Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority

July 11, 2018 · Montachusett Regional Transit Authority · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published July 11, 2018 Audit covers July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2017 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found two main problems: MART did not send required financial data for public posting, and it did not properly track use of some agency vehicles.
source
“MART did not submit required financial information to the Commonwealth to be made available to the public on a searchable website.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority, covering July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority (MART) for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked vehicle maintenance, disability-accessible transportation equipment, use of agency vehicles that do not carry passengers, and whether MART shared financial records as required.

“We also examined MART’s use of its non-revenue-producing vehicles, as well as its compliance with the General Laws regarding providing its financial records to the Secretary of Administration and Finance for public disclosure.”
Why it matters

When financial records are not submitted for public posting, residents have less ability to see how a public transit agency spends money and how financially healthy it is.

“Therefore, MART did not allow the Commonwealth to give the public a sufficient level of transparency regarding MART’s operations, including its overall financial health and the nature and extent of its expenses.”
What's in it for me?

For residents, this matters because MART runs public transportation and special transportation services for communities, older adults, disabled residents, students, veterans, and others.

“MART provides several transportation options to assist elderly and disabled community residents, including transit services for member communities’ councils on aging and human service agencies as well as shared-ride services for disabled residents.”
The bottom line

Auditors found MART’s preventive maintenance records met the audit objective, but MART fell short on public financial reporting and tracking use of non-passenger vehicles.

“Did MART submit all required financial records to the Commonwealth for inclusion on the Commonwealth’s searchable website as required by Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the General Laws?”
What happens next

MART said it would work on getting its data onto the state website process and update vehicle-use policies and monitoring.

“MART will update its current policy and procedures to address all RTA and Operating Company employees following the vehicle use policy and procedure.”
Why it's significant

The audit is significant because MART handles large public transportation operations and funding, including more than $144 million in operating funding in fiscal year 2016 and nearly $160 million in fiscal year 2017.

“In fiscal years 2016 and 2017, MART received revenue from a variety of sources, including fares from riders and assistance from various federal, state, and local sources.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

MART did not submit required financial information for public disclosure on the Commonwealth’s searchable website.
reporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: The public lacked sufficient transparency into MART’s operations, financial health, and expenses.

Standard: Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws ( Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws; Section 14C(e) )

2 recommendations
  • MART should develop formal policies and procedures for submitting this required information to EOAF.agency: agreed
  • MART should establish monitoring controls to ensure that the staff members assigned to this task adhere to these policies and procedures.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MART will develop its policy and monitoring controls once the time lines and final delivery criteria have been agreed to with the State Comptroller’s Office."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MART is taking measures to ensure that it reports this required information to EOAF."
MART did not properly document operating-company employees’ use of non-revenue-producing vehicles.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsasset/inventory controlvendor oversight

Why it matters: There was a higher-than-acceptable risk that vehicles could be used for non-business purposes without detection.

Standard: MART Vehicles Policy, No. FIN-015, dated December 16, 2015

1 recommendation
  • MART should amend its policies for the use of its non-revenue-producing vehicles to indicate that they also apply to operating-company employees, including monitoring controls to ensure that they are adhered to.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MART will update its current policy and procedures to address all RTA and Operating Company employees following the vehicle use policy and procedure."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MART is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Montachusett Regional Transit Authority .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →