Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC)

January 9, 2020 · Massachusetts Department of Correction · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published January 9, 2020 Audit covers July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2018 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that the Department of Correction did not always meet its own rules for inmate sick-call requests and did not always keep records proving that release-planning health services were provided.
source
“During the audit period, Sick Call Request Forms (SCRFs) were not processed or triaged within 24 hours (72 on weekends) and/or were not completely filled out by nurses and/or physicians, and inmates were not always seen by a qualified healthcare professional within seven days after they submitted SCRFs.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Department of Correction covering July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors looked at whether incarcerated people had proper access to healthcare, including sick-call requests, healthcare planning before release, and certain women’s healthcare services.

“In this performance audit, we examined inmate access to healthcare, including sick call requests, reentry healthcare services, and women’s specific healthcare services related to pregnancy and annual preventive examinations.”
Why it matters

Late or undocumented medical responses can allow health problems to get worse and can expose the state to legal risk.

“Without timely treatment for physical and mental health issues, an inmate’s condition could worsen.”
What's in it for me?

For ordinary residents, this report is about whether the state prison system follows basic health and release-planning rules for people in its custody, which affects public safety, government accountability, and healthcare continuity after release.

“DOC is responsible for providing reentry services to all inmates to ensure successful transition from the inmate population into the community.”
The bottom line

The audit found two main problems: sick-call standards were not consistently followed, and DOC did not always keep proof that important reentry healthcare steps happened.

“DOC did not always maintain documentation to support the following: that Individual Reentry Plans were reviewed with the inmates, signed by the inmates, and provided to the inmates before release; that physical and mental health appointments for post-release services were scheduled with external medical providers when necessary; and that DOC obtained signed Authorizations for Release of Medical Records from inmates.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended stronger controls, monitoring, training, job aids, and review of whether reentry staff should focus only on reentry work.

“DOC should ensure that there are internal controls and monitoring in place to ensure compliance with DOC policies and procedures.”
Why it's significant

The findings are significant because the audit identified repeated documentation and timing problems in core prison healthcare processes, even though DOC is responsible for thousands of inmates across Massachusetts facilities.

“As of June 2018, DOC was responsible for 8,741 inmates housed in 16 correctional facilities (see Appendix A) across the Commonwealth and had approximately 4,600 employees.”
Jargon, unpacked

A Sick Call Request Form is the form an incarcerated person uses to ask for medical, dental, or mental health care; an Individual Reentry Plan is a release plan covering issues like healthcare, housing, Medicaid, employment, and community resources.

“To request access to healthcare, an inmate completes an SCRF, selecting a type of service requested (medical, dental, or mental health); stating the nature of the problem or request; and adding his/her name, inmate commitment number, and signature, as well as the date.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Department of Correction did not process sick call requests on time, fully document them, or always show inmates were seen within required timeframes.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: Without timely treatment, inmate health conditions could worsen, and DOC faces legal risk when it cannot document prompt triage and care.

Standard: DOC policy “103 DOC 630—Medical Services”; Section 761.07(7) of Title 103 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; National Commission on Correctional Health Care Standards for Health Services in Prisons. ( Section 10(4) of DOC policy “103 DOC 630—Medical Services”; Section 761.07(7) of Title 103 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; National Commission on Correctional Health Care publication Standards for Health Services in Prisons )

1 recommendation
  • DOC should ensure that there are internal controls and monitoring in place to ensure compliance with DOC policies and procedures.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "HSD will work with its contracted healthcare vendor to reinforce the requirement that all fields must be completed."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DOC is taking measures to clarify existing policies and ensure that they are consistently applied throughout all its facilities."
DOC did not always keep documentation showing that required reentry healthcare planning was completed.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Inmates may miss needed appointments, run out of medication, lack health insurance information, lose continuity of care, and DOC may face legal risk.

Standard: DOC Reentry Services Operations Manual; Section 8(B) of “103 DOC 493—Reentry Policy”; Section 21 of “103 DOC 630—Medical Services”. ( DOC Reentry Services Operations Manual; Section 8(B) of “103 DOC 493—Reentry Policy”; Section 21 of “103 DOC 630—Medical Services” )

2 recommendations
  • DOC should ensure that its staff is properly trained in reentry service standards and provide job aids for all aspects of the reentry process.
  • DOC should evaluate whether it would be useful to have employees work solely in reentry rather than doing multiple jobs, thereby ensuring that these employees can focus on reentry and the applicable standards and timelines.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Taking into account the Auditor’s findings, the DOC will review its current policies and staff training procedures for inmate reentry."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Department of Correction .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →