Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department

April 11, 2019 · Suffolk County Sheriff's Department · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published April 11, 2019 Audit covers July 1, 2015 – December 31, 2017 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found two main problems: some payroll and overtime was not properly approved, and required inmate cost reports were filed late.
source
“SCSD did not properly approve $25,599 in payroll expenses, including $17,734 in overtime payments.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department covering July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors reviewed spending, purchasing and contracts, revenue handling, and staff overtime to see whether the department followed rules and procedures.

“In this performance audit, we reviewed SCSD’s administrative expenditures, procurement of goods and services, and administration of staff overtime.”
Why it matters

If payroll approvals and required reports are missing or late, officials may not have enough proof that money was spent properly or enough information to oversee the department.

“As a result, these governmental entities may not have had all the information they needed to properly inform their consideration of any policy, operational, or financial issues regarding SCSD’s operations.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, this audit is about whether a public agency that runs jails and receives state funding is keeping proper records and controls over taxpayer-funded payroll and reporting.

“SCSD’s state budget appropriation was $104,492,346 in fiscal year 2016, $103,447,423 in fiscal year 2017, and $105,516,371 in fiscal year 2018 (July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017).”
The bottom line

The auditor said the department needed stronger checks over payroll approval and needed to file required inmate cost reports on time.

“SCSD should establish monitoring controls to ensure that these procedures are followed.”
What happens next

The department said it changed its payroll approval process and would keep working with state agencies to meet reporting requirements.

“Based on the recommendation of the Auditors, SCSD immediately modified the payroll approval process by requiring the shift commanders to sign, and the ASO to initial, the printed copies of the Time and Attendance Roster Forms that are filed in the daily folders, thus establishing clear evidence of their review and approval of overtime and time-off use.”
Why it's significant

The findings were limited, but important: the audit did not find problems with certain administrative expenses, yet it did find failures in overtime approval and required reporting.

“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer; the conclusion we reached regarding each objective; and, if applicable, where each objective is discussed in the audit findings.”
Jargon, unpacked

The inmate total cost analysis report is a required report showing what it costs to care for inmates at each facility and department.

“Inmate total cost analysis reports are compiled by each sheriff’s department in conjunction with the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association and detail the total costs for the care and custody of inmates for each facility and department.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

SCSD did not properly approve payroll expenses and overtime payments.
payroll/timeinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: SCSD management cannot be certain that all compensation provided to the correction officers for the sampled days was appropriate.

Standard: SCSD’s internal control plan required shift commanders to authorize time and attendance information and required the assistant superintendent of operations, or a designee, to review daily roster forms for accuracy, authorization, and necessity of overtime and time-off use. ( Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws; SCSD internal control plan, Payroll Processing Procedures sections 3.12, 3.12.1, and 3.13 )

3 recommendations
  • SCSD should take the measures necessary to ensure that all Time and Attendance Roster Forms are properly reviewed and approved.agency: already implemented
  • SCSD should consider amending its current procedures to require that the assistant superintendent of operations or their designee who reviews the daily Time and Attendance Roster Forms also sign off on the forms to acknowledge that this review has been performed.agency: already implemented
  • SCSD should establish monitoring controls to ensure that these procedures are followed.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "SCSD disputes the statement by the Office of the State Auditor that, “SCSD management cannot be certain that all the compensation provided to these [correction] officers was appropriate.”"
Auditor: "Although SCSD asserts in its response that it follows the guidance in its ICP, we found that this was not always the case."
SCSD did not submit required inmate total cost analysis reports.
reporting timelinessgrants managementinternal controls

Why it matters: Government agencies and legislative committees may not have had all the information needed to consider policy, operational, or financial issues regarding SCSD’s operations.

Standard: Line Item 8910-7110 in the Commonwealth’s fiscal year 2018 budget summary required each sheriff’s office to report fiscal year 2017 total costs per inmate by facility and department by December 1, 2017, and submit the report to specified agencies and committees. ( Line Item 8910-7110 in the Commonwealth’s fiscal year 2018 budget summary )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should work with MSA and EOAF to obtain the information it needs to make sure it files its annual cost reports within the prescribed timelines.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "It should be noted that the SCSD made many efforts to complete and submit the inmate cost reports on time, however due to the circumstance of reliance upon another state agency to complete critical tasks as stated in the legislation, SCSD was unfortunately not able to meet the deadlines."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Suffolk County Sheriff's Department .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →