Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Barry L. Price Rehabilitation Center, Inc. Adminstration of Limited Unit Rate Service Agreements

August 6, 2013 · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published August 6, 2013 Audit covers July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2011 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Auditors questioned about $505,378 in payments to Barry L. Price Rehabilitation Center because approvals were often late, records were weak, and some money may have been used outside the intended rules.
source
“We found problems with $505,378 of BLP’s accounts-payable-period LUSA transactions, including inadequate documentation to substantiate that LUSA services were properly authorized, inadequate documentation to support LUSA billings, and LUSA contract funding not being used for its intended purposes, as follows:”
Read the plain-English breakdown
Why was it audited?

The State Auditor reviewed these payments to check accountability, transparency, and whether human-service contract money was being used properly.

“The overall audit of DDS was conducted as part of OSA’s ongoing efforts to audit human-service contracting activity by state agencies and to promote accountability, transparency, and cost effectiveness in state contracting.”
Why it matters

The report says DDS was using these flexible contracts in ways that could create unnecessary or excessive payments to contractors.

“Instead DDS Regional and Area Office staff have used LUSA contracts to provide additional year-end funding to some DDS human-service contractors for various purposes, many of which are not consistent with the intended use of these funds and resulted in unnecessary and excessive compensation to contractors.”
What's in it for me?

For an ordinary citizen, this matters because public money should have clear approvals and records showing services were actually provided and not paid for twice.

“The lack of adequate documentation violated provisions of the Commonwealth Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services, and as a result, there was insufficient evidence to show that these LUSA payments had been properly authorized and accounted for; that they were not duplicative or excessive; and that the contractor had actually provided the LUSA services billed.”
The bottom line

The auditors did not say BLP failed to provide services, but they found the records were not good enough to prove the payments were proper.

“No transactions were found to be properly authorized and documented.”
What happens next

The report says oversight agencies should review the issues, and BLP should strengthen controls so future services are properly done, documented, billed, and accounted for.

“In accordance with the recommendations of the overall report and the testing results specific to BLP, BLP should implement appropriate control measures to ensure that all LUSA services are performed, documented, billed, and accounted for in compliance with applicable requirements.”
Jargon, unpacked

LUSAs are flexible DDS contracts meant for short-term, as-needed services for clients not already covered by another contract.

“LUSAs are a form of a master contract agreement that can be used by DDS to purchase services from a preapproved contractor on an intermittent, limited-time basis for clients who are not already covered through an existing contract.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Barry L. Price Rehabilitation Center had questionable use of $505,378 in LUSA funds.
procurement/contractsrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: There was insufficient assurance that payments were properly authorized, not duplicative or excessive, and supported by actual service delivery.

Standard: DDS Purchase of Service Manual; Commonwealth Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services; OSD Procurement Policies and Procedures ( Chapter 11, Section 12, of the Massachusetts General Laws; Section 7 of the Commonwealth Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services; OSD Procurement Policies and Procedures, “How to Draft a Request for Response” )

1 recommendation
  • BLP should implement appropriate control measures to ensure that all LUSA services are performed, documented, billed, and accounted for in compliance with applicable requirements.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Further, to the extent that the Audit Report suggests that the Price Center may have misused LUSA funds, or failed to deliver services to clients paid for by those funds, I strenuously disagree."
Auditor: "However, the information in this report is accurate with regard to specific problems with BLP’s administration of these funds and, more specifically, its lack of documentation of the funds’ use."

Verified dollar findings

Other identified $505,378 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$505,378 - questioned funding