Audit of the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association (November 26, 2025)
November 26, 2025 · Massachusetts Sheriffs Association · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“MSA did not facilitate coordination or promote standardization of programs and services across sheriffs’ offices.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association, covering July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.
“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of certain activities of the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association (MSA) for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.”
Auditors checked whether the association followed up on earlier audit recommendations, especially around required capacity reports and coordinating programs across sheriff offices.
“In this performance audit, we examined whether MSA implemented recommendations from our prior audit report (Audit No. 2021-1447-3J) issued on June 28, 2022.”
When programs and reporting are inconsistent, it is harder for the public and state officials to know whether people in different counties are getting fair, comparable services.
“Inconsistent service levels create inequities in the state services administered by each sheriff’s office, meaning that some inmates may receive more or less, better or worse service based on the county in which they are incarcerated.”
For an ordinary resident, this matters because state leaders use these reports to understand jail conditions, program availability, and resource needs across Massachusetts.
“Missing or inaccurate data limits stakeholders’ ability to assess facility conditions and allocate resources effectively.”
The auditor concluded that MSA’s work on standardizing programs and data reporting was not strong enough, and that some required reports were incomplete.
“MSA did not ensure that data submitted in the PSI Matrix was standardized, complete, and properly formatted.”
MSA said it would improve its processes, and the auditor’s office said it plans to check back in about six months.
“As part of our post-audit review process, we will follow up on this matter in approximately six months.”
The report is significant because it points to statewide oversight problems: similar sheriff programs may differ widely, and the data meant to guide decisions may not be reliable enough.
“Inconsistent data also compromises the reliability of the Programs, Services, Interventions, and Reinvestments (PSI) Matrix as a tool for oversight and decision-making.”
Operational Capacity Reports are twice-yearly reports that show how Massachusetts correctional facilities are being used, including occupancy, beds, housing areas, and time inmates spend outside cells.
“Operational Capacity Reports (OCRs), required under Section 6A of Chapter 124 of the General Laws, are reports that track the occupancy levels and operational statuses of correctional facilities in the Commonwealth.”
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Did MSA submit complete and timely Occupational Capacity Reports to the Executive Office for Administration and Finance, the Senate and House Committees on Ways and Means, the Joint Committee on the Judiciary, and the Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, in accordance with Section 6A of Chapter 124 of the General Laws?
- Partially To what extent did MSA standardize and coordinate the programs and services offered by Commonwealth sheriffs’ offices, in accordance with state budget line item 8910-7110—Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association Main Appropriation?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Inconsistent program delivery makes it difficult to assess effectiveness, ensure equitable access, or compare services across jurisdictions.
Standard: State budget line item 8910-7110—Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association Main Appropriation. ( state budget line item 8910-7110—Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association Main Appropriation )
2 recommendations
- MSA should facilitate conversations among the county sheriffs’ offices to identify and develop best practices for administering programs that are similar in nature.agency: agreed
- MSA should enhance data validation procedures to ensure complete and consistent reporting across all county sheriffs’ offices, with periodic reviews conducted to monitor compliance and effectiveness.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association (MSA) welcomes the audit recommendations with regard to facilitating increased coordination in promotion of standardized delivery of programming across MSA member agencies."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MSA is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Why it matters: Formatting and data entry errors reduce the accuracy, consistency, and usefulness of the PSI Matrix for stakeholder review and decision-making.
Standard: State budget line item 8910-7110—Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association Main Appropriation. ( state budget line item 8910-7110—Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association Main Appropriation )
3 recommendations
- MSA should strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that data entered into the PSI Matrix is complete, properly formatted, and standardized across sheriffs’ offices.agency: agreed
- MSA should develop, document, and implement a process for reviewing and verifying submissions before final compilation to ensure accuracy and consistency.agency: agreed
- MSA should consider issuing more detailed guidance and offering regular training to sheriff’s office staff members who are responsible for data entry.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "While the MSA acknowledges the auditor’s recommendations with respect to data entry practices, it should be noted that a formal MSA data reporting policy was created and implemented in 2022 in response to Audit 2021–1447.31."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MSA is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Why it matters: Incomplete OCR data limits stakeholders’ ability to assess facility conditions, allocate resources, and rely on the reports.
Standard: Section 6A of Chapter 124 of the Massachusetts General Laws. ( Section 6A of Chapter 124 of the Massachusetts General Laws )
1 recommendation
- MSA should develop, document, and implement sufficient policies and procedures to ensure that sheriffs’ offices submit complete OCRs.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The MSA thanks the Auditing staff for their detailed review of the Operational Capacity Reports (OCR) and the recommendations for its improvement."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MSA is taking measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Sheriffs Association .
- Audit of the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ AssociationSheriff · June 28, 2022
- Massachusetts Sheriffs AssociationSheriff · December 7, 2016