Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Salem State University (November 4, 2024)

November 4, 2024 · Salem State University · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗ · official site ↗

Published November 4, 2024 Audit covers January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2022 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found Salem State University did not always report campus crime statistics correctly and did not properly identify or train all people responsible for reporting campus safety information.
source
“SSU did not accurately report some required crime statistics in certain categories in its ASR.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of Salem State University covering January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022, focused on parts of the federal campus safety reporting law known as the Clery Act.

“In this performance audit, we examined SSU’s compliance with certain aspects of the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act), as amended.”
Why was it audited?

Because Salem State receives federal student aid funds, it must follow the Clery Act, which requires colleges to publish campus crime and safety information each year.

“As a participant in federal student financial aid programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, SSU is required to comply with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act).”
Why it matters

If the school reports crime data incorrectly, students, employees, families, and the public may get the wrong picture of campus safety.

“If SSU inaccurately reports its Clery Act crime statistics, current and prospective students, SSU employees, and members of the public may draw incorrect conclusions about campus safety.”
The bottom line

The auditor found problems in two main areas: some required crime statistics were wrong, and the university did not properly identify and train campus security authorities.

“SSU did not properly identify and train campus security authorities (CSAs).”
What happens next

Salem State said it agrees with the findings and is taking steps to fix the problems; the auditor said the office will check back in about six months.

“As part of our post-audit review process, we will follow up on this matter in approximately six months.”
Why it's significant

The issue is not just paperwork: inaccurate reporting can mislead the public and may also expose the university to federal fines.

“Additionally, not complying with the Clery Act’s ASR reporting requirements may result in SSU having to pay fines to the US Department of Education.”
Jargon, unpacked

A campus security authority, or CSA, is someone the university treats as responsible for receiving and reporting certain campus crime information, such as people involved in student housing, student discipline, athletics, or campus activities.

“According to No. 202 of Volume 79 of the Federal Register, dated October 20, 2014, CSA is a term used to define “an official of an institution who has significant responsibility for student and campus activities, including, but not limited to, student housing, student discipline, and campus judicial proceedings.””

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Salem State University inaccurately reported some required Clery Act crime statistics in its annual security report.
public safetyreporting timelinessrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Students, employees, prospective students, and the public may draw incorrect conclusions about campus safety, and SSU may face federal fines.

Standard: Section 668.46(c) of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations and US Department of Education record retention guidance for annual security reports. ( Section 668.46(c) of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations; US Department of Education’s Handbook for Campus Safety and Security Reporting )

1 recommendation
  • SSU should ensure that all Clery Act crimes within its Clery geography are accurately reflected in the daily crime log and ASR through policies and procedures covering accurate recording, Clery checkbox use, support retention, disciplinary incident recording, and reporting to SSUPD.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "We agree with the above finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, SSU is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Salem State University did not properly identify and train campus security authorities.
public safetyinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: SSU’s ability to compile and report accurate annual crime statistics is limited, which may misinform students, employees, prospective students, and the public about campus safety.

Standard: Section 668.46(a) of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the Clery Act Appendix for the Federal Student Aid Handbook. ( 34 CFR 668.46(a); Clery Act Appendix for the Federal Student Aid Handbook )

3 recommendations
  • SSU should establish a process for Human Resources and SSUPD to identify individuals who meet the CSA definition.agency: agreed
  • SSU should maintain and regularly update a list of identified CSAs.agency: agreed
  • SSU should notify CSAs and train them on their responsibilities at least annually.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "We agree with the above finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, SSU is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Salem State University .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →