Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority

October 10, 2018 · Martha's Vineyard Regional Transit Authority · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published October 10, 2018 Audit covers July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2017 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Auditors found two main problems: the transit authority did not send required financial data to the state for public posting, and it did not keep proper records when employees used agency vehicles that do not carry passengers.
source
“VTA did not submit required financial information to the Commonwealth to be made available to the public on a searchable website.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority covering July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority (VTA) for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.”
Why was it audited?

The audit checked vehicle maintenance, use of agency vehicles that do not earn fare revenue, and whether VTA shared required financial records for public disclosure.

“We also examined VTA’s use of its non-revenue-producing vehicles, as well as its compliance with the General Laws regarding providing its financial records to the Secretary of Administration and Finance for public disclosure.”
Why it matters

The missing financial reporting made it harder for the public to see how VTA was spending money and understand its financial condition.

“Therefore, VTA did not allow the Commonwealth to give the public a sufficient level of transparency regarding VTA’s operations, including its overall financial health and the nature and extent of its expenses.”
What's in it for me?

If you live on or visit Martha’s Vineyard, this matters because VTA provides local bus and paratransit service, and public oversight helps show whether transit resources are being managed properly.

“During peak tourist season in Martha’s Vineyard, VTA provides transportation to tourists, residents, and employees of tourist attractions.”
The bottom line

The audit did not report a problem with preventive maintenance, but it found failures in public financial reporting and vehicle-use documentation.

“Did VTA maintain a cost maintenance log for each vehicle to ensure that preventive maintenance for vehicles and equipment for transporting passengers with disabilities under the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 was up to date per Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines?”
What happens next

VTA said it would work with state officials on reporting financial data and would update its policies for tracking non-revenue vehicle use.

“VTA will revise its policy and procedures for the oversight and use of its non-revenue vehicles to incorporate best practices from other RTAs and MassDOT.”
Why it's significant

The findings point to basic accountability gaps: the public could not easily see required financial information, and VTA had a higher risk that staff vehicles could be misused without being noticed.

“As a result of the lack of monitoring of use, there is a higher-than-acceptable risk that these vehicles may be used for non-business purposes without detection.”
Jargon, unpacked

A non-revenue-producing vehicle is an agency vehicle used by employees for work, not a bus or vehicle that collects fares from passengers.

“Non-revenue-producing vehicles are light-duty vehicles for temporary use by VTA employees for agency-related business.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

VTA did not submit required financial information for public disclosure on the Commonwealth’s searchable website.
reporting timelinessrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: The public lacked sufficient transparency into VTA’s operations, financial health, and expenses.

Standard: Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws ( Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws; Section 14C(e) of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • Develop formal policies and procedures for submitting required financial information to the Executive Office for Administration and Finance.agency: agreed
  • Establish monitoring controls to ensure assigned staff follow the policies and procedures.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "VTA will develop its policy and monitoring controls once the timelines and final delivery criteria have been agreed to with the Office of the Comptroller."
Auditor: "Based on its response, VTA is taking measures to ensure that it properly reports this information."
VTA did not properly document employee use of non-revenue-producing vehicles.
asset/inventory controlrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: There was a higher-than-acceptable risk that vehicles could be used for non-business purposes without detection.

Standard: Massachusetts Department of Transportation Motor Vehicles Policy, No. P-D0032-01, dated October 5, 2016

2 recommendations
  • Establish policies and procedures, consistent with MassDOT’s, requiring a log for non-revenue-producing vehicle use.agency: agreed
  • Include monitoring controls to ensure the policies and procedures are followed.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "VTA will revise its policy and procedures for the oversight and use of its non-revenue vehicles to incorporate best practices from other RTAs and MassDOT."
Auditor: "Based on its response, VTA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Martha's Vineyard Regional Transit Authority .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →