Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority

October 3, 2018 · Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗ · official site ↗

Published October 3, 2018 Audit covers July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2017 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Auditors found GATRA did some things right, including vehicle maintenance tracking, but failed to submit required financial data for public transparency and failed to properly track employee use of agency vehicles.
source
“GATRA did not submit required financial information to the Commonwealth to be made available to the public on a searchable website.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority, covering July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.”
Why was it audited?

The State Auditor reviewed GATRA because Massachusetts law allows the Auditor to examine public agencies and how they manage certain responsibilities.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of certain activities of the Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority (GATRA) for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017.”
Why it matters

Public agencies spend public money, so residents should be able to see required financial information and have confidence that agency vehicles are used properly.

“Therefore, GATRA did not allow the Commonwealth to give the public a sufficient level of transparency regarding GATRA’s operations, including its overall financial health and the nature and extent of its expenses.”
What's in it for me?

If you live in or near GATRA’s service area, this matters because GATRA provides public transportation, including services for seniors and people with disabilities.

“To assist elderly and disabled residents in the community, GATRA provides Dial-a-Ride7 service and arranges transportation with subcontracted transportation providers.”
The bottom line

The audit’s main problems were about transparency and recordkeeping, not a finding that passenger vehicle maintenance was behind schedule.

“Did GATRA maintain a cost maintenance log for each vehicle to ensure that preventive maintenance for vehicles and equipment for transporting passengers with disabilities under the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 was up to date per Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines?”
What happens next

GATRA said it would work on submitting data properly and improve its policies for tracking non-revenue vehicles.

“GATRA will revise its policy and procedures for the oversight and use of its non-revenue vehicles to incorporate best practices from other RTAs and MassDOT.”
Why it's significant

The findings point to weak administrative controls: missing public financial reporting and incomplete tracking of staff vehicle use could reduce accountability.

“As a result of the lack of monitoring of use, there is a higher-than-acceptable risk that these vehicles may be used for non-business purposes without detection.”
Jargon, unpacked

A “non-revenue-producing vehicle” means an agency vehicle used by staff for work, not a bus or van carrying paying riders.

“Non-revenue-producing vehicles are light-duty vehicles for temporary use by GATRA employees for agency-related business.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

GATRA did not submit required financial information to the Commonwealth for public searchable disclosure.
reporting timelinessrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: The public lacked sufficient transparency into GATRA’s operations, financial health, and expenses.

Standard: Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws ( Section 14C of Chapter 7 of the Massachusetts General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • GATRA should develop formal policies and procedures for submitting this required information to EOAF.agency: agreed
  • GATRA should establish monitoring controls to ensure that the staff members assigned to this task adhere to these policies and procedures.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "GATRA will develop its policy and monitoring controls once the timelines and final delivery criteria have been agreed to with the Office of the Comptroller."
Auditor: "Based on its response, GATRA is taking measures to ensure that it reports this required information to EOAF."
GATRA did not properly document employee use of non-revenue-producing vehicles.
asset/inventory controlinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: There is an increased risk that non-revenue-producing vehicles could be used for non-business purposes without detection.

Standard: MassDOT Motor Vehicles Policy, No. P-D0032-01, dated October 5, 2016

2 recommendations
  • GATRA should establish policies and procedures, consistent with those established by MassDOT, for its non-revenue-producing vehicles that require a log documenting vehicle use, operator information, trip purpose, odometer reading, condition, damage, and maintenance issues.agency: agreed
  • GATRA should ensure that these policies and procedures include monitoring controls to ensure that they are adhered to.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "GATRA will revise its policy and procedures for the oversight and use of its non-revenue vehicles to incorporate best practices from other RTAs and MassDOT."
Auditor: "Based on its response, GATRA is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →