Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Office of the Child Advocate (October 7, 2024)

October 7, 2024 · Office of the Child Advocate · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published October 7, 2024 Audit covers July 1, 2020 – March 31, 2022 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found that the Office of the Child Advocate did not always meet reporting, transparency, contract-tracking, and written documentation expectations during the audit period.
source
“Based on the results of our testing, we determined that OCA did not always advise the public and government stakeholders about how the Commonwealth may improve its services to and for children and their families during the audit period.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Office of the Child Advocate, covering mostly July 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) for the period July 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the office informed the public and state leaders, had procedures for cost-sharing decisions, and met requirements tied to its agreements and budget responsibilities.

“The purpose of this audit was to determine the following:”
Why it matters

The office’s work affects services for children, especially children involved with state systems like child welfare and juvenile justice.

“The office shall act to investigate and ensure that the highest quality of services and supports are provided to safeguard the health, safety and well-being of all children receiving services.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, this is about whether taxpayer-funded child-services work is documented, transparent, completed, and useful to decision-makers.

“If OCA does not receive all deliverables outlined in the ISAs that it funds, then there is a potential waste of taxpayer dollars that could be used to provide other OCA services or fund other ISA projects.”
The bottom line

Auditors found five main problems: missing written procedures, missing meeting minutes, a late report to lawmakers, missing proof that some contract work was done, and verbal instead of written contract changes.

“OCA was unable to provide evidence that 11 out of the 39 deliverables outlined in its ISAs with the University of Massachusetts (UMass) Chan Medical School and the UMass Boston Behavioral Health Integrated Resources for Children (BIRCh) Project were completed.”
What happens next

The report recommends that OCA write down procedures, publish meeting minutes, meet deadlines, document contract changes, and better coordinate on high-risk issues such as human trafficking.

“OCA should develop, document, and implement policies and procedures to monitor the progress of ISA deliverables.”
Why it's significant

The audit matters because delays, missing documentation, and weak oversight can make it harder for the public, lawmakers, and agencies to know whether children’s services are working as intended.

“By not having documented policies and procedures for the creation of its annual reports, OCA risks not providing timely, relevant information to stakeholders, policymakers, and the general public, who must make decisions about the services provided to children and the issues affecting them.”
Jargon, unpacked

An ISA is an interdepartmental service agreement, basically a formal agreement between state entities about work, payments, and deliverables.

“The Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth’s standard ISA form, which OCA used for these three ISAs with UMass Chan Medical School and the UMass Boston BIRCh Project, states,”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

OCA did not have documented policies and procedures for creating annual reports and other published documents.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: OCA risks not providing timely, relevant information to stakeholders, policymakers, and the public, potentially harming decisions about services for children.

Standard: Section 2(d) of Chapter 18C of the General Laws and OCA’s June 2021 internal control plan. ( Section 2(d) of Chapter 18C of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • OCA should document its standard protocol for creating and issuing annual reports.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The OCA acknowledges and appreciates this finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, OCA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
OCA did not publish annual Advisory Council meeting minutes for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
recordkeeping/documentationreporting timeliness

Why it matters: The public and government stakeholders may not be informed of the current status of OCA activities.

Standard: Section 2(d) of Chapter 18C of the General Laws and OCA’s June 2021 internal control plan. ( Section 2(d) of Chapter 18C of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • OCA should publish annual Advisory Council meeting minutes.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The OCA acknowledges and appreciates this finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, OCA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
OCA did not submit a required report to the Joint Committee by its deadline.
reporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: The committee’s ability to review and address child welfare concerns could be impeded by delayed reporting.

Standard: The Commonwealth’s enacted budget language for fiscal year 2022. ( Commonwealth’s enacted budget language for fiscal year 2022 )

2 recommendations
  • OCA should report to the Joint Committee by its deadlines.agency: agreed
  • OCA should ensure that any deadline extensions are approved in writing.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The OCA acknowledges and appreciates this finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, OCA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
OCA lacked evidence that some ISA deliverables were completed.
procurement/contractsrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: If deliverables are not received, taxpayer dollars could be wasted instead of funding OCA services or other ISA projects.

Standard: OCA’s enacted budgetary language for fiscal years 2020 through 2022 and the ISA deliverables. ( OCA’s enacted budgetary language for fiscal years 2020 through 2022 )

2 recommendations
  • OCA should document all information regarding deliverables, including amendments to ISAs.agency: agreed
  • OCA should develop, document, and implement policies and procedures to monitor ISA deliverables.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The OCA acknowledges and appreciates this finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, OCA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
OCA did not amend three ISAs in writing.
procurement/contractsrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: OCA cannot hold contracting agencies accountable or demonstrate satisfactory contract completion if amendments are only verbal.

Standard: Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth’s standard ISA form. ( Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth’s standard ISA form )

1 recommendation
  • OCA should obtain written approval and amend ISAs in writing for approved changes to deliverables.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The OCA acknowledges and appreciates this finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, OCA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
OCA should coordinate with other state agencies on screening returned foster-care children for human trafficking risk.
public safetyeligibility determinationinternal controls

Why it matters: Children who return to foster care after going missing may not be screened to determine whether they are, or are at risk of becoming, human trafficking victims.

Standard: OCA’s mission statement and statutory oversight role.

1 recommendation
  • OCA should collaborate with other state agencies to address, identify, and respond to human trafficking of children in Massachusetts.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The OCA is deeply invested in ensuring that the Commonwealth is addressing the risk of, and reality of, human trafficking."
Auditor: "We believe that OCA can be more effective in how it addresses the issue of human trafficking."
OCA did not have documented policies and procedures for developing temporary cost share agreements.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: OCA may delay necessary services to a child without procedures defining payment allocation, timing, and monitoring.

Standard: Section 2(e) of Chapter 18C of the Massachusetts General Laws and Section 16R of Chapter 6A of the General Laws. ( Section 2(e) of Chapter 18C of the Massachusetts General Laws; Section 16R of Chapter 6A of the General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • OCA should develop policies and procedures related to its involvement in the UPT review process.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Given the change in statute the OCA no longer has a formal role in developing temporary cost share agreements, and as a result we will not be developing any policies or procedures."
Auditor: "However, OCA should have been following the law while it was in effect."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Office of the Child Advocate .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →