Audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department
April 11, 2019 · Suffolk County Sheriff's Department · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“SCSD did not properly approve $25,599 in payroll expenses, including $17,734 in overtime payments.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department covering July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.
“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.”
Auditors reviewed spending, purchasing and contracts, revenue handling, and staff overtime to see whether the department followed rules and procedures.
“In this performance audit, we reviewed SCSD’s administrative expenditures, procurement of goods and services, and administration of staff overtime.”
If payroll approvals and required reports are missing or late, officials may not have enough proof that money was spent properly or enough information to oversee the department.
“As a result, these governmental entities may not have had all the information they needed to properly inform their consideration of any policy, operational, or financial issues regarding SCSD’s operations.”
For residents, this audit is about whether a public agency that runs jails and receives state funding is keeping proper records and controls over taxpayer-funded payroll and reporting.
“SCSD’s state budget appropriation was $104,492,346 in fiscal year 2016, $103,447,423 in fiscal year 2017, and $105,516,371 in fiscal year 2018 (July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017).”
The auditor said the department needed stronger checks over payroll approval and needed to file required inmate cost reports on time.
“SCSD should establish monitoring controls to ensure that these procedures are followed.”
The department said it changed its payroll approval process and would keep working with state agencies to meet reporting requirements.
“Based on the recommendation of the Auditors, SCSD immediately modified the payroll approval process by requiring the shift commanders to sign, and the ASO to initial, the printed copies of the Time and Attendance Roster Forms that are filed in the daily folders, thus establishing clear evidence of their review and approval of overtime and time-off use.”
The findings were limited, but important: the audit did not find problems with certain administrative expenses, yet it did find failures in overtime approval and required reporting.
“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer; the conclusion we reached regarding each objective; and, if applicable, where each objective is discussed in the audit findings.”
The inmate total cost analysis report is a required report showing what it costs to care for inmates at each facility and department.
“Inmate total cost analysis reports are compiled by each sheriff’s department in conjunction with the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association and detail the total costs for the care and custody of inmates for each facility and department.”
3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Complied Were certain administrative expenses executed in accordance with SCSD’s policies and procedures, and did they directly support SCSD’s mission?
- Did not comply Did SCSD properly administer its revenue and its contracting process for goods and services in accordance with its internal control policies and procedures, the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association’s (MSA’s) budgetary requirements, and any contractual agreements?
- Did not comply Did SCSD properly administer overtime for its employees who received the most overtime, in accordance with its policies and procedures?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: SCSD management cannot be certain that all compensation provided to the correction officers for the sampled days was appropriate.
Standard: SCSD’s internal control plan required shift commanders to authorize time and attendance information and required the assistant superintendent of operations, or a designee, to review daily roster forms for accuracy, authorization, and necessity of overtime and time-off use. ( Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws; SCSD internal control plan, Payroll Processing Procedures sections 3.12, 3.12.1, and 3.13 )
3 recommendations
- SCSD should take the measures necessary to ensure that all Time and Attendance Roster Forms are properly reviewed and approved.agency: already implemented
- SCSD should consider amending its current procedures to require that the assistant superintendent of operations or their designee who reviews the daily Time and Attendance Roster Forms also sign off on the forms to acknowledge that this review has been performed.agency: already implemented
- SCSD should establish monitoring controls to ensure that these procedures are followed.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "SCSD disputes the statement by the Office of the State Auditor that, “SCSD management cannot be certain that all the compensation provided to these [correction] officers was appropriate.”"
Auditor: "Although SCSD asserts in its response that it follows the guidance in its ICP, we found that this was not always the case."
Why it matters: Government agencies and legislative committees may not have had all the information needed to consider policy, operational, or financial issues regarding SCSD’s operations.
Standard: Line Item 8910-7110 in the Commonwealth’s fiscal year 2018 budget summary required each sheriff’s office to report fiscal year 2017 total costs per inmate by facility and department by December 1, 2017, and submit the report to specified agencies and committees. ( Line Item 8910-7110 in the Commonwealth’s fiscal year 2018 budget summary )
1 recommendation
- SCSD should work with MSA and EOAF to obtain the information it needs to make sure it files its annual cost reports within the prescribed timelines.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "It should be noted that the SCSD made many efforts to complete and submit the inmate cost reports on time, however due to the circumstance of reliance upon another state agency to complete critical tasks as stated in the legislation, SCSD was unfortunately not able to meet the deadlines."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Suffolk County Sheriff's Department .
- Audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department - A Review of Healthcare and Inmate DeathsSheriff · December 7, 2022
- Audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department (December 24, 2025)Sheriff · December 24, 2025