Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

April 4, 2022 · Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗ · official site ↗

Published April 4, 2022 Audit covers January 1, 2019 – December 31, 2020 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that MCAD was too slow in many discrimination investigations and also had weaknesses in handling COVID relief funds and cybersecurity training.
source
“MCAD did not complete discrimination investigations on time.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination, covering January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination (MCAD) for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors looked at whether MCAD handled discrimination cases on time, managed CARES Act money properly, and trained staff who handled those funds on cybersecurity.

“Additionally, we assessed whether MCAD had created a process for ensuring that Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funds received complied with the policies issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth (CTR).”
Why it matters

When discrimination cases drag on, people waiting for answers may be denied a timely resolution.

“If investigations take an excessive time to complete, individuals who have allegedly been subjected to discrimination are deprived of timely resolution.”
What's in it for me?

If you live, work, visit, rent, apply for housing, go to school, or seek services in Massachusetts, MCAD is one of the agencies meant to protect you from discrimination.

“We protect the people of Massachusetts, our workers, and our visitors from discriminatory treatment based on your membership in a protected class, such as race, color, creed, national origin, age, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and more.”
The bottom line

Nearly half of the discrimination investigations completed during the audit period took longer than allowed.

“During the audit period, the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination (MCAD) exceeded the allowable timeframe for completing 1,308 (45.8%) of the 2,854 discrimination investigations it completed.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that MCAD figure out how many investigators it needs, fix delays inside investigations, notify state finance officials about CARES Act funds, update its internal controls, and provide annual cybersecurity training.

“MCAD should determine the number of investigators required to complete investigations on time.”
Why it's significant

The report matters because delays, weak fund tracking, outdated controls, and missed cybersecurity training can affect fairness, accountability, and protection of sensitive information.

“Incomplete cybersecurity awareness training may lead to user error and compromise the integrity and security of protected information in MCAD’s information technology systems.”
Jargon, unpacked

A “backlog” means investigations that took longer than the legal time limit; CARES Act funds were federal COVID relief money; an internal control plan is an agency’s written system for reducing risks and managing processes.

“MCAD uses the term “backlog” to mean the population of investigations that took longer to complete than the time allowed by Section 1.05 of Title 804 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

MCAD did not complete discrimination investigations within required timeframes.
reporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: Delayed investigations can deprive people alleging discrimination of timely resolution.

Standard: Section 1.05 of Title 804 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations ( Section 1.05 of Title 804 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations )

2 recommendations
  • MCAD should determine the number of investigators required to complete investigations on time.agency: agreed
  • MCAD should identify and resolve the cause of the long durations between events that occurred during some investigations that were not completed on time.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The agency agrees with the auditor’s recommendation that the requisite number of investigators should be hired to compete investigations within the regulatory timeframes."
Auditor: "We agree that the effort to increase the number of investigators to pre-pandemic levels should address our recommendations."
MCAD did not notify CTR of CARES Act funds or update its internal control plan.
grants managementinternal controls

Why it matters: CARES Act funds could be commingled with other funds, and outdated internal controls could leave MCAD vulnerable to risks.

Standard: CTR’s “COVID-19 Revenue and Grants” policy and “COVID-19 Pandemic Response Internal Controls Guidance” ( CTR’s “COVID-19 Revenue and Grants” policy; CTR’s “COVID-19 Pandemic Response Internal Controls Guidance” )

2 recommendations
  • MCAD should notify CTR when it receives any CARES Act funds.agency: agreed
  • MCAD should draft a “COVID-19 Pandemic Response Plan Appendix,” incorporate it into its ICP, and annually review and update the ICP and appendix with any changes necessary.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The agency agrees with the auditor’s findings and will work to implement the auditor’s recommendations."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MCAD is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."
MCAD did not provide annual cybersecurity awareness training to staff managing CARES Act funds.
cybersecuritydata privacyinternal controls

Why it matters: Lack of training may lead to user error and compromise protected information in MCAD systems.

Standard: Section 6.2.4 of EOTSS Information Security Risk Management Standard IS.010 ( Section 6.2.4 of EOTSS Information Security Risk Management Standard IS.010 )

1 recommendation
  • MCAD should coordinate with EOTSS to ensure that cybersecurity awareness training is held annually for all employees.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The agency has coordinated with the Commonwealth’s Human Resources Division (HRD) to provide the requisite, yearly Cybersecurity training to MCAD via the new MassAchieve platform [in] which the MCAD is now a fully participating agency."
Auditor: "Based on its response, MCAD is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →