Audit of the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct (November 26, 2025)
November 26, 2025 · Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“CJC’s website was not fully accessible to all website users.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, the agency that handles complaints and discipline involving state judges.
“CJC investigates allegations of misconduct by state court judges; investigates allegations that a judge has a disability preventing them from properly performing their judicial duties; and performs remedial actions or discipline against judges when necessary.”
Auditors checked whether the commission’s website met accessibility rules for things like keyboard use, navigation, language, error messages, and color contrast.
“The purpose of this performance audit was to determine whether CJC’s website adhered to the World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 for user accessibility, keyboard accessibility, navigation accessibility, language, error identification, and color accessibility.”
If the website is not accessible, people with disabilities may have a harder time getting information or using online services from the commission.
“Noncompliance with WCAG 2.1 reduces accessibility for individuals with disabilities and limits equitable access to CJC information and services.”
For an ordinary resident, this matters because the website is where people can file complaints about judges and learn how the complaint process works.
“On CJC’s website, users can file complaints against judges, learn about the complaint process, as well as review past complaints and CJC’s annual reports.”
Auditors tested 20 webpages and found 2 that did not meet accessibility standards: one had a broken link, and one could not be fully used with a keyboard.
“We reviewed a sample of 20 webpages and found that 2 webpages were not compliant with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1.”
The auditor’s office said it will check back in about six months to see what the commission has done about the issue.
“As part of our post-audit review process, we will follow up on this matter in approximately six months.”
This is significant because government websites are a major way people get public information and services, so accessibility problems can block equal access.
“Government websites are an important way for the general public to access government information and services.”
WCAG is a set of website accessibility guidelines meant to help make websites usable by people with disabilities.
“In 1999, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), an international nongovernmental organization responsible for internet standards, published the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0 to provide guidance on how to make web content more accessible to people with disabilities.”
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Did CJC’s website comply with the Executive Office of Technology Services and Security’s Enterprise Information Technology Accessibility Policy and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 for user accessibility, keyboard accessibility, navigation accessibility, language accessibility, error identification, and color accessibility?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Noncompliance reduced accessibility for individuals with disabilities and limited equitable access to CJC information and services, including risks from broken hyperlinks and inaccessible keyboard navigation.
Standard: World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1, Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard and Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways. ( Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard (Level A); Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways (Level AA) )
2 recommendations
- CJC should continually review its webpages to ensure that all hyperlinks lead to related information.
- CJC should ensure that its webpages provide equitable access to critical information and services offered online.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Commission is continuing to work to solve [the issue related to Success Criterion 2.1.1], but it appears to be a problem related to the “binder” page template provided by [the Executive Office of Technology Services and Security]."
Auditor: "Based on its response, CJC has taken measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct .
- Audit of the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct (CJC)Authority / Commission · May 28, 2021
- Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct-Examination of Annual Internal Control QuestionnaireAuthority / Commission · February 23, 2016