Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority (December 24, 2024)

December 24, 2024 · Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗ · official site ↗

Published December 24, 2024 Audit covers July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2023 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found that GATRA bought and reported on its electric buses as required, but it did not make sure maintenance workers had required training, did not properly document required maintenance, and did not ensure farebox cash was reconciled to the fare system.
source
“Below is a summary of our findings, the effects of those findings, and our recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority, covering July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority (GATRA) for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023.”
Why was it audited?

The auditor checked whether GATRA followed requirements for buying electric buses and chargers, maintaining them, managing safety risks, training staff, reporting performance data, and handling farebox revenue data.

“The purpose of our audit was to determine whether GATRA did the following:”
Why it matters

The issues matter because poor training or maintenance can create safety risks for workers and riders, and weak cash reconciliation can create a risk that fare money is underreported or misused.

“If GATRA does not ensure that its contracted transit provider reconciles farebox revenue, then there is a higher-than-acceptable risk that the provider may underreport the farebox revenue and misappropriate the cash revenue that was not captured in the transit fare collection system.”
The bottom line

GATRA met some requirements, including putting the electric buses and chargers into service and submitting required reports, but the auditor found problems with training, maintenance documentation, farebox reconciliation, and electric-bus fire planning.

“Based on the results of our testing, we determined that GATRA’s safety plan was compliant with the Safety Risk Management Requirements outlined in 49 CFR 673.25.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that GATRA get required training in place, document electric-bus maintenance better, monitor its contractor more closely, reconcile farebox cash, and improve electric-bus emergency planning.

“GATRA should develop policies and procedures, including a monitoring component, to verify the accuracy of the total farebox revenue reported by its contracted transit provider.”
Why it's significant

This is significant because GATRA serves many communities, operates a large fleet, and received a major grant to add electric buses and charging stations.

“On November 25, 2020, GATRA was awarded a $5,513,500 grant as part of the Volkswagen Clean Air Act Settlement allocation: $4,973,148 was to purchase six 30-foot-long BEBs, and $540,352 was to purchase and install six charging stations.”
Jargon, unpacked

A BEB is simply a battery electric bus: a bus powered by batteries instead of diesel fuel for driving.

“Since the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law was enacted on November 15, 2021, states and municipalities have invested in projects related to battery electric buses (BEBs), which are buses that use battery power to drive instead of diesel fuel.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

GATRA did not ensure contracted maintenance employees completed required GILLIG training before maintaining battery electric buses.
public safetyvendor oversightinternal controls

Why it matters: Untrained maintenance employees may miss electrical and other hazards, increasing risk of vehicle damage and injury to employees and riders.

Standard: Section 6 of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agreement between Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and Greater Attleboro–Taunton Regional Transit Authority required GATRA personnel to attend manufacturer training on BEB and charging infrastructure operation and maintenance. ( Section 6 of the “Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agreement between Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and Greater Attleboro–Taunton Regional Transit Authority” )

2 recommendations
  • GATRA should contact GILLIG to provide training to maintenance employees.agency: disagreed
  • GATRA should develop policies and procedures to ensure that its contracted transit provider’s employees complete required trainings.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "I respectfully disagree that this should have been a finding."
Auditor: "We reiterate our recommendation that GATRA should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the maintenance employees of its contracted transit provider complete the required training, in accordance with Section 6 of the “Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agreement between Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and Greater Attleboro–Taunton Regional Transit Authority.”"
GATRA did not ensure its contractor performed and documented required preventative maintenance on battery electric bus components.
public safetyrecordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsvendor oversightasset/inventory control

Why it matters: High-voltage BEB components may not receive required maintenance, creating risks of electrical damage, serious injury, death, or vehicle loss.

Standard: Chapter 2 of the GILLIG Service Manual required recurring inspections of high-voltage cables, jump-start connections, high-voltage batteries, battery equalizers, main disconnect switches, and automatic disconnect systems. ( Chapter 2 of the GILLIG Service Manual, dated November 2021 )

2 recommendations
  • GATRA should require its contracted transit provider to document the preventative maintenance performed on its BEBs, including maintenance on high-voltage batteries, high-voltage cables, battery equalizers, and main disconnect switch and automatic disconnect systems.agency: disagreed
  • GATRA should establish monitoring controls (i.e., policies and procedures) that include appropriate management oversight over its preventative maintenance process to ensure that its contracted transit provider performs proper preventative maintenance services on all BEBs.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "This does not change the fact that these buses are, in fact, well-maintained."
Auditor: "The checklist GATRA refers to above was effective after the audit period, and therefore could not be considered in our audit."
GATRA did not ensure its contractor reconciled farebox cash revenue to the transit fare collection system.
cash handlinginternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationvendor oversightfraud/theft

Why it matters: Farebox revenue could be underreported or misappropriated if collected cash is not reconciled to system records.

Standard: The Federal Transit Administration’s Transit Asset Management Systems Handbook recommends data reconciliation with banking and regional fare collection systems. ( Federal Transit Administration’s Transit Asset Management Systems Handbook, dated September 2020 )

2 recommendations
  • GATRA should ensure that its contracted transit provider reconciles the cash payments collected to the cash revenue recorded in the transit fare collection system.agency: already implemented
  • GATRA should develop policies and procedures, including a monitoring component, to verify the accuracy of the total farebox revenue reported by its contracted transit provider.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "GATRA have already addressed the recommendations that were made."
Auditor: "We understand that GATRA took action to address the concern after we notified them; however, this does not erase the finding that occurred during the audit period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →