Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Lowell Regional Transit Authority (June 7, 2023)

June 7, 2023 · Lowell Regional Transit Authority · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published June 7, 2023 Audit covers October 1, 2019 – September 30, 2021 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found that Lowell Regional Transit Authority had weaknesses in how it oversaw disability paratransit service and handled complaints.
source
“LRTA did not comply with accessibility requirements, or follow required procedures, for ADA paratransit complaints.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Lowell Regional Transit Authority, focused on its ADA paratransit service during October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2021.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Lowell Regional Transit Authority (LRTA).”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether required paratransit rides were on time and whether complaints from paratransit riders were handled properly.

“In this performance audit, we determined whether LRTA delivered on-time paratransit services required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in accordance with its “Road Runner Standard Operating Procedures,” and its contract with MV Transportation.”
Why it matters

People with disabilities rely on paratransit when they cannot use regular bus routes, so poor oversight can affect whether they get timely and adequate transportation.

“As a result of LRTA not including minimum on-time performance standards and measures in its contract with, or verifying ride data in reports provided by, MV Transportation, LRTA cannot ensure that ADA-required paratransit services provided are adequate and timely and reports provided to state and federal authorities are accurate.”
What's in it for me?

If you use LRTA paratransit, this matters because the report calls for clearer complaint information, better tracking, and faster complaint acknowledgements.

“LRTA should ensure that complainants receive acknowledgements of their complaints within two business days.”
The bottom line

LRTA generally had on-time service data, but the audit found it lacked contract standards, did not verify contractor reports, and did not properly advertise or track ADA paratransit complaints.

“LRTA did not identify minimum on-time performance standards and measures for, or verify the accuracy of reports provided by, its paratransit management contractor.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that LRTA strengthen contracts, verify ride data, update its website, track complaints, and make sure complaint forms and responses are handled properly.

“Based on the response above, LRTA is taking measures to address our concerns.”
Why it's significant

This report is significant because it points to oversight gaps in a public transit service used by riders with disabilities across the greater Lowell area.

“This could have a negative impact on the quality of services provided to LRTA’s ADA-required paratransit riders.”
Jargon, unpacked

ADA paratransit means special transit service for people with disabilities that must be comparable to regular fixed-route transit service.

“Each public entity operating a fixed route system shall provide paratransit or other special service to individuals with disabilities that is comparable to the level of service provided to individuals without disabilities who use the fixed route system.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

LRTA did not set minimum on-time performance standards in its paratransit contract or verify contractor reports.
procurement/contractsvendor oversightinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: LRTA cannot ensure that ADA-required paratransit services are adequate and timely or that reports to state and federal authorities are accurate.

Standard: Section 37.23(a) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and LRTA’s Request for Proposals for Paratransit Management Services. ( Section 37.23(a) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations; LRTA’s Request for Proposals for Paratransit Management Services )

2 recommendations
  • LRTA should ensure that its paratransit management contracts include performance surety language and minimum on-time performance standards and measures. It should also develop a policy to include this information in its contracts.agency: agreed
  • LRTA should implement monitoring controls to ensure that its employees verify that ADA-required paratransit ride information provided by MV Transportation is complete and accurate.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "Per the Auditor’s recommendation, the LRTA has implemented additional data validation processes."
Auditor: "Based on the response above, LRTA is taking measures to address our concerns."
LRTA did not properly advertise, track, process, and document ADA paratransit complaints.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsvendor oversight

Why it matters: ADA-required paratransit riders may not know how to communicate concerns, and LRTA may not identify and remediate significant service issues.

Standard: Section 27.13(b) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and LRTA’s “Road Runner Standard Operating Procedure.” ( Section 27.13(b) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations; LRTA’s “Road Runner Standard Operating Procedure” )

5 recommendations
  • LRTA should update its website to include the process for filing an ADA paratransit complaint.agency: already implemented
  • LRTA should update its website to include the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the designated LRTA employee responsible for overseeing MV Transportation’s administration of the ADA paratransit complaint process.agency: already implemented
  • LRTA should ensure that MV Transportation fills out a complaint form for each ADA paratransit complaint received.
  • LRTA should implement a complaint log (manual or electronic) that includes the date each complaint was received and a complaint identification number to ensure that MV Transportation records all complaints it receives for LRTA.agency: already implemented
  • LRTA should ensure that complainants receive acknowledgements of their complaints within two business days.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The LRTA has initiated additional steps in the process to increase administrative oversight:"
Auditor: "Based on the response above, LRTA is taking measures to address our concerns."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Lowell Regional Transit Authority .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →