Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Nantucket County Sheriff’s Department

December 9, 2021 · Nantucket County Sheriff’s Department · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published December 9, 2021 Audit covers July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2020 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the Nantucket County Sheriff’s Department mishandled parts of its civil process work, especially tracking paperwork, fees, and oversight.
source
“The Nantucket County Sheriff’s Department (NCSD) did not properly administer the civil process.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Nantucket County Sheriff’s Department covering July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors looked at whether the department followed its own rules when preparing civil process paperwork, serving papers, and collecting fees.

“In this performance audit, we examined certain NCSD activities related to the civil process.”
Why it matters

If one person can handle a transaction from start to finish without review, mistakes or misuse of money are harder to catch.

“Without segregation of duties and management oversight, NCSD cannot ensure that civil process transactions are accurately processed, recorded, and reviewed.”
What's in it for me?

For residents and people using the sheriff’s civil process services, better records and fee tracking mean clearer accountability for services and payments.

“As a result, NCSD may not be able to identify what fees have been collected for the services provided.”
The bottom line

The department had weaknesses in oversight, recordkeeping, and fee collection for civil process services.

“Specifically, NCSD did not develop appropriate internal controls over civil processes, fill out its civil process spreadsheet completely, or record and collect all fees for civil process services provided.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended clearer written procedures, restricted spreadsheet access, more review, and better accounting and case management systems.

“NCSD should obtain an accounting system and a case management system to help record services provided and document fees collected.”
Why it's significant

The audit matters because the department handled 924 civil processes during the period, and auditors found missing or inconsistent fee and case information in the records they reviewed.

“Our data analysis showed that from the population of 924 civil processes, 68 were missing the fee amount, 3 were missing the type of service provided, 9 were missing the plaintiff’s name, and 2 were missing the defendant’s name and address.”
Jargon, unpacked

“Civil process” means the sheriff’s work serving legal documents such as summonses, complaints, subpoenas, and notices.

“The NCSD Civil Process Division is responsible for serving documents (summonses, complaints, subpoenas, and notices) for attorneys; individuals representing themselves; the state Department of Revenue; and district, state, and federal courts.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The department did not properly administer civil process activities.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationcash handling

Why it matters: The department could not ensure transactions were accurately processed, recorded, reviewed, collected, deposited, or reconciled.

Standard: Section 10.04 of the Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth’s June 2015 Internal Control Guide; Sections 04, 05, and 06(2) of the “Office of the Sheriff, Nantucket County, Civil Process and Procedures.” ( Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws; Section 10.04 of the Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth’s June 2015 Internal Control Guide; Section 04 of the “Office of the Sheriff, Nantucket County, Civil Process and Procedures”; Section 06(2) of the “Office of the Sheriff, Nantucket County, Civil Process and Procedures”; Section 05 of the “Office of the Sheriff, Nantucket County, Civil Process and Procedures” )

7 recommendations
  • NCSD should define and segregate duties in its written policies for authorizing transactions, recording transactions on the civil process spreadsheet, and reconciling transactions for its funds.agency: agreed
  • NCSD should implement closer supervision or more frequent reviews of civil process transactions.agency: agreed
  • NCSD should update the “Office of the Sheriff, Nantucket County, Civil Process and Procedures” regarding what information from the civil process jacket should be recorded on the civil process spreadsheet.agency: agreed
  • NCSD should restrict access to the civil process spreadsheet to specific users.agency: already implemented
  • NCSD should designate an employee who cannot make changes to the civil process spreadsheet to periodically review it for missing and inaccurate information.agency: agreed
  • NCSD should update the “Office of the Sheriff, Nantucket County, Civil Process and Procedures” to detail exactly what fields need to be filled out on the civil process jacket, as well as how and where to document the fees collected, including the payment method, payment amount, and collection date.agency: agreed
  • NCSD should obtain an accounting system and a case management system to help record services provided and document fees collected.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Per your recommendations regarding NCSD’s audit, we have installed Quicken for an improved accounting system to document fees collected, payment method, payment amount and collection date."
Auditor: "Based on the response above, it appears NCSD is making changes to address our concerns."