Audit of the Human Resources Division
February 14, 2019 · Human Resources Division · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“HRD did not always ensure that executive branch agencies filed required affirmative action and diversity plans in a timely manner.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a performance audit of the Massachusetts Human Resources Division, covering July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017.
“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Human Resources Division (HRD) for the period July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017.”
Auditors checked whether HRD was making executive branch agencies follow Executive Order 526, including rules about submitting affirmative action and diversity plans and whether HRD took action when agencies did not comply.
“In this performance audit, we examined HRD’s compliance with Executive Order (EO) 526, including determining whether HRD ensured that executive branch agencies complied with reporting requirements for affirmative action plans and diversity plans and whether HRD imposed any remedial courses of action on noncompliant agencies.”
These plans are meant to help state agencies remove discriminatory barriers, improve equal opportunity, and build a more diverse workforce.
“All state agencies shall develop and implement affirmative action and diversity plans to identify and eliminate discriminatory barriers in the workplace; remedy the effects of past discriminatory practices; identify, recruit, hire, develop, promote, and retain employees who are members of under-represented groups; and ensure diversity and equal opportunity in all facets, terms, and conditions of state employment.”
For residents, the issue is whether state government is actually tracking and enforcing its own equal opportunity and diversity commitments in hiring and workplace practices.
“Reports help agencies create inclusive and diverse workforces.”
The auditor concluded that HRD did not make sure agencies filed required plans and progress reports, and did not take remedial action against agencies that failed to comply.
“Despite the significant number of executive branch agencies that HRD identified through monitoring that did not file the required plans, HRD had not taken any remedial actions to enforce agency compliance.”
The report recommends that HRD create and enforce clear policies, monitoring controls, reminders, and consequences for agencies that do not submit required reports.
“HRD should develop policies and procedures to monitor the tracking of all affirmative action and diversity plan progress reports to ensure that all agencies are working toward, and reporting on, meeting their goals in the two-year plan cycle.”
An affirmative action plan is a state agency’s plan for addressing past discrimination by improving opportunities for under-represented groups. A diversity plan is about valuing differences among employees and creating an inclusive workplace.
“A policy or program that seeks to redress past discrimination by increasing opportunities for under-represented groups.”
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Did HRD ensure that executive branch agencies’ affirmative action and diversity plans complied with the reporting requirements of Executive Order (EO) 526?
- Did not comply Did HRD impose remedial courses of action on executive branch agencies that did not complete affirmative action and diversity plans in accordance with EO 526?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: The Commonwealth cannot be sure executive branch agencies are taking the measures needed to achieve the intended results of EO 526.
Standard: Executive Order 526 requires state agencies to complete affirmative action and diversity plans at least every two years, and gives ODEO authority to impose remedial actions on noncompliant agencies. ( Section 3 of Executive Order 526; Section 7 of Executive Order 526 )
2 recommendations
- HRD should establish policies and procedures for ODEO to ensure that its staff consistently enforces agency compliance with EO 526.agency: agreed
- HRD should implement monitoring controls to ensure that these policies and procedures are adhered to.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "HRD agrees that Affirmative Action and Diversity plans were not always filed in a timely manner."
Auditor: "However, based on its response, HRD is taking measures to ensure that executive branch agencies file required affirmative action and diversity plans in a timely manner."
Why it matters: Without the progress reports, HRD cannot determine the extent to which executive branch departments are meeting their hiring goals under EO 526.
Standard: Executive Order 526 and HRD’s guidelines require annual progress updates on affirmative action and diversity plans. ( Section 3 of Executive Order 526; Section 3.2 of HRD’s Guidelines for Implementation of Executive Order 526; Section 7 of Executive Order 526 )
1 recommendation
- HRD should develop policies and procedures to monitor the tracking of all affirmative action and diversity plan progress reports to ensure that all agencies are working toward, and reporting on, meeting their goals in the two-year plan cycle.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "HRD/ODEO acknowledges that we can improve the monitoring of the submission of progress reports, as these progress reports provide HRD/ODEO with information as to how agencies are progressing towards achieving their stated Affirmative Action and Diversity goals."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Human Resources Division .
- Audit of the Human Resources Division (July 5, 2024)Other · July 5, 2024