Audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (MCCA)
February 16, 2021 · Massachusetts Convention Center Authority · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“We conducted this performance audit to determine whether the Authority effectively administered its management services agreement with MGM Springfield to operate the MMC to ensure its financial stability.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority, focused on how it oversaw the MassMutual Center in Springfield from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019.
“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019.”
The auditor first looked broadly at whether the Authority was overseeing its facilities for long-term financial stability, then narrowed the review to the MassMutual Center because of risk concerns.
“After a risk analysis, we narrowed our topic to focus on the financial stability of the MassMutual Center (MMC) in Springfield.”
The MassMutual Center relies more heavily on public support than the Authority’s other facilities, so weak oversight can affect public money and confidence in how the center is run.
“During this period, the MMC’s coverage ratio was significantly lower than those of the Authority’s other facilities.”
If you are a Massachusetts taxpayer, visitor, or Springfield-area resident, this matters because the center is publicly owned, supports events and economic activity, and may need public funds when its own revenue does not cover costs.
“The Massachusetts Convention Center Authority is an independent public authority of the Commonwealth that owns and operates several public facilities primarily for conventions, tradeshows, and industry meetings.”
The auditor concluded that the Authority did not effectively manage the MGM Springfield agreement according to the contract and the Authority’s own procurement guidelines.
“Did the Authority effectively administer its management services agreement with MGM Springfield to operate the MassMutual Center (MMC) in accordance with the agreement’s terms and the Authority’s “Procurement Guidelines: Goods and Services”?”
The report recommends that the Authority strengthen oversight: finish billing procedures, monitor billing and settlements, make sure maintenance reports are provided, and document contract-renewal assessments.
“The Authority should establish monitoring controls over the MMC contract to ensure that the contract administrator documents the required assessments in accordance with Authority policy.”
The audit is significant because the problems were not just paperwork issues; the auditor said they could allow billing or other errors to happen without being caught.
“However, the numerous exceptions we identified indicate significant control deficiencies that could result in material billing errors and other errors occurring and going undetected.”
A coverage ratio is a basic measure of how much of a facility’s operating costs are paid by the money the facility brings in, instead of needing outside support.
“The Authority’s management uses the coverage ratio, an industry standard performance metric, to measure the extent to which its gross operating revenue covers its operating expenses.”
6 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Did the Authority effectively administer its management services agreement with MGM Springfield to operate the MassMutual Center (MMC) in accordance with the agreement’s terms and the Authority’s “Procurement Guidelines: Goods and Services”?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: The Authority could not be certain that MGM Springfield was properly accounting for all event revenue and expenditures.
Standard: The management services agreement required MGM Springfield to maintain detailed, accurate, and complete financial and other records, and required the Authority’s contract administrator to monitor contract compliance. ( Section 16.2.3 of the management services agreement; Section 2.2.15 of the management services agreement )
2 recommendations
- The Authority and MGM Springfield should complete and implement financial policies and procedures to oversee billing and settlement of events at the MMC.agency: already implemented
- The Authority should monitor the settlement and billing process to ensure compliance with these guidelines.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Authority and MGM Springfield have taken several significant steps to improve financial activities and procedures at the MassMutual Center and these efforts were already underway during the audit period."
Auditor: "OSA acknowledges that the transaction amounts in question may not be material in terms of the total dollar amount of the transactions MGM Springfield processed during the audit period."
Why it matters: Without annual and quarterly maintenance reporting, the Authority could not effectively monitor scheduled preventive maintenance and warranties.
Standard: The management services agreement required MGM Springfield to provide annual schedules of maintenance contracts and warranties and quarterly maintenance reports and schedules. ( Section 2.2.12 of the management services agreement; Section 16.2.3 of the management services agreement )
2 recommendations
- The Authority should ensure that its contract administrator and MGM Springfield are aware of the contractual requirement that MGM Springfield provide the Authority with facility maintenance information.agency: already implemented
- The Authority should establish monitoring controls to ensure that MGM Springfield provides it with all contractually required facility maintenance reports.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Authority asserts that the communication it has received from MGM Springfield is above and beyond contractual requirements and, as of October 27, 2020, a Quarterly and Annual reporting process has been implemented as suggested in Finding 2."
Auditor: "During our audit, we were not provided with any documentation to substantiate that MGM Springfield provided this information to the Authority in the manner prescribed by the contract; this fact is not disputed by the Authority."
Why it matters: Without a documented assessment, the Authority lacked evidence that extending the management services agreement was the best option.
Standard: Chapter 30B requires written assessment of the costs and benefits before exercising a contract renewal, extension, or purchase option, and the Authority’s procurement guidelines elected to follow Chapter 30B. ( Chapter 30B of the Massachusetts General Laws; The Authority’s “Procurement Guidelines: Goods and Services” )
2 recommendations
- The Authority should ensure that MGM Springfield is aware of and fulfills all its responsibilities as detailed in the contract.agency: disagreed
- The Authority should establish monitoring controls over the MMC contract to ensure that the contract administrator documents the required assessments in accordance with Authority policy.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Authority does not agree that the absence of a “written report” required under rules it voluntarily elects to follow means that it lacked the necessary information to assess MGM Springfield’s performance."
Auditor: "Although such deliberations may have occurred, we were not made aware of them during our audit and have not been provided with any documentation to substantiate when they occurred, what was discussed, or what was the basis of the Authority’s management decision to extend the contract."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Convention Center Authority .
- Massachusetts Convention Center AuthorityAuthority / Commission · MARCH 31, 1999
- Massachusetts Convention Center AuthorityAuthority / Commission · January 20, 2012
- Audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (August 19, 2024)Authority / Commission · August 19, 2024