

Standard: Department of Treasury regulations, 31 Code of Federal Regulations Part 205, and FTA ECHO-Web cash management procedures requiring disbursement within three calendar days. ( 31 Code of Federal Regulations Part 205 )

2 recommendations
  • CATA should reexamine its internal controls so federal assistance funds are disbursed within three calendar days.agency: agreed
  • CATA should contact the FTA about excess interest earned on the $67,615 and how to return it.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In response to this issue, CATA commented that they agreed with the finding and the recommendation as outlined in the report."
CATA did not file required ARRA reports on time, and some reports were inaccurate.
reporting timelinessgrants managementinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: Late, missing, or inaccurate reports put CATA at risk of FTA enforcement action, including termination of federal funding.

Standard: Sections 1201(c) and 1512 of the Recovery Act. ( Section 1201(c) of the Recovery Act; Section 1512 of the Recovery Act )

2 recommendations
  • CATA should strengthen internal controls to ensure current and future federal reporting requirements are met.agency: agreed
  • CATA should ensure reports are filed on time and data quality and completeness are validated before submission.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In response to this issue, CATA commented that they agreed with the finding and the recommendation as outlined in the report."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Cape Ann Transportation Authority .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →