Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Norfolk County Sheriff’s Office - A Review of Healthcare and Inmate Deaths (July 26, 2024)

July 26, 2024 · Norfolk County Sheriff’s Office · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published July 26, 2024 Audit covers July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2021 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found one main problem: the Norfolk County Sheriff’s Office could not show that one sampled inmate received the required medical screening when entering the jail.
source
“NSO did not complete an initial medical screening for one inmate upon their admission.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Norfolk County Sheriff’s Office, focused on inmate healthcare processes and inmate deaths during a two-year period.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Norfolk County Sheriff’s Office (NSO) for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the sheriff’s office followed rules for inmate deaths, healthcare oversight meetings, medical intake screenings, and sick-call care.

“The purpose of our audit was to determine the following:”
Why it matters

Missing an intake medical screening can mean health problems are not caught early, which can put the inmate, other inmates, and staff at risk.

“Because NSO did not complete an initial medical screening for this inmate, there was a higher-than-acceptable risk that this inmate’s medical issues were not identified and treated, potentially affecting the health and safety of this inmate, other inmates, and NSO employees.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, this audit is about whether a taxpayer-funded county jail is meeting basic healthcare and safety rules for people in custody.

“In fiscal years 2020 and 2021, NSO’s state appropriations were $32,843,581 and $35,543,400, respectively.”
The bottom line

Most tested areas passed, but the office needs stronger controls and records to prove every inmate gets the required intake medical screening.

“We determined that, during the audit period, 1 inmate out of our sample of 60 did not receive the initial medical screening upon admission.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended better monitoring and documentation, and said the office would be checked again after the audit.

“Our team will be conducting a post-audit review in roughly six months to follow up.”
Why it's significant

The report is significant because it found a gap in a basic jail healthcare safeguard and also flagged a recordkeeping issue with how sick-call requests are tracked.

“Because NSO does not use the full functionality of the CorEMR system for sick calls, it cannot reliably use the designed reporting functions of this s to better track all sick call requests.”
Jargon, unpacked

“Initial medical screening” means a health check done when someone enters the jail, before they are placed with the general jail population.

“This occurs before an inmate is placed in NSO’s general population to ensure that each inmate’s health needs are identified and addressed.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

NSO did not complete an initial medical screening for one inmate upon admission.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: There was a higher-than-acceptable risk that the inmate’s medical issues were not identified and treated, potentially affecting health and safety.

Standard: 103 CMR 932.06(1) and Section 601.13(1–2) of NSO’s Policy CSD 601 require initial medical screenings upon admission. ( Section 932.06(1) of Title 103 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; Section 601.13(1–2) (Receiving and Screening Procedures) of NSO’s Policy CSD 601 (Medical Services) )

2 recommendations
  • NSO should establish monitoring controls to ensure that it completes an initial medical screening upon each inmate’s admission.
  • NSO should retain documentation confirming that it completed each inmate’s initial medical screening.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "At this time, we have no requested edits or notes for clarification on the report."
Auditor: "We appreciate the department’s cooperation with our audit team and encourage NSO to implement our recommendations regarding this matter."