Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Massachusetts Developmental Disabilities Council

February 7, 2019 · Massachusetts Developmental Disabilities Council · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published February 7, 2019 Audit covers October 1, 2016 – September 30, 2018 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The auditor checked how MDDC handled federal grant money passed on to partner organizations and found no major problems that had to be reported.
source
“Our audit revealed no significant instances of noncompliance by MDDC that must be reported under generally accepted government auditing standards.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Developmental Disabilities Council covering October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2018.

“This report details the audit objective, scope, and methodology for the audit period, October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2018.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors wanted to see whether MDDC properly managed grants it gave to sub-recipients, including whether it followed rules, contracts, and guidance.

“In this performance audit, we examined whether MDDC’s administration of its sub-recipient grants was consistent with applicable laws, regulations, contractual terms and conditions, and other guidance.”
Why it matters

The grant-funded work is meant to help people with developmental disabilities and their families get information and support that can improve independence and community inclusion.

“The intent of these projects is to provide information in various languages to people with developmental disabilities and their families to enhance their independence, productivity, and inclusion in the community.”
What's in it for me?

If you or someone you know has a developmental disability, this audit gives some assurance that the council’s reviewed grant process was working properly during the audit period.

“Does MDDC properly administer its federal grant program to sub-recipients, including authorizing, recording, and monitoring?”
The bottom line

The auditor’s answer to the main audit question was yes: MDDC properly administered the reviewed federal grant program.

“We determined that the data in DD Suite and MMARS were sufficiently reliable for the purposes of our audit.”
What happens next

The auditor discussed the report with agency management, and the report reflects management’s comments.

“My audit staff discussed the contents of this report with management of the agency, whose comments are reflected in this report.”
Why it's significant

This matters because MDDC handled about $1.9 million in fiscal year 2017 and $1.8 million in fiscal year 2018, so the audit looked at public grant oversight for a meaningful amount of funding.

“During our audit period, MDDC had a budget of approximately $1.9 million for fiscal year 2017 and $1.8 million for fiscal year 2018.”
Jargon, unpacked

“Sub-recipients” means the partner organizations MDDC chooses to carry out grant-funded projects.

“MDDC selects partnering entities (called sub-recipients) to carry out the projects described in its plan.”

What the Auditor checked

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Developmental Disabilities Council .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →