Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources - Green Communities Division

November 10, 2021 · Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources—Green Communities Division · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published November 10, 2021 Audit covers July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2020 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the Green Communities Division generally reviewed applications properly, but it missed two oversight duties: some towns did not file required annual reports, and some grant spending lacked documentation.
source
“GCD did not ensure that all green communities submitted their required annual reports.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Department of Energy Resources' Green Communities Division, covering July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether cities and towns qualified for green community status, whether they kept filing required annual reports, and whether grant money was used as intended.

“In this performance audit, we determined whether GCD ensured that municipalities applying for green community designation met all of the required criteria, whether municipalities that were designated as green communities submitted their required annual reports, and whether grant funding distributed through DOER’s Green Communities Designation and Grant Program was used for its intended purposes.”
Why it matters

If towns do not submit annual reports, the state cannot be sure they still meet green community requirements, and the Legislature may receive incomplete or wrong information.

“Further, since DOER uses the information in these municipal reports to produce its annual report for the state Legislature, the information in DOER’s annual report may be incomplete and inaccurate.”
What's in it for me?

This affects residents because the program is meant to help communities cut energy use, lower energy costs, and support clean energy projects.

“GCD was created by the Green Communities Act (Chapter 169 of the Acts of 2008) to help municipalities become more sustainable in terms of their energy needs, control rising energy costs, and facilitate the use of clean energy technologies (e.g., solar).”
The bottom line

The biggest problems were missing required annual reports and $46,471 in grant spending that was not properly justified with documentation.

“During our audit period, GCD did not obtain documentation to justify $46,471 of administrative expenses for which 8 of the 21 green communities in our sample requested reimbursement through the Green Communities Designation and Grant Program.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended stronger monitoring, and the department said it would notify communities that miss reports and require better documentation before paying administrative grant costs.

“Based on its response, DOER is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter.”
Why it's significant

This was not a finding that the whole program failed; the audit found that applications were properly supported, but ongoing reporting and some grant documentation needed better controls.

“Based on the results of our data reliability assessment, we determined that the information obtained for our audit period was sufficiently reliable for the purposes of our audit work.”
Jargon, unpacked

A “green community” is a city or town that meets state criteria related to clean energy, energy savings, efficient vehicles, and energy-conscious construction rules.

“To be designated as a green community, a city or town must apply to DOER to be designated as such and demonstrate that it has done the following:”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

GCD did not ensure that all green communities submitted required annual reports.
reporting timelinessinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: GCD could not be sure municipalities remained compliant with green community criteria, and DOER’s annual report to the Legislature could be incomplete or inaccurate.

Standard: DOER’s Guide to Internal Controls; GCD’s “Being a Green Community” policy; Section 10(f) of Chapter 25A of the Massachusetts General Laws ( Section 10(f) of Chapter 25A of the Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • GCD should establish monitoring controls over its green communities’ reporting process that will allow it to identify green communities that have not submitted their required annual reports in a timely manner and prompt them to do so.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In response to the recommendation, DOER will revise its report review procedures and will notify green communities that haven’t submitted their annual reports and request that they do so."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DOER is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."
GCD did not ensure that green communities documented the need for some designation grant administrative expenses.
grants managementrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Without documentation, GCD could not ensure that the administrative expenses were consistent with grant requirements.

Standard: GCD’s Green Community and Grant Program Guidance; Section 2.07(1) of Title 815 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations ( Section 2.07(1) of Title 815 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations )

1 recommendation
  • GCD should establish monitoring controls over the use of Green Communities Designation and Grant Program funding to ensure that funds used by grantees to pay for administrative expenses are properly documented.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In response to the recommendation, GCD has bolstered controls focused on administrative costs to ensure that funds paid to grantees for management or administration are properly documented."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DOER is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."