Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department (December 24, 2025)

December 24, 2025 · Suffolk County Sheriff's Department · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published December 24, 2025 Audit covers July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2024 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found repeated gaps in how the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department documented and managed inmate programs, orientations, education, treatment consent forms, and healthcare vendor oversight.
source
“Below is a summary of our findings, the results of those findings, and our recommendations, with hyperlinks to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of selected Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department activities from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of certain activities of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department (SCSD) for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the department followed rules and its own policies for inmate services, education, substance use treatment, orientation, counseling, crisis help, and medical care requests.

“The purpose of our audit was to determine the following:”
Why it matters

These programs and controls matter because they affect whether incarcerated people know their rights, get appropriate services, receive medical attention on time, and are better prepared to return to the community.

“If SCSD does not annually review the needs of its sentenced inmates in relation to the social service programs it offers, SCSD has a higher risk that it may not provide its sentenced inmates with programs essential to their needs in order to set them up for successful reentry.”
What's in it for me?

For the public, this matters because the department’s mission includes public safety, lawful custody, and rehabilitation aimed at reducing repeat offending.

“The primary mission of SCSD . . . is: to enforce the laws of the Commonwealth and to serve and protect the citizens of Suffolk County; to strengthen public safety through corrections and providing specialized support services to all criminal justice agencies; and to maintain the safe and secure custody and control of inmates and detainees while offering extensive rehabilitation opportunities to effectively reduce offender recidivism.”
The bottom line

The auditor found seven main problems, including missing proof of annual needs reviews, late or missing orientations, uncertified vocational instructors, missing education assessments or refusal forms, missing MAT consent forms, weak healthcare vendor monitoring, and missing education procedures.

“In addition to the conclusions we reached regarding our audit objectives, we also identified issues not specifically addressed by our objectives.”
What happens next

The Sheriff’s Department said it is making or planning changes, and the auditor plans to check back in about six months.

“As part of our post-audit review process, we will follow up on this matter in approximately six months.”
Why it's significant

The most serious practical risk is that poor oversight could mean medical issues are not handled on time, or are missed altogether, and vendor problems may go unnoticed.

“There is, therefore, a higher risk that sentenced inmates or pretrial detainees have not, and will not, have their healthcare issues properly resolved within the required timeframes or at all.”
Jargon, unpacked

A Health Service Request Form, or HSRF, is the form an incarcerated person uses to ask for medical, dental, or mental health care; the report also refers to this process as sick call.

“To request healthcare services, a sentenced inmate or pretrial detainee completes a sick call form, called the Health Service Request Form (HSRF), and states the type of service requested (medical, dental, or mental health).”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

SCSD could not show that it annually reviewed sentenced inmates’ needs.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: SCSD may not provide programs essential to sentenced inmates’ needs for successful reentry.

Standard: 103 CMR 936.03(2) and Section V of SCSD’s Social Services Policy S470 ( Section 936.03(2) of Title 103 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; Section V of SCSD’s Social Services Policy S470 )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should conduct and document annual reviews of sentenced inmates’ needs.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Moving forward SCSD will be requesting curricula from all internal and external partners to more formally review the programs provided and needs of the population."
Auditor: "We encourage SCSD to document the annual reviews it performs to ensure that it is in compliance."
SCSD did not ensure that all sentenced inmates received timely intake orientation.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Sentenced inmates may not be aware of their rights, responsibilities, or available programs and services.

Standard: Section IX of SCSD’s Social Services Policy S470 ( Section IX of SCSD’s Social Services Policy S470 )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should establish monitoring controls to ensure timely intake orientation.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "This discrepancy is a clerical error and has been updated in compliance with the standard and practice by the Department."
Auditor: "Based on its response and the updated policy, SCSD is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
SCSD did not ensure that all vocational instructors had or were pursuing required certifications.
licensing/inspectionsinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: SCSD may be out of compliance, inmates’ employment prospects may be harmed, and inmates may face higher safety risks.

Standard: 103 CMR 936.02(3) ( 103 CMR 936.02(3) )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should establish policies, procedures, and monitoring controls to ensure instructors have or are pursuing required certifications.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The department focuses primarily on an applicant’s skills, knowledge, and abilities rather than educational credentials alone."
Auditor: "However, we are auditing to the standards set forth in 103 CMR 936.02(3), which requires “all academic and vocational education personnel [to] meet certification requirements as stipulated by the Commonwealth’s [Department of Elementary and Secondary Education].”"
SCSD did not provide all educational assessments or keep required refusal forms.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: SCSD may be unable to show the Parole Board that inmates were informed of required literacy program obligations.

Standard: Section II of SCSD’s Academic and Vocational Arts Programs Policy S460 ( Section II of SCSD’s Academic and Vocational Arts Programs Policy S460 )

2 recommendations
  • SCSD should establish policies, procedures, and monitoring controls to retain documentation of educational assessment refusals.agency: already implemented
  • SCSD should establish monitoring controls to ensure inmates who score below eighth-grade reading level and refuse recommended programs sign refusal forms.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Since notification by the State Auditor’s office of this non-compliance, we have implemented a new process."
Auditor: "Based on its response, SCSD is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
SCSD did not obtain all required MAT Program consent forms.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Sentenced inmates may not have been informed of MAT Program requirements or treatment risks.

Standard: Procedure 1 of SCSD’s Substance Use Disorder Services Policy S473H ( Procedure 1 of SCSD’s Substance Use Disorder Services Policy S473H )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should provide and receive signed consent forms from all inmates enrolled in the MAT Program.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "SCSD will continue to work with our medical vendor to ensure consent to treat forms are complete prior to the administration of medication."
Auditor: "Based on its response, SCSD is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
SCSD did not implement prior recommendations to monitor its healthcare vendor’s sick call work.
vendor oversightinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: Healthcare issues may not be resolved within required timeframes, and poor vendor performance may go unnoticed and unaddressed.

Standard: Prior audit recommendation and Section 8.2.3 of SCSD’s internal control plan ( Audit No. 2022-1449-3J; Section 8.2.3 of SCSD’s internal control plan )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should establish sufficient monitoring controls over sick call to ensure vendor compliance with healthcare policies.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Additionally, SCSD has hired two medical and mental health licensed staff to assist in the oversight and monitoring of the contract and required services."
Auditor: "We are encouraged by the steps SCSD has taken regarding this matter, but we encourage it to establish sufficient monitoring controls over the sick call process as recommended."
SCSD lacked documented procedures for self-paced educational program enrollment and progress.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: SCSD may not be able to ensure sentenced inmates can start and proceed through programs at their own pace.

Standard: 103 CMR 936.02(4) ( 103 CMR 936.02(4) )

1 recommendation
  • SCSD should design and implement procedures documenting how inmates can start and proceed through programs at their own pace.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In an effort to comply with the auditor’s recommendations the department is currently reviewing and will update policy S460 to better reflect current practices."
Auditor: "Based on its response, SCSD is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."

Prior findings revisited

Still a problem
"SCSD did not implement our prior recommendations to establish policies and procedures over the monitoring of its healthcare vendor to ensure that the vendor complied with SCSD’s internal healthcare policies related to sick calls (SCSD’s Inmate Care and Treatment Policy S604)."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , including the prior audits referenced above.

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →